• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二语自我效能感研究的新方向:在英语公共演讲领域比较双因子和二阶模型

New Directions in L2 Self-efficacy Research: Comparing Bifactor and Second-Order Models in the English Public Speaking Domain.

机构信息

Foreign Languages Department, Changzhi University, Changzhi, 046011, China.

Department of Kinesiology and Educational Psychology, Washington State University, 1155 College Avenue, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Apr;52(2):569-587. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09910-7. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-022-09910-7
PMID:35994142
Abstract

Reflecting an alternative model comparison framework and grounded in Bandura's self-efficacy theory and in western and Chinese English Public Speaking (EPS) competences literature, we examine the possibility of a hierarchical structure of the EPS self-efficacy construct. In particular, we contrast an established first-order model of the EPS self-efficacy with two higher-order rival models, testing for subordinate (second-order model) versus nested (bifactor model) relationships in a sample of 203 Chinese EFL college students. From a theoretical perspective, the results supported the bifactor model as a strong conceptual foundation for understanding the EPS self-efficacy construct as nested. From a practical perspective, this conceptualization would allow for gauging EPS self-efficacy development both holistically and by subdomains. From a research methodology perspective, this study is among the first to bring the bifactor model into the broader field of L2 research. Other implications are discussed.

摘要

我们借鉴了一种替代的模型比较框架,以班杜拉的自我效能理论和中西方英语口语(EPS)能力文献为基础,考察了 EPS 自我效能感结构的层级结构的可能性。具体来说,我们对比了 EPS 自我效能感的一个既定一阶模型和两个高阶竞争模型,在 203 名中国 EFL 大学生样本中检验了从属(二阶模型)与嵌套(双因素模型)关系。从理论角度来看,结果支持双因素模型作为理解嵌套 EPS 自我效能感结构的有力概念基础。从实际角度来看,这种概念化可以全面和通过子领域来衡量 EPS 自我效能感的发展。从研究方法的角度来看,本研究首次将双因素模型引入到更广泛的二语研究领域。其他的影响也进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
New Directions in L2 Self-efficacy Research: Comparing Bifactor and Second-Order Models in the English Public Speaking Domain.二语自我效能感研究的新方向:在英语公共演讲领域比较双因子和二阶模型
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Apr;52(2):569-587. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09910-7. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Development and validation of scales for speaking self-efficacy: Constructs, sources, and relations.说话自我效能感量表的编制与验证:结构、来源与关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):e0297517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297517. eCollection 2024.
3
Relationships Among English Language Proficiency, Self-efficacy, Motivation, Motivational Intensity, and Achievement in an ESP/EAP Context.ESP/EAP 环境下英语水平、自我效能感、动机、动机强度与成就的关系。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):3019-3038. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-10034-9. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.中国高中英语学习者中L2毅力的验证及其对学业成绩的持久影响:一种双因素模型方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:971495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971495. eCollection 2022.
5
Construct Validation of Self-Determination Theory in Second Language Scale: The Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.第二语言量表中自我决定理论的结构效度:双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:732016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732016. eCollection 2021.
6
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
7
From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking testing: Does monitoring always monitor?从自主学习到计算机辅助综合口语测试:监控是否总能发挥监控作用?
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1028754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1028754. eCollection 2023.
8
Profiling Chinese EFL students' technology-based self-regulated English learning strategies.对中国英语外语学习者基于技术的自主英语学习策略进行分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0240094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240094. eCollection 2020.
9
The Development of Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language (L2) Speaking Related to Self-Efficacy Through Online Scaffolding: A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Analysis.通过在线支架提高第二语言(L2)口语的准确性和流畅性与自我效能感的发展:潜增长曲线建模分析。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Oct;52(5):1371-1395. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09950-7. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
A mixed-methods national study investigating key challenges in learning English as a foreign language: A Chinese college student perspective.一项关于将英语作为外语学习的关键挑战的混合方法全国性研究:中国大学生视角。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 16;13:1035819. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035819. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of co-regulation on English public speaking self-efficacy in collaborative oral presentations.在协作性口头报告中,共同调节对英语公众演讲自我效能感的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 2;15:1423607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423607. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life.生活质量的双因素模型与二阶模型比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Jun 1;41(2):189-225. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.
2
Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.特邀论文:双因素测量模型的重新发现
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
3
On the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: G is the key.贝克抑郁自评量表第二版的因子结构:G 是关键。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):136-45. doi: 10.1037/a0029228. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
4
The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying.动机、自我效能感和学习方法之间的相互作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Jun;80(Pt 2):283-305. doi: 10.1348/000709909X480563. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
5
Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn.自我效能感:学习的重要动机。
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):82-91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
6
Self-Efficacy, Motivation Constructs, and Mathematics Performance of Entering Middle School Students.初中新生的自我效能感、动机结构与数学成绩
Contemp Educ Psychol. 1999 Apr;24(2):124-139. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0991.