• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与严重精神疾病患者脱离支持性独立生活项目相关的因素。

Factors associated with departure from supported independent living programs for persons with serious mental illness.

作者信息

Lee Sungeun, Wong Yin-Ling Irene, Rothbard Aileen B

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Pusan National University,Geumjung-gu, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Mar;60(3):367-73. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.367.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.367
PMID:19252050
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Supported housing is a viable model that offers independence and opportunity for community integration. However, previous studies have shown that not all residents can sustain long-term tenancy. This study examined the extent to which personal and housing characteristics predicted positive and negative departures from independent housing programs that provided support services to persons with serious mental illness.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 237 persons participating in a supported independent living program in Philadelphia. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of personal and housing characteristics on the probability of positive departure (to an arrangement with more autonomy) and negative departure (to an arrangement with more supervision or to homelessness).

RESULTS

Most participants (69%) maintained continuous residence in the program for the study period, 14% experienced a positive departure, and 17% a negative departure. A self-reported past substance abuse problem increased the probability of a negative departure, and a more supportive relationship with program staff decreased the probability. A higher income increased the probability of a positive departure, whereas a higher level of social distress in the neighborhood decreased the probability.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that long-term housing tenure was not uncommon among supported independent living residents, but some were not able to maintain independent living and were discharged to shelters, institutions, or residential settings with more supervision. Predictors of positive and negative departure identified in this study may help service providers design services to meet the various needs of persons with serious mental illness for stable independent living.

摘要

目的

支持性住房是一种可行的模式,为社区融入提供独立性和机会。然而,先前的研究表明,并非所有居民都能维持长期租赁。本研究调查了个人和住房特征在多大程度上预测了从为重度精神疾病患者提供支持服务的独立住房项目中出现的正向和负向离开情况。

方法

样本包括237名参与费城支持性独立生活项目的人员。使用Cox比例风险模型来估计个人和住房特征对正向离开(转向更自主的安排)和负向离开(转向更受监督的安排或无家可归)概率的影响。

结果

在研究期间,大多数参与者(69%)持续居住在该项目中,14%经历了正向离开,17%经历了负向离开。自我报告的过去药物滥用问题增加了负向离开的概率,而与项目工作人员更支持性的关系则降低了该概率。较高的收入增加了正向离开的概率,而邻里中较高水平的社会困扰则降低了该概率。

结论

研究结果表明,在支持性独立生活居民中,长期住房保有情况并不罕见,但有些人无法维持独立生活,被安置到监管更严格的庇护所、机构或居住场所。本研究中确定的正向和负向离开的预测因素可能有助于服务提供者设计服务,以满足重度精神疾病患者对稳定独立生活的各种需求。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with departure from supported independent living programs for persons with serious mental illness.与严重精神疾病患者脱离支持性独立生活项目相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Mar;60(3):367-73. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.367.
2
Tracking residential outcomes of supported independent living programs for persons with serious mental illness.追踪针对严重精神疾病患者的支持性独立生活项目的居住成果。
Eval Program Plann. 2008 Nov;31(4):416-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
3
The new asylums in the community: severely ill psychiatric patients living in psychiatric supported housing facilities. A Danish register-based study of prognostic factors, use of psychiatric services, and mortality.社区中的新庇护所:居住在精神科支持性住房设施中的重病精神病患者。一项基于丹麦登记的预后因素、精神科服务使用情况和死亡率的研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;47(8):1251-61. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0432-2. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
4
Housing satisfaction and service use by mentally ill persons in community integrated living arrangements.社区综合生活安排中精神病患者的住房满意度与服务利用情况
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Sep;52(9):1206-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1206.
5
Social inclusion of people with severe mental illness living in community housing programs.社区住房项目中严重精神疾病患者的社会包容。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1102-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100538.
6
Housing preferences and perceptions of health and functioning among homeless mentally ill persons.无家可归的精神病患者的住房偏好以及对健康和功能的认知
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Apr;47(4):381-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.4.381.
7
Social integration of people with serious mental illness: network transactions and satisfaction.重度精神疾病患者的社会融入:网络交往与满意度
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan;38(1):51-67. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9203-1. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
8
Objective community integration of mental health consumers living in supported housing and of others in the community.促进居住在支持性住房中的精神健康消费者以及社区中的其他人融入社区。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(5):438-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100397.
9
The cost-effectiveness of independent housing for the chronically mentally ill: do housing and neighborhood features matter?为慢性精神病患者提供独立住房的成本效益:住房和社区特征重要吗?
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1341-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00293.x.
10
A review of research on residential programs for people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders.对针对重度精神疾病患者及并发物质使用障碍患者的住院治疗项目的研究综述。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004 Dec;23(4):471-81. doi: 10.1080/09595230412331324590.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Medicaid Expenditures Increase After Adults Exit Permanent Supportive Housing?成年人退出永久性支持性住房后,医疗补助支出会增加吗?
Hous Policy Debate. 2024;34(1):148-155. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2112609. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
Managing high-risk behaviours and challenges to prevent housing loss in permanent supportive housing: a rapid review.管理高风险行为和挑战,以防止永久性支持性住房中的住房损失:快速审查。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Sep 29;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00873-z.
3
Permanent Supportive Housing Tenure Among a Heterogeneous Population of Adults with Disabilities.
永久性支持性住房居住权在具有不同残疾的成年人中的应用。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Apr;25(2):227-234. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0348.
4
The Effectiveness of Mental Health Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.心理健康康复服务的有效性:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 13;11:607933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607933. eCollection 2020.
5
"I achieved being an adult": A Qualitative Exploration of Voluntary Transitions from Permanent Supportive Housing.“我成为了成年人”:对从永久性支持性住房中自愿过渡的质性探索
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jan;48(1):9-22. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01036-z.
6
Mental health supported accommodation services: a systematic review of mental health and psychosocial outcomes.心理健康支持性住宿服务:心理健康和心理社会结局的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 15;18(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1725-8.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can J Commun Ment Health. 2012 Jul 2;31(1):67-85. doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-2012-0006.
8
Risk factors associated with recurrent homelessness after a first homeless episode.首次经历无家可归后与反复无家可归相关的风险因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jul;50(5):505-13. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9608-4. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
9
Residential mobility among individuals with severe mental illness: cohort study of UK700 participants.精神疾病患者的居住流动性:英国 700 名参与者的队列研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;45(8):767-77. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0115-4. Epub 2009 Aug 15.