Cohen S L, Richardson J, Klebez J, Febbo S, Tucker D
Department of Psychology, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania 17815, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2001 Sep;26(3):179-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1011325519568.
Biofeedback was used to increase forearm-muscle tension. Feedback was delivered under continuous reinforcement (CRF), variable interval (VI), fixed interval (FI), variable ratio (VR), and fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement when college students increased their muscle tension (electromyograph, EMG) above a high threshold. There were three daily sessions of feedback, and Session 3 was immediately followed by a session without feedback (extinction). The CRF schedule resulted in the highest EMG, closely followed by the FR and VR schedules, and the lowest EMG scores were produced by the FI and VI schedules. Similarly, the CRF schedule resulted in the greatest amount of time-above-threshold and the VI and FI schedules produced the lowest time-above-threshold. The highest response rates were generated by the FR schedule, followed by the VR schedule. The CRF schedule produced relatively low response rates, comparable to the rates under the VI and FI schedules. Some of the data are consistent with the partial-reinforcement-extinction effect. The present data suggest that different schedules of feedback should be considered in muscle-strengthening-contexts such as during the rehabilitation of muscles following brain damage or peripheral nervous-system injury.
生物反馈被用于增加前臂肌肉张力。当大学生将其肌肉张力(肌电图,EMG)提高到高于高阈值时,在连续强化(CRF)、可变间隔(VI)、固定间隔(FI)、可变比率(VR)和固定比率(FR)强化程序下提供反馈。每天有三次反馈环节,在第3次环节之后紧接着是一次无反馈环节(消退)。CRF程序导致最高的肌电图,紧随其后的是FR和VR程序,而FI和VI程序产生的肌电图分数最低。同样,CRF程序导致高于阈值的时间最长,而VI和FI程序产生的高于阈值的时间最短。FR程序产生的反应率最高,其次是VR程序。CRF程序产生的反应率相对较低,与VI和FI程序下的反应率相当。一些数据与部分强化消退效应一致。目前的数据表明,在肌肉强化情境中,如脑损伤或周围神经系统损伤后的肌肉康复过程中,应考虑不同的反馈程序。