Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico.
Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104733. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104733. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
We assessed spatiotemporal distribution of behavior as a function of the spatial and temporal arrangement of food delivery. Eight food-deprived rats were exposed in an extended experimental chamber to a continuous reinforcement schedule (CRf) or to a fixed interval (FI) 30 s, with three levers contiguous to food dispenser or placed on separate panels. Responses on any of the levers were equally operative on the ongoing schedule. All rats moved mainly near to dispenser and levers when these were contiguous, under both, CRf and FI schedules, although distribution of responses on different levers was more variant under FI than under CRf. With separate levers, rats traveled through a larger area of the experimental space, especially under FI. Distribution of responses showed more variation under FI than under CRf schedule. Under FI, response patterns consisted in a post-meal pause followed by an acceleration towards the next food. Findings are discussed in the context of studies in which have been reported inconsistent patterns under FI schedules when are manipulated the number of operanda, dispensers, and their locations. It is highlighted the relevance of continuous analysis of rats' displacement, to account for the configuration of response patterns observed in this study.
我们评估了行为的时空分布,作为食物传递的时空排列的函数。八只禁食的老鼠在一个扩展的实验室内暴露于连续强化时间表(CRf)或固定间隔(FI)30 秒,有三个操纵杆与食物分配器相邻或放置在单独的面板上。在进行中的时间表上,任何一个操纵杆的反应都是同样有效的。当这些操纵杆相邻时,所有老鼠主要在分配器和操纵杆附近移动,无论是在 CRf 还是 FI 时间表下,尽管在 FI 下,不同操纵杆上的反应分布比在 CRf 下更具变异性。使用单独的操纵杆时,老鼠在实验空间中移动的面积更大,尤其是在 FI 下。FI 下的反应模式包括餐后暂停,然后加速到下一次进食。这些发现是在已经报道了在操纵操作数、分配器及其位置时 FI 时间表下出现不一致模式的研究背景下进行讨论的。突出了连续分析老鼠位移的相关性,以解释在这项研究中观察到的反应模式的配置。