• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国,卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼与索拉非尼作为晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析。

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared sorafenib as first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Cai Hongfu, Lin Jingwen, Zhu Huide, Zheng Zhiwei

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 11;14(12):e079603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079603.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079603
PMID:39663164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11647293/
Abstract

AIM

The objective of this research is to assess the cost-effectiveness of combining camrelizumab with rivoceranib in comparison to sorafenib as first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from the Chinese medical system perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was employed to perform a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis. This analysis incorporated multiple factors, such as treatment effectiveness, adverse events and costs, all of which were derived from data obtained from the CARES-310 trial. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness and reliability of the model.

RESULTS

The comparison between the two groups demonstrated that the cohort receiving camrelizumab combined with rivoceranib exhibited a significant increase of 0.803 quality-adjusted life year (QALY), alongside an additional expenditure of US$7345.051. This computation resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$9147.012 per QALY, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$39 855.785 per QALY in China. Sensitivity analyses conducted in this study further demonstrated the robustness of the results across various assumptions.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib as a treatment option is not only associated with improved health outcomes but also represents a cost-effective choice in China.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从中国医疗体系角度评估卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞沃替尼与索拉非尼作为晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

采用分区生存模型进行全面的成本效益分析。该分析纳入了多个因素,如治疗效果、不良事件和成本,所有这些均来自CARES - 310试验获得的数据。此外,还进行了敏感性分析以评估模型的稳健性和可靠性。

结果

两组之间的比较表明,接受卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞沃替尼的队列的质量调整生命年(QALY)显著增加了0.803,同时额外支出7345.051美元。由此计算得出的每QALY增量成本效益比为9147.012美元,低于中国每QALY 39855.785美元的支付意愿阈值。本研究进行的敏感性分析进一步证明了结果在各种假设下的稳健性。

结论

在中国,采用卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞沃替尼作为治疗方案不仅与改善健康结果相关,而且是一种具有成本效益的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/3029e65489e5/bmjopen-14-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/f2e568c51b3d/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/e5c17d5bda2e/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/3029e65489e5/bmjopen-14-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/f2e568c51b3d/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/e5c17d5bda2e/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a0/11647293/3029e65489e5/bmjopen-14-12-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared sorafenib as first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在中国,卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼与索拉非尼作为晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 11;14(12):e079603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079603.
2
Economic evaluation of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States and China.卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼对比索拉非尼用于不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的经济学评价:美国与中国视角
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1189-1199. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01752-8. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System.卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼对比索拉非尼作为中国卫生体系下不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Mar;44(3):149-162. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01343-5. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the US and Chinese setting: a modelling comparison study.在美国和中国背景下,阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗与索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益:一项建模比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e094804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094804.
5
First-Line Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A China-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.一线卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿伐替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌:基于中国的成本效益分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024 Nov 23;18:11795549241299393. doi: 10.1177/11795549241299393. eCollection 2024.
6
Tremelimumab plus durvalumab versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the US payer perspective.从美国医保支付方角度进行的度伐利尤单抗联合曲美木单抗与索拉非尼用于不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 29;15(4):e090992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090992.
7
Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿伐替尼与索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 2;18:17562848241310314. doi: 10.1177/17562848241310314. eCollection 2025.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗与索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0037.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: A Comparative Analysis of HAIC-FO and Sorafenib.中国晚期肝细胞癌肝动脉化疗栓塞的成本效果分析:HAIC-FO 与索拉非尼的比较分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jul 21;30:e944526. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944526.
10
Promising first-line immuno-combination therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.不可切除肝细胞癌的一线免疫联合治疗:成本效益分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70094. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70094.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling T cell exhaustion through co-inhibitory receptors and its transformative role in cancer immunotherapy.通过共抑制受体解析T细胞耗竭及其在癌症免疫治疗中的变革性作用。
Clin Transl Med. 2025 May;15(5):e70345. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70345.

本文引用的文献

1
Tislelizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.替雷利珠单抗对比索拉非尼用于不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的随机对照 3 期临床研究。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Dec 1;9(12):1651-1659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4003.
2
The impact of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medicines use and cost in China: A cohort study based on national health insurance data.政府报销谈判对中国靶向抗癌药物使用和成本的影响:基于国家医疗保险数据的队列研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Aug 11;13:04083. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04083.
3
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CARES-310): a randomised, open-label, international phase 3 study.
卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼对比索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗(CARES-310):一项随机、开放标签、国际多中心 3 期研究。
Lancet. 2023 Sep 30;402(10408):1133-1146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00961-3. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Research on equity of medical resource allocation in Yangtze River Economic Belt under healthy China strategy.健康中国战略下长江经济带医疗资源配置公平性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;11:1175276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175276. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus IBI305 versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatic cell carcinoma in China.信迪利单抗联合 IBI305 对比索拉非尼用于中国不可切除肝细胞癌的成本效果分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):14871-14880. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5724. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Access to innovative drugs and the National Reimbursement Drug List in China: Changing dynamics and future trends in pricing and reimbursement.中国创新药物准入与国家医保药品目录:定价与报销的动态变化及未来趋势
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jun 13;11(1):2218633. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2218633. eCollection 2023.
7
Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress and new strategy.肝细胞癌的免疫治疗:最新进展与新策略。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 10;14:1192506. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1192506. eCollection 2023.
8
First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.不可切除肝细胞癌的一线系统治疗策略:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0279786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279786. eCollection 2023.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.在中国,索拉非尼、仑伐替尼、阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗以及信迪利单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期肝细胞癌的成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Mar 31;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00435-x.
10
Systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.不可切除肝细胞癌的系统治疗。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 14;29(10):1551-1568. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i10.1551.