• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2021 年 8 月至 11 月,捷克基于人群和检测特征的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断的作用。

Role of population and test characteristics in antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, Czechia, August to November 2021.

机构信息

Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia.

Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

Euro Surveill. 2022 Aug;27(33). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.33.2200070.

DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.33.2200070
PMID:35983773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9389858/
Abstract

BackgroundAnalyses of diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (AG-RDTs) based on long-term data, population subgroups and many AG-RDT types are scarce.AimWe aimed to analyse sensitivity and specificity of AG-RDTs for subgroups based on age, incidence, sample type, reason for test, symptoms, vaccination status and the AG-RDT's presence on approved lists.MethodsWe included AG-RDT results registered in Czechia's Information System for Infectious Diseases between August and November 2021. Subpopulations were analysed based on 346,000 test results for which a confirmatory PCR test was recorded ≤ 3 days after the AG-RDT; 38 AG-RDTs with more than 100 PCR-positive and 300 PCR-negative samples were individually evaluated.ResultsAverage sensitivity and specificity were 72.4% and 96.7%, respectively. We recorded lower sensitivity for age groups 0-12 (65.5%) and 13-18 years (65.3%). The sensitivity level rose with increasing SARS-CoV-2 incidence from 66.0% to 76.7%. Nasopharyngeal samples had the highest sensitivity and saliva the lowest. Sensitivity for preventive reasons was 63.6% vs 86.1% when testing for suspected infection. Sensitivity was 84.8% when one or more symptoms were reported compared with 57.1% for no symptoms. Vaccination was associated with a 4.2% higher sensitivity. Significantly higher sensitivity levels pertained to AG-RDTs on the World Health Organization Emergency Use List (WHO EUL), European Union Common List and the list of the United Kingdom's Department of Health and Social Care.ConclusionAG-RDTs from approved lists should be considered, especially in situations associated with lower viral load. Results are limited to SARS-CoV-2 delta variant.

摘要

背景

基于长期数据、人群亚组和多种 AG-RDT 类型对 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断检测(AG-RDT)的诊断性能进行分析的情况较为少见。

目的

我们旨在根据年龄、发病率、样本类型、检测原因、症状、疫苗接种状况以及 AG-RDT 在批准清单上的存在情况,分析 AG-RDT 在亚组中的敏感性和特异性。

方法

我们纳入了 2021 年 8 月至 11 月期间在捷克传染病信息系统中登记的 AG-RDT 结果。基于记录了在 AG-RDT 后 ≤3 天内进行的确认性 PCR 检测结果的 346000 个检测结果,对亚组进行了分析;对 38 种具有超过 100 个 PCR 阳性和 300 个 PCR 阴性样本的 AG-RDT 进行了单独评估。

结果

平均敏感性和特异性分别为 72.4%和 96.7%。我们记录到 0-12 岁(65.5%)和 13-18 岁(65.3%)年龄组的敏感性较低。随着 SARS-CoV-2 发病率从 66.0%增加到 76.7%,敏感性水平也随之上升。鼻咽样本的敏感性最高,唾液样本的敏感性最低。出于预防目的进行检测时的敏感性为 63.6%,而怀疑感染时的敏感性为 86.1%。有一个或多个症状报告时的敏感性为 84.8%,而无症状时的敏感性为 57.1%。接种疫苗与敏感性提高 4.2%有关。在世界卫生组织(WHO)紧急使用清单(EUL)、欧盟共同清单和英国卫生部和社会保障部清单上的 AG-RDT 的敏感性水平更高。

结论

应考虑使用获得批准的清单中的 AG-RDT,尤其是在病毒载量较低的情况下。结果仅限于 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔变异株。

