Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Oct;95:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
In this paper I provide a detailed history of von Neumann's "No Hidden Variables" theorem, and I argue it is a demonstration that his axiomatization mathematically captures a salient feature of the statistical transformation theory (namely, that hidden variables are incompatible). I show that this reading of von Neumann's theorem is obvious once one recalls several factors of his work. First, his axiomatization was what I call a Hilbert-style axiomatic completion; indeed, it developed from work initiated by Hilbert (and Nordheim). Second, it was responsive to specific mathematical and theoretical problems faced by Dirac and Jordan's statistical transformation theory (then called 'quantum mechanics'). Third, the axiomatization was completed across his 1927 papers and 1932 book when he identified the basic assumptions underwriting quantum mechanics, showed that these suffice for deriving the trace rule, and showed that the trace rule is incompatible with hidden variables. With this reading in mind, his claim that quantum mechanics was in "compelling logical contradiction with causality" appears as a straightforward consequence of his theorem. I conclude by reassessing the theorem's broader historical and scientific significance.
在本文中,我提供了冯·诺依曼“无隐变量”定理的详细历史,并论证了它证明了他的公理化在数学上捕捉到了统计变换理论的一个显著特征(即隐变量是不兼容的)。我表明,一旦人们回忆起他工作中的几个因素,就会明显看出对冯·诺依曼定理的这种解读。首先,他的公理化是我所谓的希尔伯特式公理完备化;事实上,它是从希尔伯特(和诺德海姆)开始的工作发展而来的。其次,它回应了狄拉克和乔丹的统计变换理论(当时称为“量子力学”)所面临的具体数学和理论问题。第三,当他确定了支撑量子力学的基本假设,并表明这些假设足以推导出迹规则,并且表明迹规则与隐变量不兼容时,他的公理化在他 1927 年的论文和 1932 年的书中完成了。有了这种解读,他关于量子力学与因果关系“在逻辑上令人信服地矛盾”的说法,就成为他定理的一个直接推论。最后,我重新评估了该定理的更广泛的历史和科学意义。