Brummer Julie, Bloomfield Kim, Karriker-Jaffe Katherine J, Pedersen Michael Mulbjerg, Hesse Morten
Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Addiction. 2023 Jan;118(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/add.16034. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Most studies validating the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) have either assessed its factor structure and/or test-retest reliability or used diagnostic interviews as validators of current alcohol use disorders. The aim of the present study was to determine whether AUDIT and AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores are associated with subsequent risk of hospital admission for alcohol-related disorders and diseases (ARDDs).
We used a historical cohort study. Using national registers, survey respondents were tracked from 1 September 2011 to hospitalization for an ARDD, emigration, death, or 31 December 2018, whichever occurred first.
Denmark.
Respondents (n = 4522) from a Danish national survey conducted in autumn 2011.
Outcome was incident ARDD admission recorded in the National Patient Register. Predictors were AUDIT and AUDIT-C scores, and covariates were age, gender, highest level of education and previous psychiatric disorder.
During the study period, 56 respondents had a first-time ARDD admission. Respondents who scored above the 8-point AUDIT cut-off and respondents who scored above the 5-point AUDIT-C cut-off had a significantly increased risk of being admitted for an ARDD compared with respondents who scored below the cut-offs, (AUDIT: hazard ratio (HR), 4.72; 95% CI, 2.59-8.60; AUDIT-C: HR, 7.97; 95% CI, 3.66-17.31).
Scores above alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) cut-offs are associated with an increased risk of long-term alcohol-related hospital admissions. At widely used cut-offs, the AUDIT-C is a better predictor of alcohol-related hospitalizations among members of the general population than the full AUDIT.
大多数验证酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的研究,要么评估了其因子结构和/或重测信度,要么使用诊断访谈作为当前酒精使用障碍的验证方法。本研究的目的是确定AUDIT和酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费版(AUDIT-C)得分是否与随后因酒精相关障碍和疾病(ARDDs)住院的风险相关。
我们采用了一项历史性队列研究。利用国家登记册,对调查对象从2011年9月1日开始进行跟踪,直至因ARDDs住院、移民、死亡或2018年12月31日(以先发生者为准)。
丹麦。
2011年秋季丹麦全国性调查的受访者(n = 4522)。
结局指标是国家患者登记册中记录的首次ARDDs住院情况。预测因素是AUDIT和AUDIT-C得分,协变量是年龄、性别、最高教育水平和既往精神疾病史。
在研究期间,56名受访者首次因ARDDs住院。与得分低于临界值的受访者相比,得分高于AUDIT 8分临界值和得分高于AUDIT-C 5分临界值的受访者因ARDDs住院的风险显著增加(AUDIT:风险比(HR),4.72;95%置信区间,2.59 - 8.60;AUDIT-C:HR,7.97;95%置信区间,3.66 - 17.31)。
高于酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费版(AUDIT-C)临界值的得分与长期酒精相关住院风险增加相关。在广泛使用的临界值下,对于普通人群成员,AUDIT-C比完整的AUDIT更能预测酒精相关住院情况。