Waks Ashten B, Martinez-King L Carolina, Santiago Gisselle, Laurent Louise C, Jacobs Marni B
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego; San Diego, CA (Dr Waks, Ms Santiago, and Drs Laurent and Jacobs).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Edinburg, TX (Dr Martinez-King).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100727. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100727. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
Threatened preterm birth is the most common reason for antepartum hospitalization in the United States, accounting for approximately 50% of these admissions. However, fewer than 10% of patients with inpatient evaluation for signs or symptoms of preterm labor ultimately deliver before term.
This study aimed to generate predictive models to assess the risk of preterm delivery and time to delivery based on clinical signs and symptoms of patients evaluated in our institution for preterm labor concerns.
This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies evaluated for signs and/or symptoms of preterm labor, including contractions, abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and short cervix, between 22 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation. Inpatient evaluations were classified by patient presentation: (1) symptomatic with cervical findings (transvaginal cervical length of <2.5 cm or cervical dilation of ≥2.0 cm), (2) asymptomatic with cervical findings, and (3) symptomatic without cervical findings. The primary outcomes included incidence of spontaneous preterm birth and interval from presentation to delivery, compared between groups. The risk of preterm delivery was evaluated using log-binomial regression, and presentation to delivery timing was assessed by survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Of 631 patients with preterm labor concerns, 96 (16%) were symptomatic with cervical findings on evaluation, 51 (8%) were asymptomatic with cervical findings, and 466 (76%) were symptomatic without cervical findings. The occurrence of preterm birth was significantly higher among symptomatic patients with cervical findings (49%) than among those with cervical findings alone (31%) or symptoms alone (11%) (P<.0001). In addition, symptomatic patients with cervical findings were significantly more likely to deliver within 48 hours (20%), 1 week (30%), 2 weeks (33%), and 1 month (43%) of presentation than patients with cervical findings alone (2%, 2%, 6%, and 10%, respectively) or symptoms alone (0.4%, 1%, 1.5%, and 5%, respectively) (P value for trend<.0001). Adjusted for gestational age at presentation and previous preterm birth, the overall risk of preterm delivery was significantly higher among patients with symptoms and cervical findings than among patients with cervical findings alone (relative risk, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-4.54) or symptoms alone (relative risk, 4.39; 95% confidence interval, 3.16-6.09). Adjusted for the same variables, symptomatic patients with cervical findings were also at higher risk of delivery over time after assessment than patients with cervical findings alone (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.90) or symptoms alone (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-2.70). The negative predictive value of these models suggested that only 1% of patients with isolated symptoms or cervical findings are at risk of preterm delivery within 1 week of initial presentation.
Symptomatic patients with cervical findings suggestive of preterm labor were at the greatest risk of preterm birth and a shorter interval from presentation to delivery. The study findings supported a risk profile that may facilitate the selection of patients most appropriate for admission and targeted management. Nonetheless, as nearly 50% of patients meeting this risk profile subsequently deliver at term, future research is needed to identify which of these patients will require intervention.
在美国,先兆早产是产前住院最常见的原因,约占此类住院病例的50%。然而,因早产迹象或症状接受住院评估的患者中,最终在足月前分娩的不到10%。
本研究旨在基于在我们机构因早产问题接受评估的患者的临床体征和症状,生成预测模型以评估早产风险和分娩时间。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为在妊娠22⁰/₇至33⁶/₇周之间因早产迹象和/或症状(包括宫缩、腹痛、阴道出血和宫颈缩短)接受评估的单胎妊娠患者。住院评估根据患者表现分类:(1)有症状且有宫颈检查结果(经阴道宫颈长度<2.5 cm或宫颈扩张≥2.0 cm),(2)无症状但有宫颈检查结果,(3)有症状但无宫颈检查结果。主要结局包括自然早产的发生率以及从就诊到分娩的间隔时间,并在组间进行比较。使用对数二项回归评估早产风险,通过生存分析和Cox比例风险模型评估就诊到分娩的时间。
在631例有早产问题的患者中,96例(16%)在评估时有症状且有宫颈检查结果,51例(8%)无症状但有宫颈检查结果,466例(76%)有症状但无宫颈检查结果。有症状且有宫颈检查结果的患者中早产的发生率(49%)显著高于仅有宫颈检查结果的患者(31%)或仅有症状的患者(11%)(P<0.0001)。此外,有症状且有宫颈检查结果的患者在就诊后48小时内(20%)、1周内(30%)、2周内(33%)和1个月内(43%)分娩的可能性显著高于仅有宫颈检查结果的患者(分别为2%、2%、6%和10%)或仅有症状的患者(分别为0.4%、1%、1.5%和5%)(趋势P值<0.0001)。在调整了就诊时的孕周和既往早产史后,有症状且有宫颈检查结果的患者的总体早产风险显著高于仅有宫颈检查结果的患者(相对风险,2.81;95%置信区间,1.74 - 4.54)或仅有症状的患者(相对风险,4.39;95%置信区间,3.16 - 6.09)。在调整相同变量后,有症状且有宫颈检查结果的患者在评估后的分娩风险也高于仅有宫颈检查结果的患者(风险比,2.06;95%置信区间,1.47 - 2.90)或仅有症状的患者(风险比,2.16;95%置信区间,1.74 - 2.70)。这些模型的阴性预测值表明,仅有孤立症状或宫颈检查结果的患者中,只有1%在初次就诊后1周内有早产风险。
有症状且有提示早产的宫颈检查结果的患者早产风险最高,从就诊到分娩的间隔时间最短。研究结果支持一种风险特征,这可能有助于选择最适合入院和针对性管理的患者。尽管如此,由于近50%符合此风险特征的患者随后足月分娩,未来需要进行研究以确定这些患者中哪些需要干预。