相似文献

1
Role of population and test characteristics in antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, Czechia, August to November 2021.2021 年 8 月至 11 月,捷克基于人群和检测特征的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断的作用。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Aug;27(33). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.33.2200070.
2
Can variants, reinfection, symptoms and test types affect COVID-19 diagnostic performance? A large-scale retrospective study of AG-RDTs during circulation of Delta and Omicron variants, Czechia, December 2021 to February 2022.变异株、再感染、症状和检测类型是否会影响 COVID-19 的诊断性能?在德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株流行期间对 AG-RDT 进行的一项大型回顾性研究,捷克,2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Sep;28(38). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.38.2200938.
3
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.实时荧光 RT-PCR 与抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较评估:性能、变异株特异性和临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests.基于豆提取物的含漱液可用于使用快速抗原检测高效诊断活动性 COVID-19 感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0161421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01614-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test sensitivity and viral load in newly symptomatic hospital employees in Berlin, Germany, December, 2020 to February, 2022: an observational study.2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间德国柏林新出现症状的住院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的敏感性和病毒载量:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Jun;5(6):e538-e546. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00412-3. Epub 2024 May 14.
7
Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 CerTest 和 Panbio 抗原快速诊断检测的诊断性能。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104781. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
8
[Evaluation of two COVID-19 antigenic diagnostic tests: and compared to ].[两种新冠病毒抗原诊断检测的评估:与……相比的……和……] (由于原文中具体的检测名称缺失,翻译可能不够完整准确)
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Aug 6;39:228. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.228.30752. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of the Humasis COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.评估 Humasis COVID-19 抗原快速诊断检测试剂盒用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2024 Jan;54(1):126-130.
10
Virus variant-specific clinical performance of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test with focus on Omicron variants of concern.关注关注的奥密克戎变异株,一种 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的病毒变异株特异性临床性能。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Aug;29(8):1085.e1-1085.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of facemask sampling for the detection of infectious individuals with SARS-CoV-2 in high stakes clinical examinations - a feasibility study.在高风险临床检查中实施口罩采样以检测感染新冠病毒的个体——一项可行性研究
Future Healthc J. 2024 Sep 5;11(4):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100175. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于仪器的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断检测的临床准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5.
3
Can variants, reinfection, symptoms and test types affect COVID-19 diagnostic performance? A large-scale retrospective study of AG-RDTs during circulation of Delta and Omicron variants, Czechia, December 2021 to February 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in detecting Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.鼻咽拭子和唾液在检测 Delta 和 Omicron SARS-CoV-2 变异株中的表现。
J Med Virol. 2022 Oct;94(10):4704-4711. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27898. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
Rapid comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests.SARS-CoV-2 快速床旁抗原检测的快速比较评估。
Infection. 2022 Oct;50(5):1281-1293. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01810-1. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
SARS-CoV-2 viral-load distribution reveals that viral loads increase with age: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.
变异株、再感染、症状和检测类型是否会影响 COVID-19 的诊断性能?在德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株流行期间对 AG-RDT 进行的一项大型回顾性研究,捷克,2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Sep;28(38). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.38.2200938.
4
Infection of the oral cavity with SARS-CoV-2 variants: Scope of salivary diagnostics.口腔感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变异株:唾液诊断的范围
Front Oral Health. 2022 Oct 31;3:1001790. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.1001790. eCollection 2022.
SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量分布显示病毒载量随年龄增长而增加:一项回顾性横断面队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;50(6):1795-1803. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab145. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021.建立一个样本面板,用于分散式技术评估 31 种用于 SARS-CoV-2 抗原的快速诊断检测试剂的敏感性,德国,2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442.
5
Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021.2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月德国对 122 种经 CE 标记的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断检测试剂的比较敏感性评估。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100441.
6
False positive rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in the real-world and their economic burden.新冠病毒在现实世界中的快速抗原检测假阳性及其经济负担。
J Infect. 2022 Feb;84(2):248-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Testing in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Children in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中症状性和无症状儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测诊断准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0099121. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00991-21.
9
COVID-19: Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing.新型冠状病毒肺炎:基于侧向流动分析法的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2快速抗原检测:大规模检测敏感性和特异性的全国性系统评估
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun;36:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100924. Epub 2021 May 30.
10
Initial report of decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine.接种 BNT162b2 疫苗后 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量下降的初步报告。
Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):790-792. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01316-7. Epub 2021 Mar 29.