• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国癌症患者医疗利用的社会经济不平等:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据。

Socioeconomic inequality in health care use among cancer patients in China: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Center for Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;10:942911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942911. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.942911
PMID:35983352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide and the leading cause of death in China, with increasing incidence and mortality rates. This study sought to assess socioeconomic-related inequalities in health care use among cancer patients in China and to analyze factors associated with this disparity.

METHODS

This study used data collected for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2018. Patients who reported having cancer were included. The annual per capita household expenditure was classified into five groups by the quintile method. We calculated the distribution of actual, need-predicted, and need-standardized health care use across different socioeconomic groups among patients with cancer. The concentration index (CI) was used to evaluate inequalities in health care use. Influencing factors of inequalities were measured with the decomposition method.

RESULTS

A total of 392 people diagnosed with cancer were included in this study. The proportion of cancer patients who utilized outpatient and inpatient services was 23.47% and 40.82%, respectively, and the CIs for actual outpatient and inpatient service use were 0.1419 and 0.1960. The standardized CIs (CI for outpatient visits = 0.1549; CI for inpatient services = 0.1802) were also both positive, indicating that affluent cancer patients used more health services. The annual per capita household expenditure was the greatest factor favoring the better-off, which contributed as much as 78.99% and 83.92% to the inequality in outpatient and inpatient services use, followed by high school education (26.49% for outpatient services) and living in a rural village (34.53% for inpatient services). Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance exacerbated the inequality in inpatient services (21.97%) while having a negative impact on outpatient visits (-22.19%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a pro-rich inequality in outpatient and inpatient services use among cancer patients in China. A lower socioeconomic status is negatively associated with cancer care use. Hence, more targeted financial protection for poor people would relieve cancer patients of the burden caused by the high cost of cancer care.

摘要

背景

癌症是全球重大公共卫生问题,也是中国的主要死亡原因,其发病率和死亡率呈上升趋势。本研究旨在评估中国癌症患者卫生保健利用的社会经济相关不平等,并分析导致这种差异的因素。

方法

本研究使用了 2018 年中国健康与养老追踪调查的数据。纳入报告患有癌症的患者。采用五分位法将患者的家庭人均年支出分为五组。我们计算了不同社会经济群体中癌症患者实际、需求预测和需求标准化卫生保健利用的分布。使用集中指数(CI)评估卫生保健利用的不平等程度。使用分解法衡量不平等的影响因素。

结果

本研究共纳入 392 名确诊癌症患者。癌症患者门诊和住院服务利用率分别为 23.47%和 40.82%,实际门诊和住院服务利用的 CI 分别为 0.1419 和 0.1960。标准化 CI(门诊就诊 CI = 0.1549;住院服务 CI = 0.1802)也均为正值,表明富裕的癌症患者使用了更多的卫生服务。家庭人均年支出是有利于富人的最大因素,对门诊和住院服务利用不平等的贡献分别高达 78.99%和 83.92%,其次是高中教育(门诊服务 26.49%)和居住在农村地区(住院服务 34.53%)。城镇职工基本医疗保险加剧了住院服务的不平等(21.97%),同时对门诊就诊产生负面影响(-22.19%)。

