Cheng Cheng, Xu Banglong, Sheng Jianlong, Huang Zheng, He Fei, Gao Feng, Wang Xiaochen
Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Furong Road 678, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 8;2022:6009275. doi: 10.1155/2022/6009275. eCollection 2022.
To investigate the procedural efficiency, efficacy, and safety of high-power, short-term radiofrequency ablation delivered by the SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
We retrospectively analyzed a total of 72 patients who were admitted with paroxysmal AF, and who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the first time. Of these patients, 36 cases underwent low-power, long-duration (LPLD, (30-35 W/20-40 s) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) delivered by an SmartTouch (ST) catheter (control group), and the other 36 cases underwent high-power, short-duration (HPSD, (45-50 W/10-20 s) PVI delivered by a STSF catheter (study group). The baseline data, duration of PVI, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, the rate of first-pass isolation, irrigation perfusion, eschar and steam pop occurrences, intraoperative complications, and the rate of stable sinus rhythm maintenance following a blanking period of three months were analyzed between the two groups.
The isolation time of bilateral PVI and procedural time in the study group were markedly less than in controls ( < 0.01). The rate of first-pass isolation in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (95.8% vs. 84.7%, = 0.023), while the fluid perfusion in the study group was approximately 20% less than that in the control group (767 ± 171 vs. 966 ± 227 ml, < 0.001). We observed no severe complications in any patients. The rate of freedom from AF recurrences following a blanking period of three months showed a tendency to be higher than in controls (93.9% vs. 87.1%, = 0.348).
The HPSD strategy delivered by the STSF catheter was superior to conventional LPLD ablation through the ST catheter with respect to efficiency, acute procedural effectiveness, short-term safety, and the risk of heart failure in patients with paroxysmal AF.
探讨采用SmartTouch Surround Flow(STSF)导管进行高功率、短期射频消融治疗阵发性心房颤动(AF)的手术效率、疗效及安全性。
我们回顾性分析了72例因阵发性AF入院且首次接受射频导管消融(RFCA)的患者。其中,36例患者采用SmartTouch(ST)导管进行低功率、长时间(LPLD,30 - 35W/20 - 40s)肺静脉隔离(PVI)(对照组),另外36例患者采用STSF导管进行高功率、短时间(HPSD,45 - 50W/10 - 20s)PVI(研究组)。分析两组患者的基线数据、PVI持续时间、手术时间、透视时间、首次通过隔离率、灌注冲洗情况、焦痂和蒸汽泡出现情况、术中并发症以及三个月空白期后窦性心律维持稳定率。
研究组双侧PVI的隔离时间和手术时间明显短于对照组(P < 0.01)。研究组的首次通过隔离率显著高于对照组(95.8%对84.7%,P = 0.023),而研究组的液体灌注量比对照组少约20%(767 ± 171对966 ± 227ml,P < 0.001)。我们在所有患者中均未观察到严重并发症。三个月空白期后AF复发的无事件生存率显示出高于对照组的趋势(93.9%对87.1%,P = 0.348)。
对于阵发性AF患者,STSF导管的HPSD策略在效率、急性手术有效性、短期安全性以及心力衰竭风险方面优于通过ST导管进行的传统LPLD消融。