Yıldırım Jülide Ceren, Bahtiyar Başak
Istanbul University.
Maltepe University.
J Psychol. 2022;156(8):552-567. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2022.2107977. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
Although experiential avoidance is emphasized as an underlying factor for persevering worry, limited empirical attempt exists to integrate this concept with cognitive models explaining pathological worry. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate the mediator role of different experiential avoidance strategies in the relationship between metacognitions and worry-related symptoms. The study was conducted with a community sample consisting of 563 volunteer participants (405 females, 158 males) whose ages ranged between 18 and 40 ( = 25.56, = 4.72). Online data collection of self-report measures including demographic information form, Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire, and Penn State Worry Questionnaire was applied. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis revealed that experiential avoidance predicted worry beyond metacognition. In addition, particular avoidant strategies, aversion/avoidance, procrastination, distraction, and distress endurance explained the associations between positive and negative metacognitive beliefs and worry. Current findings point to different avoidant strategies that might play a role in the intensification and maintenance of worry and suggest the benefits of incorporating acceptance and commitment-based interventions with metacognitive therapy for better therapeutic outcomes.
尽管经验性回避被强调为持续性担忧的一个潜在因素,但将这一概念与解释病理性担忧的认知模型相结合的实证尝试有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同经验性回避策略在元认知与担忧相关症状之间关系中的中介作用。该研究以一个社区样本进行,样本由563名志愿者参与者(405名女性,158名男性)组成,年龄在18至40岁之间(平均年龄=25.56,标准差=4.72)。采用在线数据收集自我报告测量方法,包括人口统计学信息表、元认知问卷-30、多维经验性回避问卷和宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷。层次回归分析结果显示,经验性回避在元认知之外还能预测担忧。此外,特定的回避策略,即厌恶/回避、拖延、分心和痛苦耐受,解释了积极和消极元认知信念与担忧之间的关联。当前研究结果指出了不同的回避策略可能在担忧的加剧和维持中发挥作用,并表明将基于接纳与承诺的干预措施与元认知疗法相结合以获得更好治疗效果的益处。