结论

中国癌症患者门诊和住院服务利用存在贫富不均。较低的社会经济地位与癌症护理利用呈负相关。因此,对贫困人口进行更有针对性的经济保护,可以减轻癌症患者因癌症护理费用高而带来的负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/9379281/4c1921bedca2/fpubh-10-942911-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/9379281/42a448d55028/fpubh-10-942911-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/9379281/4c1921bedca2/fpubh-10-942911-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/9379281/42a448d55028/fpubh-10-942911-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e9/9379281/4c1921bedca2/fpubh-10-942911-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic inequality in health care use among cancer patients in China: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.中国癌症患者医疗利用的社会经济不平等:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;10:942911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942911. eCollection 2022.
2
Inequalities in health care use among patients with arthritis in China: using Andersen's Behavioral Model.中国关节炎患者医疗服务利用的不平等性:基于安德森行为模型的研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Aug 31;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00572-x.
3
Influencing factors of inequity in health services utilization among the elderly in China.中国老年人健康服务利用不平等的影响因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 15;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0861-6.
4
Identifying determinants of socioeconomic inequality in health service utilization among patients with chronic non-communicable diseases in China.识别中国慢性非传染性疾病患者卫生服务利用中社会经济不平等的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 24;9(6):e100231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100231. eCollection 2014.
5
Growing old before growing rich: inequality in health service utilization among the mid-aged and elderly in Gansu and Zhejiang Provinces, China.未富先老:中国甘肃和浙江两省中老年人健康服务利用不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 4;12:302. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-302.
6
Healthcare utilization and its association with socioeconomic status in China: Evidence from the 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.中国的医疗保健利用及其与社会经济地位的关系:来自 2011-2018 年中国健康与退休纵向研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0297025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297025. eCollection 2024.
7
Factors associated with health care utilization and catastrophic health expenditure among cancer patients in China: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.中国癌症患者的医疗保健利用和灾难性卫生支出相关因素:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:943271. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.943271. eCollection 2022.
8
Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China.中国莒南县新农合的收入相关不平等:一项为期五年的实证研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 May 16;13:38. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-38.
9
Inequity in inpatient services utilization: a longitudinal comparative analysis of middle-aged and elderly patients with the chronic non-communicable diseases in China.不平等的住院服务利用:中国中老年慢性病患者的纵向对比分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jan 6;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1117-9.
10
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.中国城乡医保整合下住院医疗净效益的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 22;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing Online Search Trends for Kidney, Prostate, and Bladder Cancers in China: Infodemiology Study Using Baidu Search Data (2011-2023).分析中国肾癌、前列腺癌和膀胱癌的在线搜索趋势:利用百度搜索数据进行的信息流行病学研究(2011 - 2023年)
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 14;11:e57414. doi: 10.2196/57414.
2
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared sorafenib as first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在中国,卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼与索拉非尼作为晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 11;14(12):e079603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079603.
3
Inequalities changes in health services utilization among middle-aged and older adult disabled people in China: based on CHARLS 2011-2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in medical costs among urban lung cancer patients with different health insurance schemes: a retrospective study.不同医疗保险方案的城市肺癌患者医疗费用差异:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 7;22(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07957-9.
2
Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, income inequality, and colorectal cancer outcomes: evidence from the 4C2 collaboration.种族、社会经济地位、收入不平等与结直肠癌结局:来自 4C2 协作组的证据。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Apr;33(4):533-546. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01547-6. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
The Disease and Economic Burdens of Esophageal Cancer in China from 2013 to 2030: Dynamic Cohort Modeling Study.
中国中老年残疾人群健康服务利用不平等变化:基于 CHARLS2011-2018。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 1;12:1434106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434106. eCollection 2024.
4
Access to advanced healthcare services and its associated factors among patients with cervical cancer in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴宫颈癌患者获得先进医疗服务及其相关因素
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 23;14:1342236. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342236. eCollection 2024.
5
Reliability and validity of the cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep scale in cancer patients.癌症患者睡眠相关功能失调信念和态度量表的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05580-y.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.斯鲁利单抗联合疗法与单纯化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 11;13:1259574. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259574. eCollection 2023.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗作为中国晚期胆道癌患者一线治疗的成本效果分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11255-w.
8
Unmet supportive care needs and associated factors: Evidence from 4195 cancer survivors in Shanghai, China.未满足的支持性护理需求及相关因素:来自中国上海4195名癌症幸存者的证据。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 30;12:1054885. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054885. eCollection 2022.
2013 年至 2030 年中国食管癌的疾病负担和经济负担:动态队列模型研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Mar 2;8(3):e33191. doi: 10.2196/33191.
4
Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020.中国癌症发病率、死亡率和疾病负担的变化趋势分析:基于 2020 年全球公布的流行病学数据与美国和英国的比较
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Oct;41(10):1037-1048. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12197. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
The changes in socioeconomic inequalities and inequities in health services utilization among patients with hypertension in Pearl River Delta of China, 2015 and 2019.2015年和2019年中国珠江三角洲高血压患者健康服务利用方面社会经济不平等和不公平现象的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10879-6.
6
Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020.全球及中国癌症负担的变化趋势:对《2020年全球癌症统计数据》的二次分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Mar 17;134(7):783-791. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Inequality in healthcare use among older people in Colombia.哥伦比亚老年人医疗保健使用的不平等现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 26;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01241-0.
9
Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症预测生物标志物检测和生物及精准治疗的利用是否存在社会经济不平等?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 23;18(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01753-0.
10
Disparities in end-of-life care, expenditures, and place of death by health insurance among cancer patients in China: a population-based, retrospective study.中国癌症患者的医疗保险在临终关怀、支出和死亡地点方面的差异:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):1354. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09463-1.