Social connectedness, emotional regulation, and health behaviors as correlates of distress during lockdown for COVID-19: A diary study.

Mass lockdowns are a powerful infection-reduction strategy but are a significant stressor. This study aimed to explore whether various factors known to predict distress in normal contexts (e.g. social connectedness, emotional-regulation strategies, and health-related behaviors) are associated with daily distress under lockdown conditions. A time-based diary study evaluated how perceived social connectedness, health-promoting, and risk behaviors predicted within-person and between-person psychological distress. One hundred and nine adults completed surveys on these variables daily for 15 days while under stringent COVID-19 lockdown in Colombia. Emotional suppression and reappraisal were measured at the start of the study to explore whether they predicted distress. Distress was lower on the days that people experienced greater social connectedness (within-person analyses) but was not significantly predicted by between-participant differences in emotional regulation. Health-promoting behaviors such as exercising and meaningful activity were associated with lower distress, while watching COVID-19 news and eating high-calorie food were associated with higher distress. Looking at individual dynamics provides meaningful insights on daily behaviors associated with distress that might improve people's wellbeing during lockdown, such as social connectedness, meaningful activity, nutrition, exercise, and minimizing news exposure. Future research with alternative designs will enable causal conclusions to be drawn.