Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG), School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;310:115280. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115280. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Relatively little is known about how risky drinkers attempt to moderate their drinking in the absence of specialist support. The broader literature has identified multiple potential strategies that people use to cope with temptation when trying to control health-risk behaviours. This study aims to identify types of alcohol moderation strategies used by British adults, and to explore how concurrent alcohol consumption differs across moderation strategies, focusing on the important role of usual drinking frequency.
We use a continuous repeat cross-sectional survey and one-week drinking diary collected by the market research company Kantar; these provide detailed information on alcohol consumption during a diary week and on how individuals try to moderate alcohol use for 49,204 British adults trying to reduce their drinking from 2013 to 2019. We use Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to identify predominant types of moderation strategies. With a three-step method, we also analyse the associations between adopting different moderation strategies, measures of frequency and intensity of drinking events, and usual drinking frequency.
We found evidence of four alcohol moderation strategies: 29% of individuals use a pre-commitment-focused strategy (having fewer drinking occasions), two set of individuals adopt self-control strategies within drinking occasions (specifically 28% select smaller drinks and 5% have fewer drinks), while 38% adopt a mixed strategy that involves all three. Those using commitment tend to have a higher average consumption per drinking occasion but lower overall weekly consumption compared to those using self-control. Weekly alcohol consumption is particularly high among individuals who are usual everyday drinkers and use self-control to cut down drinking.
This analysis provides a useful platform for further work, using prospective or intervention designs, to test the relative effectiveness of different moderation strategies for alcohol consumers who want to reduce their alcohol consumption.
在缺乏专业支持的情况下,酗酒者试图控制饮酒量的风险有多大,这方面的了解相对较少。更广泛的文献已经确定了人们在试图控制健康风险行为时用来应对诱惑的多种潜在策略。本研究旨在确定英国成年人使用的酒精适度策略类型,并探讨在关注通常饮酒频率的情况下,不同的适度策略对饮酒量的影响。
我们使用连续重复横断面调查和市场研究公司 Kantar 收集的一周饮酒日记;这些数据提供了在日记周内饮酒的详细信息,以及个体试图控制酒精使用的方式,针对试图减少饮酒量的 49204 名英国成年人,我们使用潜在类别分析(LCA)来确定主要的适度策略类型。我们采用三步法,分析采用不同的适度策略、饮酒事件的频率和强度的测量值以及通常的饮酒频率之间的关联。
我们发现了四种酒精适度策略的证据:29%的个体使用预先承诺策略(减少饮酒次数),两组个体在饮酒时采用自我控制策略(具体来说,28%的个体选择较小的饮料,5%的个体减少饮酒次数),而 38%的个体采用涉及所有三种策略的混合策略。与采用自我控制的个体相比,采用承诺的个体每次饮酒的平均消费量较高,但每周总饮酒量较低。对于那些经常饮酒且采用自我控制策略减少饮酒量的个体,每周的饮酒量特别高。
这项分析为进一步的工作提供了一个有用的平台,使用前瞻性或干预性设计,测试不同的适度策略对希望减少饮酒量的酒精消费者的相对有效性。