Suppr超能文献

一线 FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇化疗对晚期胰腺癌患者生存的影响:来自前瞻性国际多中心 PURPLE 胰腺癌登记研究的数据。

Impact of first-line FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel chemotherapy on survival in advanced pancreatic cancer: Evidence from the prospective international multicentre PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry.

机构信息

Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; The Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC, Australia.

The Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2022 Oct;174:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.042. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

First-line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been compared in head-to-head phase III randomised controlled trials (RCT). Data on optimum first-line treatment and subsequent sequencing is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) between first-line treatment regimens in a real-world population to determine if an optimal therapeutic sequence is associated with survival benefit.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collated data from the Australasian PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry was undertaken.

FINDINGS

From 2016 to 2020, of 1551 pancreatic cancer patients, 615 received palliative-intent chemotherapy. Patients with early-stage resected disease without recurrence (n = 369), radiotherapy alone (n = 43), received supportive care alone (n = 458) or had less than 3 months follow-up (n = 66) were excluded. Median OS was comparable between patients receiving first-line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 376) and those receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 73) (11.3 versus 12.3 months, P = 0.37), with 38% proceeding to second-line chemotherapy which was associated with longer mOS compared to first-line treatment alone (17.4 versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001). With second-line treatment following prior FOLFIRINOX (n = 29) or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 101), mOS did not differ significantly (17.3 versus 15.9 months, P = 0.92), respectively, whilst median progression-free survival was longer with prior FOLFIRINOX (5.2 versus 2.9 months, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in overall survival between either first-line chemotherapy choice, despite patients receiving FOLFIRINOX being younger, fitter, and more likely to have localised disease. However, FOLFIRINOX was associated with delayed progression. In the absence of phase III RCT data, clinicians should be comfortable using either Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced PDAC.

摘要

背景

在头对头的三期随机对照试验(RCT)中,尚未比较晚期胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的一线姑息化疗方案。缺乏关于最佳一线治疗和后续治疗顺序的数据。

目的

比较真实世界人群中一线治疗方案的总生存期(OS),以确定是否存在与生存获益相关的最佳治疗顺序。

方法

对前瞻性收集的澳大利亚 PURPLE 胰腺癌登记处的数据进行回顾性分析。

发现

2016 年至 2020 年,共纳入 1551 例胰腺癌患者,其中 615 例接受姑息化疗。排除了早期手术切除且无复发的患者(n=369)、单纯放疗的患者(n=43)、单纯接受支持性治疗的患者(n=458)或随访时间少于 3 个月的患者(n=66)。接受一线吉西他滨/ Nab-紫杉醇(n=376)和接受 FOLFIRINOX(n=73)的患者的中位 OS 相当(11.3 与 12.3 个月,P=0.37),38%的患者接受二线化疗,与单独一线治疗相比,mOS 更长(17.4 与 8.2 个月,P<0.001)。先前接受 FOLFIRINOX(n=29)或吉西他滨/ Nab-紫杉醇(n=101)治疗的患者,二线治疗后的 mOS 无显著差异(17.3 与 15.9 个月,P=0.92),而中位无进展生存期更长的患者接受了先前的 FOLFIRINOX(5.2 与 2.9 个月,P=0.03)。

结论

尽管接受 FOLFIRINOX 的患者年龄更小、身体更健康且更可能患有局限性疾病,但两种一线化疗方案的总生存期无显著差异。然而,FOLFIRINOX 与进展延迟相关。在缺乏 III 期 RCT 数据的情况下,临床医生应能够使用吉西他滨/ Nab-紫杉醇或 FOLFIRINOX 作为晚期 PDAC 的一线治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验