Frei Laurence Nathalie Irene, Carlisle Naomi, Manton Zoe, Bolten Mareike, Watson Helena A
Maternity, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
King's College London Department of Women & Children's Health, London, UK.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 22;14(3):e003104. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104.
Until April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor's review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.
The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women's wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.
Triage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.
88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.
Women presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor's review before discharge.
直到2021年4月,出现先兆早产(TPTL)和/或胎膜早破(PPROM)症状前往产科分诊的女性由医生进行分诊。根据产房产情的紧急程度,在分诊处的女性往往要长时间等待医生检查。这些延误给女性带来焦虑,也削弱了分诊助产士照顾其他女性的能力。
本项目采用质量改进的计划-实施-研究-行动方法。在干预前3个月,基线评估是女性出现TPTL和/或PPROM时等待医学检查的时间。
对分诊助产士进行培训,使其能够对孕周小于37周的早产女性进行窥器检查,以便更快地进行检查。使用2021年1月至12月收集的数据,比较助产士和医生进行检查的等待时间。
确定了88名符合条件的女性。44例(干预组)由分诊助产士进行初次评估,44例(对照组)由医生进行初次评估。干预组从到达至进行定量胎儿纤连蛋白(qfFN)检测的平均等待时间为67分钟(标准差=42.7),而对照组为127分钟(标准差=61.2)(p<0.001)。然而,到达至出院/入院的等待时间没有显著差异。
出现TPTL症状的女性由分诊助产士检查的平均速度是医生的两倍,这使得那些已排除TPTL/PPROM的女性能够迅速安心。然而,分诊处的总体等待时间相似,因为我们科室的女性目前在出院前需要医生检查。