Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Department of Bioengineering and Biomaterials, INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) 1121, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
J Endod. 2022 Nov;48(11):1421-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate torsional, dynamic, and static cyclic fatigue resistance of the reciprocating One RECI (OR; Micromega, Besançon, France), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), rotary One Curve (OC, MicroMega), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN X2; Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC) instruments.
A total of 120 OR (n = 30), WOG (n = 30), OC (n = 30), and PTN X2 (n = 30) nickel-titanium instruments were used. Torque and rotation angle until failure under static torsion loading were measured according to ISO 3630-1. Static and dynamic fatigue resistance was measured as the time to fracture in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60° angle and 5-mm radius of curvature at intracanal temperature. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test. The alpha-type error was set at 5%. Fracture instruments from torsion and fatigue tests were examined with a scanning electron microscope.
OR showed higher static fatigue resistance and rotation angle at fracture than WOG, OC, and PTN X2 (P < .05). WOG exhibited higher torsional resistance than the others (P < .05). The cyclic fatigue tests in dynamic mode had higher TTF than static for the PTN X2 and WOG groups (P < .05). In the dynamic tests, OR and WOG showed higher TTF than OC and PTN X2 (P < .05).
Under these experimental conditions, One RECI exhibited suitable mechanical properties with the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angle of rotation among the tested instruments.
本研究旨在评估往复式 One RECI(OR;Micromega,Besançon,法国)、WaveOne Gold(WOG;Dentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士)、旋转式 One Curve(OC,MicroMega)和 ProTaper Next X2(PTN X2;Dentsply Sirona,Charlotte,NC)仪器的扭转、动态和静态循环疲劳强度。
共使用了 120 根 OR(n=30)、WOG(n=30)、OC(n=30)和 PTN X2(n=30)镍钛器械。根据 ISO 3630-1 标准,测量静态扭转加载下直至器械失效时的扭矩和旋转角度。在 60°角和 5mm 曲率半径的人工不锈钢管内,以根管内温度下测量静态和动态疲劳强度,以断裂时间表示。采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验对结果进行分析,设定 α 型错误为 5%。对扭转和疲劳试验中折断的器械进行扫描电子显微镜检查。
OR 的静态疲劳强度和断裂时的旋转角度均高于 WOG、OC 和 PTN X2(P<.05)。WOG 的抗扭强度高于其他组(P<.05)。对于 PTN X2 和 WOG 组,动态模式下的循环疲劳试验的 TTF 高于静态模式(P<.05)。在动态试验中,OR 和 WOG 的 TTF 高于 OC 和 PTN X2(P<.05)。
在这些实验条件下,One RECI 表现出适宜的机械性能,在测试的器械中具有最高的循环疲劳强度和旋转角度。