van den Berg Tom Gerardus Constantijn, Kroesen Maarten, Chorus Caspar Gerard
Department of Engineering Systems and Services, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 30;13:817860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817860. eCollection 2022.
Within moral psychology, theories focusing on the conceptualization and empirical measurement of people's morality in terms of general moral values -such as Moral Foundation Theory- (implicitly) assume general moral values to be relevant concepts for the explanation and prediction of behavior in everyday life. However, a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for this idea remains work in progress. In this study we explore this relationship between general moral values and daily life behavior through a conceptual analysis and an empirical study. Our conceptual analysis of the moral value-moral behavior relationship suggests that the effect of a generally endorsed moral value on moral behavior is highly context dependent. It requires the manifestation of several phases of moral decision-making, each influenced by many contextual factors. We expect that this renders the empirical relationship between generic moral values and people's concrete moral behavior indeterminate. Subsequently, we empirically investigate this relationship in three different studies. We relate two different measures of general moral values -the Moral Foundation Questionnaire and the Morality As Cooperation Questionnaire- to a broad set of self-reported morally relevant daily life behaviors (including adherence to COVID-19 measures and participation in voluntary work). Our empirical results are in line with the expectations derived from our conceptual analysis: the considered general moral values are poor predictors of the selected daily life behaviors. Furthermore, moral values that were tailored to the specific context of the behavior showed to be somewhat stronger predictors. Together with the insights derived from our conceptual analysis, this indicates the relevance of the contextual nature of moral decision-making as a possible explanation for the poor predictive value of general moral values. Our findings suggest that the investigation of morality's influence on behavior by expressing and measuring it in terms of general moral values may need revision.
在道德心理学中,一些理论(如道德基础理论)侧重于从一般道德价值观的角度对人们的道德进行概念化和实证测量,(隐含地)假定一般道德价值观是解释和预测日常生活中行为的相关概念。然而,这一观点的坚实理论和实证基础仍在完善之中。在本研究中,我们通过概念分析和实证研究来探索一般道德价值观与日常生活行为之间的这种关系。我们对道德价值观与道德行为关系的概念分析表明,普遍认可的道德价值观对道德行为的影响高度依赖于情境。它需要道德决策几个阶段的体现,每个阶段都受到许多情境因素的影响。我们预计这会使一般道德价值观与人们具体道德行为之间的实证关系变得不确定。随后,我们在三项不同的研究中对这种关系进行了实证调查。我们将两种不同的一般道德价值观测量方法——道德基础问卷和道德即合作问卷——与一系列广泛的自我报告的与道德相关的日常生活行为(包括遵守新冠疫情防控措施和参与志愿工作)联系起来。我们的实证结果与从概念分析中得出的预期一致:所考虑的一般道德价值观对所选日常生活行为的预测能力较差。此外,针对行为的特定情境量身定制的道德价值观显示出在预测方面略强一些。结合我们从概念分析中获得的见解,这表明道德决策的情境性质对于解释一般道德价值观预测能力较差具有重要意义。我们的研究结果表明,通过一般道德价值观来表达和衡量道德对行为的影响的研究可能需要修正。