• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持性住房对精神障碍患者的影响。

The effects of supported housing for individuals with mental disorders.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2022 Oct;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):115-133. doi: 10.1002/hec.4579. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4579
PMID:35983703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9805038/
Abstract

Societies face the challenge of providing appropriate arrangements for individuals who need living support due to their mental disorders. We estimate the effects of eligibility to the Dutch supported housing program (Beschermd Wonen), which offers a structured living environment in the community as an intermediate alternative to independent housing and inpatient care. For this, we use exogenous variation in eligibility based on conditionally random assignment of applications to assessors, and the universe of applications to supported housing in the Netherlands, linked to rich administrative data. Supported housing eligibility increases the probability of moving into supported housing and decreases the use of home care, resulting in higher total care expenditures. This increase is primarily due to the costs of supported housing, but potentially also higher consumption of curative mental health care. Supported housing eligibility reduces the total personal income and income from work. Findings do also suggest lower participation in the labor market by the individuals granted eligibility, but the labor participation of their parents increases in the long-run. Our study highlights the trade-offs of access to supported housing for those at the margin of eligibility, informing the design of long-term mental health care systems around the world.

摘要

社会面临着为那些因精神障碍而需要生活支持的人提供适当安排的挑战。我们评估了荷兰支持性住房计划(Beschermd Wonen)的资格的效果,该计划在社区中提供结构化的生活环境,作为独立住房和住院护理的中间选择。为此,我们根据对评估员的申请条件性随机分配利用资格的外生性变化,并利用荷兰支持性住房的申请总体情况,与丰富的行政数据相关联。支持性住房资格增加了入住支持性住房的可能性,并减少了家庭护理的使用,从而导致更高的总护理支出。这种增加主要是由于支持性住房的成本,但也可能是精神保健治疗的消费增加。支持性住房资格降低了总收入和工作收入。研究结果还表明,获得资格的个人参与劳动力市场的比例降低,但他们父母的劳动力参与率在长期内会增加。我们的研究强调了边缘资格人群获得支持性住房的权衡,为世界各地的长期精神卫生保健系统设计提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/9805038/e2be3324f543/HEC-31-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/9805038/38a4ca158bb1/HEC-31-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/9805038/e2be3324f543/HEC-31-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/9805038/38a4ca158bb1/HEC-31-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/9805038/e2be3324f543/HEC-31-115-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of supported housing for individuals with mental disorders.支持性住房对精神障碍患者的影响。
Health Econ. 2022 Oct;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):115-133. doi: 10.1002/hec.4579. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Cost Analysis of a High Support Housing Initiative for Persons with Severe Mental Illness and Long-Term Psychiatric Hospitalization.高支持性住房计划对严重精神疾病和长期住院患者的成本分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;63(7):492-500. doi: 10.1177/0706743717752881. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
3
Evaluation of a modernized supported housing intervention for individuals who experience severe and persistent mental illness in Ontario, Canada.对加拿大安大略省针对患有严重和持续性精神疾病的个人的现代化支持性住房干预措施的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):963-973. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12915. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Better off at home? Effects of nursing home eligibility on costs, hospitalizations and survival.居家是否更好?养老院资格对成本、住院和生存的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;73:102354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102354. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
[Residents in supported housing and factors related to moving towards independent living].[支持性住房中的居民以及与迈向独立生活相关的因素]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60(12):817-826.
6
Effect of full-service partnerships on homelessness, use and costs of mental health services, and quality of life among adults with serious mental illness.全方位服务伙伴关系对严重精神疾病成年患者的无家可归状况、心理健康服务的使用与成本以及生活质量的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;67(6):645-52. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.56.
7
8
A home but how to connect with others? A qualitative meta-synthesis of experiences of people with mental illness living in supported housing.精神疾病患者居住在支持性住房中的体验:定性元分析
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):546-564. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12615. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Factors associated with departure from supported independent living programs for persons with serious mental illness.与严重精神疾病患者脱离支持性独立生活项目相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Mar;60(3):367-73. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.367.
10
Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study.英格兰从心理健康支持性住宿过渡的预测因素:全国队列研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):331-337. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.101.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the economic effects of housing support expenditures under the perspective of consumption heterogeneity: Evidence from China.从消费异质性角度研究住房支持支出的经济效应:来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0306138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306138. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of childhood health shocks on parental labor supply.儿童期健康冲击对父母劳动力供给的影响。
J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;78:102486. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102486. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
IPS in Supported Housing: Fidelity and Employment Outcomes Over a 4 Year Period.支持性住房中的个体安置计划服务:四年期间的保真度与就业成果
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 14;11:622061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.622061. eCollection 2020.
3
Better off at home? Effects of nursing home eligibility on costs, hospitalizations and survival.居家是否更好?养老院资格对成本、住院和生存的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;73:102354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102354. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Mental health supported accommodation services: a systematic review of mental health and psychosocial outcomes.心理健康支持性住宿服务:心理健康和心理社会结局的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 15;18(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1725-8.
5
What Works? Toward a New Classification System for Mental Health Supported Accommodation Services: The Simple Taxonomy for Supported Accommodation (STAX-SA).有效的方法:为心理健康支持性住宿服务建立新的分类系统:支持性住宿的简易分类法(STAX-SA)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 24;15(2):190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020190.
6
Identifying profiles of service users in housing services and exploring their quality of life and care needs.识别住房服务中服务使用者的概况,并探索他们的生活质量和护理需求。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 23;16(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1122-0.
7
Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments.全球社区精神卫生保健:现状与未来发展
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):276-286. doi: 10.1002/wps.20349.
8
How has the extent of institutional mental healthcare changed in Western Europe? Analysis of data since 1990.西欧机构化精神卫生保健的规模发生了怎样的变化?对1990年以来数据的分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e010188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010188.
9
Reducing hospitalisation among people living with severe mental illness.减少重症精神疾病患者的住院率。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Apr;40(2):124-128. doi: 10.1071/AH15073.
10
Full-service partnerships among adults with serious mental illness in California: impact on utilization and costs.加利福尼亚州患有严重精神疾病的成年人之间的全方位服务伙伴关系:对医疗利用和成本的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1120-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300380.