• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精使用障碍识别测试的测量不变性:在不同环境和性别中建立其因子结构。

Measurement invariance of the alcohol use disorders identification test: Establishing its factor structure in different settings and across gender.

机构信息

(a)University Medicine Greifswald, Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany; (b)German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

(a)University Medicine Greifswald, Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 1;189:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.002
PMID:29879682
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is an internationally well-established screening tool for the assessment of hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. To be valid for group comparisons, the AUDIT should measure the same latent construct with the same structure across groups. This is determined by measurement invariance. So far, measurement invariance of the AUDIT has rarely been investigated. We analyzed measurement invariance across gender and samples from different settings (i.e., inpatients from general hospital, patients from general medical practices, general population).

METHODS

A sample of n = 28,345 participants from general hospitals, general medical practices and the general population was provided from six studies. First, we used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to establish the factorial structure of the AUDIT by comparing a single-factor model to a two-factor model for each group. Next, Multiple Group CFA was used to investigate measurement invariance.

RESULTS

The two-factor structure was shown to be preferable for all groups. Furthermore, strict measurement invariance was established across all groups for the AUDIT.

CONCLUSION

A two-factor structure for the AUDIT is preferred. Nevertheless, the one-factor structure also showed a good fit to the data. The findings support the AUDIT as a psychometrically valid and reliable screening instrument.

摘要

简介

酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)是一种国际上广泛使用的评估危险和有害饮酒的筛查工具。为了进行组间比较,AUDIT 应该在不同组别中测量相同的潜在结构和相同的结构。这是通过测量不变性来确定的。迄今为止,AUDIT 的测量不变性很少被研究。我们分析了性别和来自不同环境(即综合医院的住院患者、普通医疗实践中的患者、普通人群)的样本的测量不变性。

方法

从六项研究中提供了来自综合医院、普通医疗实践和普通人群的 n=28345 名参与者的样本。首先,我们使用验证性因子分析(CFA)通过比较每个组的单因素模型和双因素模型来确定 AUDIT 的因子结构。接下来,使用多组 CFA 来研究测量不变性。

结果

对于所有组别,双因素结构都显示出更优。此外,AUDIT 在所有组别中均建立了严格的测量不变性。

结论

AUDIT 的双因素结构更优。然而,单因素结构也显示出对数据的良好拟合。这些发现支持 AUDIT 作为一种具有心理测量学有效性和可靠性的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Measurement invariance of the alcohol use disorders identification test: Establishing its factor structure in different settings and across gender.酒精使用障碍识别测试的测量不变性:在不同环境和性别中建立其因子结构。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 1;189:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
Evidence for essential unidimensionality of AUDIT and measurement invariance across gender, age and education. Results from the WIRUS study.AUDIT 的基本单维性和跨性别、年龄和教育的测量不变性的证据。来自 WIRUS 研究的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Sep 1;202:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
3
Psychometric properties of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) across cross-cultural subgroups, genders, and sexual orientations: Findings from the International Sex Survey (ISS).跨文化亚组、性别和性取向的酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的心理测量特性:国际性别调查(ISS)的结果。
Compr Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;127:152427. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152427. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.法国临床及非临床成年人中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量特性
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
5
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a Sample of Military Veterans with and without PTSD.在有和没有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人样本中,酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的因子结构和测量不变性。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(8):1370-1377. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1744656. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
Gender differences in the factor structure of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in multinational general population surveys.在多国一般人群调查中,酒精使用障碍识别测试的因子结构在性别上存在差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jul 1;124(1-2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
7
Validation of the psychometric properties of cognitive fusion questionnaire. A study of the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among osteoarticular disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, depressive disorder, and general populations.认知融合问卷的心理计量特性验证。在骨关节炎疾病、糖尿病、肥胖、抑郁障碍和一般人群中对该测量方法的因子有效性和因子不变性的研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;24(5):1121-1129. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2077. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Maximizing the use of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a two-step screening tool.最大限度地利用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)作为两步筛查工具。
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107521. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107521. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
9
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test revisited: establishing its structure using nonlinear factor analysis and identifying subgroups of respondents using latent class factor analysis.再探酒精使用障碍识别测试:运用非线性因子分析确定其结构,并通过潜在类别因子分析识别受访者亚组。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1-2):71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
10
Exploration of the (Interrater) Reliability and Latent Factor Structure of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in a Sample of Dutch Probationers.荷兰缓刑犯样本中酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和药物使用障碍识别测试(DUDIT)的(评分者间)信度及潜在因素结构探究
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(10):1294-306. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.998238. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived risk of illicit drug consumption in singapore: findings from a nationwide survey.新加坡非法药物消费的感知风险:一项全国性调查的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02935-y.
2
Predictors of alcohol use disorder risk in young adults: Direct and indirect psychological paths through binge drinking.年轻成年人酒精使用障碍风险的预测因素:通过暴饮的直接和间接心理路径
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321974. eCollection 2025.
3
Clinical evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in Moshi, Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚莫希的酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的临床评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0287835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287835. eCollection 2023.
4
Excessive Drinking Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Recruited From Web-Based Resources: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.男男性行为者过度饮酒状况的横断面问卷调查研究:基于网络资源招募的研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 31;8(10):e32888. doi: 10.2196/32888.
5
Using the alcohol use disorders identification test to predict hospital admission for alcohol-related conditions in the Danish general population: a record-linkage study.使用酒精使用障碍识别测试预测丹麦普通人群中与酒精相关疾病的住院情况:一项记录链接研究。
Addiction. 2023 Jan;118(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/add.16034. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Do Differences in Drinking Attitudes and Alcohol-Related Problems Explain Differences in Sick Leave? A Multilevel Analysis of 95 Work Units Within 14 Companies From the WIRUS Study.饮酒态度和与酒精相关问题的差异是否可以解释病假的差异?来自 WIRUS 研究的 14 家公司的 95 个工作单位的多层次分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 31;10:817726. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.817726. eCollection 2022.
7
Alcohol-related consequences and the intention to seek care in treatment naïve women and men with severe alcohol use disorder.与酒精相关的后果和意图在未经治疗的严重酒精使用障碍的女性和男性中寻求治疗。
Addict Behav. 2022 Aug;131:107337. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107337. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
8
Is deployment status the critical determinant of psychosocial problems among reserve/guard soldiers?现役状态是否是预备役/国民警卫队士兵心理社会问题的关键决定因素?
Psychol Serv. 2020 Nov;17(4):461-471. doi: 10.1037/ser0000331. Epub 2019 Feb 14.