Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep/Oct;23(4):332-366. doi: 10.1177/1088868318811759. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
We review empirical research on (social) psychology of morality to identify which issues and relations are well documented by existing data and which areas of inquiry are in need of further empirical evidence. An electronic literature search yielded a total of 1,278 relevant research articles published from 1940 through 2017. These were subjected to expert content analysis and standardized bibliometric analysis to classify research questions and relate these to (trends in) empirical approaches that characterize research on morality. We categorize the research questions addressed in this literature into five different themes and consider how empirical approaches within each of these themes have addressed psychological antecedents and implications of moral behavior. We conclude that some key features of theoretical questions relating to human morality are not systematically captured in empirical research and are in need of further investigation.
我们回顾了(社会)道德心理学的实证研究,以确定哪些问题和关系有现有数据的充分记录,哪些研究领域需要进一步的实证证据。通过电子文献搜索,共检索到 1940 年至 2017 年期间发表的 1278 篇相关研究文章。这些文章经过专家内容分析和标准化文献计量分析,对研究问题进行了分类,并将这些问题与(道德研究中的)描述特征的实证方法联系起来。我们将文献中讨论的研究问题分为五个不同的主题,并考虑了每个主题中的实证方法如何处理道德行为的心理前因和后果。我们的结论是,与人类道德有关的一些理论问题的关键特征在实证研究中没有得到系统的捕捉,需要进一步研究。