Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Nov 2;104(21):1877-1885. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00016. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
While surgeons in low and middle-income countries have increasing experience with intramedullary nailing (IMN), external fixation (EF) continues to be commonly used for the management of open tibial fractures. We examined outcomes with extended follow-up of the participants enrolled in a clinical trial comparing these treatments.
Adults who were ≥18 years old with acute AO/OTA type-42 open tibial shaft fractures were randomly assigned to statically locked, hand-reamed IMN or uniplanar EF. These participants were reevaluated 3 to 5 years after treatment. The primary outcome was death or reoperation for the treatment of deep infection, nonunion, or malalignment. Unresolved complications such as persistent fracture-related infection, nonunion, or malalignment were collected and analyzed. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score, radiographic alignment, and the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (mRUST).
Of the originally enrolled 240 participants,126 (67 managed with IMN and 59 managed with EF) died or returned for follow-up at a mean of 4.0 years (range, 2.9 to 5.2 years). Thirty-two composite primary events occurred, with rates of 23.9% and 27.1% in the IMN and EF groups, respectively. Six of these events (3 in the IMN group and 3 in the EF group) were newly detected after the original 1-year follow-up. Unresolved complications in the form of chronic fracture-related infection or nonunion were present at long-term follow-up in 25% of the participants who sustained a primary event. The EQ-5D-3L index scores were similar between the 2 groups and only returned to preinjury levels after 1 year among patients without complications or those whose complications resolved.
This observational study extended follow-up for a clinical trial assessing IMN versus EF for the treatment of open tibial fractures in sub-Saharan Africa. At a mean of 4 years after injury, fracture-related infection and nonunion became chronic conditions in nearly a quarter of the participants who experienced these complications, regardless of reintervention.
Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
在中低收入国家,外科医生使用髓内钉(IMN)的经验越来越多,但对于开放性胫骨骨折的治疗,外固定架(EF)仍被广泛应用。我们对参加比较这两种治疗方法的临床试验的参与者进行了延长随访,以检查其结果。
年龄在 18 岁及以上、患有急性 AO/OTA 42 型开放性胫骨骨干骨折的成年人被随机分配接受静态锁定、手动扩髓 IMN 或单平面 EF 治疗。这些参与者在治疗后 3 至 5 年进行了重新评估。主要结局是因深部感染、骨不连或对线不良而死亡或再次手术。收集并分析未解决的并发症,如持续性骨折相关感染、骨不连或对线不良。次要结局包括 EuroQol-5 维度-3 级(EQ-5D-3L)问卷、创伤功能指数(FIX-IT)评分、影像学对线和改良胫骨骨折放射学愈合评分(mRUST)。
在最初纳入的 240 名参与者中,126 名(67 名接受 IMN 治疗,59 名接受 EF 治疗)死亡或在平均 4.0 年(范围 2.9 至 5.2 年)时返回进行随访。发生了 32 例复合主要事件,IMN 组和 EF 组的发生率分别为 23.9%和 27.1%。其中 6 例(IMN 组 3 例,EF 组 3 例)在最初的 1 年随访后新出现。在发生主要事件的参与者中,25%的人在长期随访中出现慢性骨折相关感染或骨不连的未解决并发症。2 组的 EQ-5D-3L 指数评分相似,只有在无并发症或并发症解决的患者中,在 1 年后才恢复到受伤前的水平。
本观察性研究对评估在撒哈拉以南非洲地区髓内钉与外固定架治疗开放性胫骨骨折的临床试验进行了延长随访。在受伤后平均 4 年时,近四分之一经历这些并发症的参与者的骨折相关感染和骨不连成为慢性疾病,无论是否再次干预。
治疗学四级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。