Chirinos Julio, Lopez-Jaramillo Patricio, Giamarellos-Bourboulis Evangelos, Dávila-Del-Carpio Gonzalo, Bizri Abdul, Andrade-Villanueva Jaime, Salman Oday, Cure-Cure Carlos, Rosado-Santander Nelson, Giraldo Mario Cornejo, González-Hernández Luz, Moghnieh Rima, Angeliki Rapti, Saldarriaga María Cruz, Pariona Marcos, Medina Carola, Dimitroulis Ioannis, Vlachopoulos Charalambos, Gutierrez Corina, Rodriguez-Mori Juan, Gomez-Laiton Edgar, Pereyra Rosa, Hernández Jorge Ravelo, Arbañil Hugo, Accini-Mendoza José, Pérez-Mayorga Maritza, Milionis Haralampos, Poulakou Garyfallia, Sánchez Gregorio, Valdivia-Vega Renzo, Villavicencio-Carranza Mirko, Ayala-Garcia Ricardo, Castro-Callirgos Carlos, Carrasco Rosa Alfaro, Danos Willy Lecca, Sharkoski Tiffany, Greene Katherine, Pourmussa Bianca, Greczylo Candy, Chittams Jesse, Katsaounou Paraskevi, Alexiou Zoi, Sympardi Styliani, Sweitzer Nancy, Putt Mary, Cohen Jordana
University of Pennsylvania.
Universidad de Santander.
Res Sq. 2022 Aug 10:rs.3.rs-1933913. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1933913/v1.
Background Abnormal cellular lipid metabolism appears to underlie SARS-CoV-2 cytotoxicity and may involve inhibition of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα). Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α activator, modulates cellular lipid metabolism. Fenofibric acid has also been shown to affect the dimerization of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Fenofibrate and fenofibric acid have been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in cell culture systems . Methods We randomly assigned 701 participants with COVID-19 within 14 days of symptom onset to 145 mg of fenofibrate (nanocrystal formulation with dose adjustment for renal function or dose-equivalent preparations of micronized fenofibrate or fenofibric acid) vs. placebo for 10 days, in a double-blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was a ranked severity score in which participants were ranked across hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygenation parameters, subsequent hospitalizations and symptom severity and duration. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04517396. Findings: Mean age of participants was 49 ± 16 years, 330 (47%) were female, mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m , and 102 (15%) had diabetes mellitus. A total of 41 deaths occurred. Compared with placebo, fenofibrate administration had no effect on the primary endpoint. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) rank in the placebo arm was 347 (172, 453) vs. 345 (175, 453) in the fenofibrate arm (P = 0.819). There was no difference in various secondary and exploratory endpoints, including all-cause death, across randomization arms. These results were highly consistent across pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusion Among patients with COVID-19, fenofibrate has no significant effect on various clinically relevant outcomes.
异常的细胞脂质代谢似乎是新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)细胞毒性的基础,可能涉及过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α(PPARα)的抑制。非诺贝特是一种PPAR-α激活剂,可调节细胞脂质代谢。非诺贝酸也已被证明会影响血管紧张素转换酶2(SARS-CoV-2的细胞受体)的二聚化。非诺贝特和非诺贝酸已被证明在细胞培养系统中可抑制SARS-CoV-2复制。方法:我们将701名在症状出现14天内的新冠肺炎患者以双盲方式随机分配,分别给予145毫克非诺贝特(根据肾功能调整剂量的纳米晶制剂或微粉化非诺贝特或非诺贝酸的等效剂量制剂)或安慰剂,为期10天。主要终点是一个分级严重程度评分,其中参与者根据包括死亡时间、机械通气持续时间、氧合参数、随后的住院情况以及症状严重程度和持续时间等分层等级进行排名。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT04517396。结果:参与者的平均年龄为49±16岁,330名(47%)为女性,平均体重指数为28±6kg/m²,102名(15%)患有糖尿病。共有41人死亡。与安慰剂相比,给予非诺贝特对主要终点没有影响。安慰剂组的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])排名为347(172,453),非诺贝特组为345(175,453)(P = 0.819)。在各个次要和探索性终点,包括全因死亡方面,随机分组之间没有差异。这些结果在预先指定的敏感性和亚组分析中高度一致。结论:在新冠肺炎患者中,非诺贝特对各种临床相关结局没有显著影响。