Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2022 Nov 1;91(5):701-709. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002093. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for glioblastoma (GBM) has been reserved for poor surgical candidates and deep "inoperable" lesions. We present the first reported series of LITT for surgically accessible recurrent GBM (rGBM) that would otherwise be treated with surgical resection.
To evaluate the use of LITT for unifocal, lobar, first-time rGBM compared with a similar surgical cohort.
A retrospective institutional database was used to identify patients with unifocal, lobar, first-time rGBM who underwent LITT or resection between 2013 and 2020. Clinical and volumetric lesional characteristics were compared between cohorts. Subgroup analysis of patients with lesions ≤20 cm 3 was also completed. Primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival.
Of the 744 patients with rGBM treated from 2013 to 2020, a LITT cohort of 17 patients were compared with 23 similar surgical patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, although lesions were larger in the surgical cohort (7.54 vs 4.37 cm 3 , P = .017). Despite differences in lesion size, both cohorts had similar extents of ablation/resection (90.7% vs 95.1%, P = .739). Overall survival (14.1 vs 13.8 months, P = .578) and progression-free survival (3.7 vs 3.3 months, P = 0. 495) were similar. LITT patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (2.2 vs 3.0 days, P = .004). Subgroup analysis of patients with lesions ≤20 cm 3 showed similar outcomes, with LITT allowing for significantly shorter hospital stays.
We found no difference in survival outcomes or morbidity between LITT and repeat surgery for surgically accessible rGBM while LITT resulted in shorter hospital stays and more efficient postoperative care.
激光间质热疗(LITT)治疗胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)一直保留给手术条件差和深部“无法手术”病变的患者。我们报告了首例 LITT 治疗可手术复发性 GBM(rGBM)的系列病例,这些患者如果采用手术切除治疗则属于“无法手术”的情况。
评估 LITT 治疗单发、叶性、首次 rGBM 的效果,与类似的手术组进行比较。
回顾性分析 2013 年至 2020 年间接受 LITT 或切除术治疗的单发、叶性、首次 rGBM 患者的机构数据库。比较两组患者的临床和容积病变特征。还对病变≤20cm 3 的患者进行了亚组分析。主要结局是总生存期和无进展生存期。
在 2013 年至 2020 年间治疗的 744 例 rGBM 患者中,17 例 LITT 组患者与 23 例相似的手术组患者进行了比较。两组患者的基线特征无差异,尽管手术组的病变更大(7.54cm 3 比 4.37cm 3 ,P=0.017)。尽管病变大小不同,但两组患者的消融/切除范围相似(90.7%比 95.1%,P=0.739)。总生存期(14.1 个月比 13.8 个月,P=0.578)和无进展生存期(3.7 个月比 3.3 个月,P=0.495)相似。LITT 患者的住院时间明显缩短(2.2 天比 3.0 天,P=0.004)。病变≤20cm 3 的患者亚组分析显示,LITT 也能获得相似的结局,但 LITT 能显著缩短住院时间。
我们发现对于可手术的 rGBM,LITT 与重复手术在生存结果或发病率方面没有差异,而 LITT 导致住院时间更短,术后护理更有效。