Jing Yulong, Zhang Shudong, Han Ziyin, Sun Tao
Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai Shandong, 264003, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 15;36(8):946-950. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202203093.
To investigate the short-term effectiveness and advantages of the orthopedic robot-assisted femoral neck system (FNS) fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures compared with the traditional manual operation.
A clinical data of 74 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures, who had undergone internal fixation with FNS between April 2020 and September 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 31 cases of TiRobot-assisted operation (trial group) and 43 cases of traditional manual operation (control group). There was no significant difference between groups ( >0.05) in terms of gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side and type. The fracture fixation time (intraoperative fracture reduction to the end of suture), invasive fixation time (incision of internal fixation to the end of suture), the number of placing key-guide needle, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and Harris score of hip function were recorded and compared.
All operations were performed with no neurovascular injury or incision complications. The invasive fixation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of placing key-guide needle, and the incision length in the trial group were superior to the control group ( <0.05), and there was no significant difference in fracture fixation time between groups ( >0.05). All patients were followed up 4-16 months (mean, 7 months). The fracture did not heal in 1 patient of trial group, and the other fractures healed in 2 groups; the fracture healing time was (17.6±1.9) weeks in trial group and (18.2±1.9) weeks in control group, and there was no significant difference between groups ( =0.957, =0.345). At last follow-up, the Harris score of the trial group was 82.4±5.8, which was higher than that of the control group (79.0±7.7), but the difference was not significant ( =-1.483, =0.147).
Orthopedic robot-assisted FNS fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures has the similar short-term effectiveness as the traditional method, but the former has advantages in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of placing key-guide needle, making the operation more minimally invasive and quicker, and more suitable for older patients.
探讨骨科机器人辅助股骨颈系统(FNS)内固定治疗新鲜股骨颈骨折的短期疗效及优势,并与传统手法手术进行比较。
回顾性分析2020年4月至2021年9月期间74例行FNS内固定治疗的新鲜股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料。其中,31例为钛机器人辅助手术(试验组),43例为传统手法手术(对照组)。两组在性别、年龄、受伤原因、受伤至手术时间、骨折侧别及类型等方面差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录并比较骨折固定时间(术中骨折复位至缝合结束)、侵入性固定时间(内固定切口至缝合结束)、置入关键导针数量、切口长度、术中出血量、骨折愈合情况及髋关节功能Harris评分。
所有手术均未发生神经血管损伤或切口并发症。试验组的侵入性固定时间、术中出血量、置入关键导针数量及切口长度均优于对照组(<0.05),两组骨折固定时间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。所有患者均获随访4~16个月(平均7个月)。试验组1例患者骨折未愈合,两组其余骨折均愈合;试验组骨折愈合时间为(17.6±1.9)周,对照组为(18.2±1.9)周,两组差异无统计学意义(=0.957,=0.345)。末次随访时,试验组Harris评分为82.4±5.8,高于对照组(79.0±7.7),但差异无统计学意义(=-1.483,=0.147)。
骨科机器人辅助FNS内固定治疗新鲜股骨颈骨折的短期疗效与传统方法相似,但在手术时间、术中出血量及置入关键导针数量方面具有优势,使手术更微创、更快捷,更适合老年患者。