• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估初级保健环境中药师驱动的干预措施以提高覆盖率和药物依从性。

Evaluating Pharmacist-Driven Interventions in a Primary Care Setting to Improve Proportion of Days Covered and Medication Adherence.

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Davie, FL, USA.

Pharmacy Practice, Nova Southeastern University West Palm Beach Student Educational Center, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2024 Feb;37(1):27-34. doi: 10.1177/08971900221111144. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1177/08971900221111144
PMID:35981874
Abstract

Medication nonadherence is the leading cause of poor health outcomes and increased risk of hospitalizations. Previous studies have shown that pharmacist interventions can help improve medication adherence and CMS quality measures. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions on medication adherence and PDC scores for ACEi/ARBs, statins, and noninsulin antidiabetic medications in the primary care setting. This observational study was conducted at four primary care clinics to evaluate PDC scores pre- and post-pharmacist interventions from April 2020 to December 2020. Eligible patients were Humana Part D beneficiaries with a baseline PDC score <85%. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the average change in final PDC scores, and 1-month change in PDC scores following a pharmacist intervention. Secondary outcomes were number and types of adherence barriers identified, interventions provided by the pharmacist, and barriers and interventions category (pharmacy, patient or physician-related). A total of 89 barriers were identified and 208 interventions were completed. A statistically significant difference in the average change of final PDC score from baseline was seen among those on ACEi/ARBs (72.5 to 78.0, = 0.004) and statins (73.3 to 76.6, < 0.001). Similarly, a statistically significant change was observed from baseline to 1-month PDC among those on ACEi/ARBS (72.5 to 75.4, = 0.001) and statins (73.3 to 74.9, < 0.001). Conclusion: Pharmacists located in a primary care setting improved medication adherence and PDC score for patients on ACEIs/ARBs and statins.

摘要

药物依从性差是导致健康状况不佳和住院风险增加的主要原因。先前的研究表明,药剂师的干预可以帮助提高药物依从性和 CMS 质量指标。本研究的目的是探讨临床药师干预对初级保健环境中 ACEi/ARB、他汀类药物和非胰岛素类抗糖尿病药物的药物依从性和 PDC 评分的影响。这项观察性研究在四家初级保健诊所进行,以评估 2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月期间药剂师干预前后的 PDC 评分。合格患者为基线 PDC 评分<85%的 Humana Part D 受益人的患者。本研究的主要结果是评估最终 PDC 评分的平均变化,以及药剂师干预后 1 个月 PDC 评分的变化。次要结果是确定的药物依从性障碍的数量和类型、药剂师提供的干预措施以及障碍和干预措施类别(药房、患者或医生相关)。共确定了 89 个障碍,并完成了 208 次干预。在 ACEi/ARB(从 72.5 到 78.0, = 0.004)和他汀类药物(从 73.3 到 76.6, < 0.001)中,最终 PDC 评分的平均变化从基线开始有统计学意义的差异。同样,在 ACEi/ARB(从 72.5 到 75.4, = 0.001)和他汀类药物(从 73.3 到 74.9, < 0.001)中,从基线到 1 个月 PDC 的变化也有统计学意义。结论:在初级保健环境中,药剂师提高了 ACEIs/ARBs 和他汀类药物患者的药物依从性和 PDC 评分。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Pharmacist-Driven Interventions in a Primary Care Setting to Improve Proportion of Days Covered and Medication Adherence.评估初级保健环境中药师驱动的干预措施以提高覆盖率和药物依从性。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Feb;37(1):27-34. doi: 10.1177/08971900221111144. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
A Pharmacist Telephone Intervention to Identify Adherence Barriers and Improve Adherence Among Nonadherent Patients with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes in a Medicare Advantage Plan.一项药师电话干预措施,旨在识别依从性障碍并提高医疗保险优势计划中患有高血压和糖尿病合并症的非依从患者的依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):63-73. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.63.
3
Identifying adherent patients to newly initiated statins using previous adherence to chronic medications.利用患者对慢性药物的既往依从性来识别新起始他汀类药物的依从性患者。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Feb;27(2):186-197. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.2.186.
4
Impact of Community Pharmacist Interventions With Managed Care to Improve Medication Adherence.社区药剂师干预管理式医疗对提高药物依从性的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):694-702. doi: 10.1177/0897190019896505. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
5
Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven medication adherence enhancement service.评估药师主导的药物依从性增强服务。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Apr;27(4):507-515. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.507.
6
Comprehensive Medication Management and Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions.慢性病的综合药物管理与药物依从性
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):56-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.56.
7
Impact of Adherence Education and Monitoring on Community Pharmacy Performance Scores and Patient Satisfaction.依从性教育与监测对社区药房绩效评分及患者满意度的影响。
Innov Pharm. 2020 Jul 31;11(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i3.3369. eCollection 2020.
8
Change in Proportion of Days Covered for Statins Following Implementation of a Pharmacy Student Adherence Outreach Program.实施药学学生依从性外展计划后他汀类药物覆盖天数比例的变化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 May;25(5):588-592. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.5.588.
9
Evaluation of community pharmacist-provided telephone interventions to improve adherence to hypertension and diabetes medications.评估社区药剂师提供的电话干预措施对提高高血压和糖尿病药物依从性的效果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4S):S120-S124. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Impact of medication synchronization programs on proportion of days covered (PDC) scores and Medicare Part D medication-related adherence metrics.药物同步化计划对覆盖天数(PDC)评分和医疗保险部分 D 药物相关遵医嘱指标的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 30.