• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心 1000 余例完全腹腔镜肝切除术的 4 年经验。

Four-year experience with more than 1000 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection in a single center.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 7;28(25):2968-2980. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2968.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2968
PMID:35978880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9280729/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become a safe surgical procedure that needs additional summarization.

AIM

To review 4 years of total LLR surgeries, exceeding 1000 cases, which were performed at a single center.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LLR at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2015 and December 2018 were identified. Surgical details, including the interventional year, category of liver disease, and malignant liver tumors prognosis, were evaluated. The learning curve for LLR was evaluated using the cumulative sum method. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 1098 patients were identified. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common disease that led to the need for LLR at the center ( = 462, 42.08%). The average operation time was 216.94 ± 98.51 min. The conversion rate was 1.82% (20/1098). The complication rate was 9.20% (from grade II to V). The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates of HCC patients were 89.7% and 81.9%, respectively. The learning curve was grouped into two phases for local resection (cases 1-106 and 107-373), three phases for anatomical segmentectomy (cases 1-44, 45-74 and 75-120), and three phases for hemihepatectomy (cases 1-17, 18-48 and 49-88).

CONCLUSION

LLR may be considered a first-line surgical intervention for liver resection that can be performed safely for a variety of primary, secondary, and recurrent liver tumors and for benign diseases once technical competence is proficiently attained.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)已成为一种安全的手术方法,需要进一步总结。

目的

回顾在四川大学华西医院单中心进行的超过 1000 例 4 年的 LLR 手术。

方法

确定 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在华西医院接受 LLR 的患者。评估手术细节,包括介入年份、肝病类别和恶性肝肿瘤预后。使用累积和方法评估 LLR 的学习曲线。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行生存分析。

结果

最终确定了 1098 例患者。肝癌(HCC)是导致该中心需要进行 LLR 的最常见疾病(=462,42.08%)。平均手术时间为 216.94±98.51 分钟。转化率为 1.82%(20/1098)。并发症发生率为 9.20%(从 II 级到 V 级)。HCC 患者的 1 年和 3 年总生存率分别为 89.7%和 81.9%。学习曲线分为局部切除术(病例 1-106 和 107-373)两个阶段、解剖性肝段切除术(病例 1-44、45-74 和 75-120)三个阶段和半肝切除术(病例 1-17、18-48 和 49-88)三个阶段。

结论

一旦熟练掌握了技术,LLR 可被视为原发性、继发性和复发性肝脏肿瘤以及良性疾病的一线肝切除术干预措施,其安全性较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/128c16c46832/WJG-28-2968-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/7d591a889aa0/WJG-28-2968-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/567f8b017dd4/WJG-28-2968-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/c73c2ad492f1/WJG-28-2968-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/3d3a047339ab/WJG-28-2968-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/128c16c46832/WJG-28-2968-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/7d591a889aa0/WJG-28-2968-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/567f8b017dd4/WJG-28-2968-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/c73c2ad492f1/WJG-28-2968-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/3d3a047339ab/WJG-28-2968-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1403/9280729/128c16c46832/WJG-28-2968-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Four-year experience with more than 1000 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection in a single center.单中心 1000 余例完全腹腔镜肝切除术的 4 年经验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 7;28(25):2968-2980. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2968.
2
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 8: a propensity score-matched two-center study.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝右前叶肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性:一项倾向评分匹配的双中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8438-8446. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10291-8. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: might laparoscopic approach be better in early HCC?腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期和短期手术结果:腹腔镜方法在早期 HCC 中是否更好?
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6372-0. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).腹腔镜与开腹局限性肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:来自广岛临床肿瘤外科学会(HiSCO)的倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5055-5061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatic Resection for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Less Than 5 cm in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化患者直径小于5厘米的孤立性肝细胞癌:一项随机对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):302-310. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0518. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的大型腹腔镜肝切除术的结果
Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;27(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
7
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的多中心倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):658-666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06812-z. Epub 2019 May 15.
8
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma at a North-American Centre: a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis.北美某中心腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的2:1配对分析
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Apr;17(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12342. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
9
Long-Term Implications of Unplanned Conversion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.腹腔镜肝切除术中计划外转为开腹手术对肝细胞癌的长期影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):282-289. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7073-6. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The combination of extra-Glissonian pedicle ligation of the tumor-bearing area and traditional ALPPS: a novel modified ALPPS method.肿瘤区域额外肝蒂结扎与传统ALPPS相结合:一种新型改良ALPPS方法。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Feb 28;16(1):317-326. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-691. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Laparoscopic liver resection utilizing the ventral avascular area of the inferior vena cava: A retrospective cohort study.利用下腔静脉腹侧无血管区的腹腔镜肝切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 7;31(1):100750. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.100750.
3
Towards a Standardization of Learning Curve Assessment in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for liver cancers: A report from a nationwide surgical database in Japan.腹腔镜与开腹再次肝切除术治疗肝癌的手术结果:来自日本全国外科数据库的报告。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):833-842. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1156. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Effect of the learning curve on survival after laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastases.学习曲线对结直肠癌肝转移腹腔镜肝切除术后生存的影响。
BJS Open. 2022 Mar 8;6(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac020.
3
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients: a propensity score matching analysis.
迈向微创肝脏手术学习曲线评估的标准化
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 26;281(2):252-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006417.
4
Surgical Approach to Liver Metastases in GEP-NET in a Tertiary Reference Center.三级转诊中心中GEP-NET肝转移的手术治疗方法
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;15(7):2048. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072048.
腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01518-x.
4
Short-term Outcomes of "Difficult" Laparoscopic Liver Resection at Specialized Centers: Report From INSTALL (International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection)-2 on 4478 Patients."困难"腹腔镜肝切除术在专科中心的短期结果:INSTALL(腹腔镜肝切除术技术方面的国际调查)-2 对 4478 例患者的报告。
Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):940-946. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004434. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects.腹腔镜肝切除术:适应证、局限性和经济方面。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Sep;405(6):725-735. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with a history of abdominal surgeries.有腹部手术史患者行腹腔镜肝切除术的安全性和可行性
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Aug;22(8):1191-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析:比较队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6240-x.
8
Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM.评估腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线:标准和学习曲线累积和(CUSUM)比较研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1505-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.362. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 436 例经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4023-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
Does liver cirrhosis have an impact on the results of different hepatic inflow occlusion methods in laparoscopic liver resection? a propensity score analysis.肝硬化对腹腔镜肝切除中不同入肝血流阻断方法结果的影响:倾向评分分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 May;21(5):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 19.