Kim Sung Eun, Ko Ryoung-Eun, Na Soo Jin, Chung Chi Ryang, Choi Ki Hong, Kim Darae, Park Taek Kyu, Lee Joo Myung, Song Young Bin, Choi Jin-Oh, Hahn Joo-Yong, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol, Yang Jeong Hoon
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 3;9:947149. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.947149. eCollection 2022.
No data is available on delirium prediction models in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), although preexisting delirium prediction models [PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early PREdiction of DELIRium in ICu patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC)] were developed and validated based on a population admitted to the general intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, we externally validated the usefulness of the PRE-DELIRIC and E-PRE-DELIRIC models and compared their predictive performance in patients admitted to the CICU.
A total of 2,724 patients admitted to the CICU were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2018. Delirium was defined as at least one positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) which was screened at least once every 8 h. The PRE-DELIRIC value was calculated within 24 h of CICU admission, and the E-PRE-DELIRIC value was calculated at CICU admission. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and the calibration slope was assessed graphically by plotting.
Delirium occurred in 677 patients (24.8%) when the patients were assessed thrice daily until 7 days of the CICU stay. The AUROC curve for the prediction of delirium was significantly greater for PRE-DELIRIC values [0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.86] than for E-PRE-DELIRIC values (0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.80) [z score of -6.24 ( < 0.001)]. Net reclassification improvement for the prediction of delirium increased by 0.27 (95% CI: 0.21-0.32, < 0.001). Calibration was acceptable in the PRE-DELIRIC model (Hosmer-Lemeshow = 0.170) but not in the E-PRE-DELIRIC model (Hosmer-Lemeshow < 0.001).
Although both models have good predictive performance for the development of delirium, even in critically ill cardiac patients, the performance of the PRE-DELIRIC model might be superior to that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model. Further studies are required to confirm our results and design a specific delirium prediction model for CICU patients.
尽管已有的谵妄预测模型[重症监护病房(ICU)患者谵妄预测模型(PRE-DELIRIC)和ICU患者谵妄早期预测模型(E-PRE-DELIRIC)]是基于入住综合ICU的人群开发并验证的,但尚无关于心脏重症监护病房(CICU)谵妄预测模型的数据。因此,我们对外验证了PRE-DELIRIC和E-PRE-DELIRIC模型的有效性,并比较了它们在入住CICU患者中的预测性能。
2012年9月至2018年12月期间,共有2724例入住CICU的患者纳入研究。谵妄定义为至少一次ICU意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)呈阳性,该评估每8小时至少进行一次。在入住CICU的24小时内计算PRE-DELIRIC值,在入住CICU时计算E-PRE-DELIRIC值。使用受试者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积评估模型的预测性能,并通过绘图以图形方式评估校准斜率。
在对患者进行每日三次评估直至CICU住院7天期间,677例患者(24.8%)发生了谵妄。PRE-DELIRIC值预测谵妄的AUROC曲线[0.84,95%置信区间(CI):0.82-0.86]显著高于E-PRE-DELIRIC值(0.79,95%CI:0.77-0.80)[z值为-6.24(<0.001)]。谵妄预测的净重新分类改善增加了0.27(95%CI:0.21-0.32,<0.001)。PRE-DELIRIC模型的校准是可接受的(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验值=0.170),但E-PRE-DELIRIC模型不可接受(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验值<0.001)。
尽管这两种模型对谵妄的发生都有良好的预测性能,即使在危重心脏病患者中也是如此,但PRE-DELIRIC模型的性能可能优于E-PRE-DELIRIC模型。需要进一步研究以证实我们的结果,并为CICU患者设计特定的谵妄预测模型。