• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管与胸外科集中复习课程对考试成绩的影响。

Impact of a focused review course in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery on test performance.

作者信息

Doty John R, Nguyen Michael, Snyder Richard J, McCann Ulysse G, Doty Donald B

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah.

Planning and Insights, Marketing and Communications, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 16;7:274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.003. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.003
PMID:36003697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390413/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Core Curriculum Review Course in Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery is a 4-day educational program consisting of 77 didactic lectures that provide a comprehensive review of the material required for surgeons preparing for the American Board of Thoracic Surgery competency written examination. The lectures are supplemented with a written syllabus and interactive audience participation system. We sought to determine whether participation in this course could improve participants' performance on a cardiothoracic subject-based test.

METHODS

Sixty-five participants attended the 2018 course. Before beginning the course lectures, a multiple-choice pretest consisting of 77 questions was administered via mobile application to gauge the participants' baseline knowledge. A second multiple-choice posttest was made available beginning 7 weeks after the course, also by mobile application.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine participants completed both the pretest and the posttest. The median pretest score was 47% (36 of 77 correct answers). The median posttest score was 61% (47 of 77 correct answers), representing an increase of 14%. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores ( = -4.36;  = .00). Overall, 25 participants (86%) improved their posttest score.

CONCLUSIONS

The core curriculum review course was successful in improving participants' performance on the course tests, indicating that the participants' fund of knowledge was likely increased by attendance at the program. Additional strategies should be considered to address particular areas of study both for individual participants and for residents currently in training.

摘要

背景

心血管和胸外科核心课程复习课程是一个为期4天的教育项目,包含77场理论讲座,为准备美国胸外科委员会资格笔试的外科医生提供全面的材料复习。讲座配有书面教学大纲和互动式听众参与系统。我们试图确定参加该课程是否能提高参与者在心胸外科主题测试中的表现。

方法

65名参与者参加了2018年的课程。在课程讲座开始前,通过移动应用程序进行了一项由77道题组成的多项选择题预测试,以评估参与者的基础知识。课程结束7周后,同样通过移动应用程序进行了第二次多项选择题后测试。

结果

29名参与者完成了预测试和后测试。预测试的中位数分数为47%(77道题中答对36道)。后测试的中位数分数为61%(77道题中答对47道),提高了14%。威尔科克森符号秩检验表明预测试和后测试分数之间存在显著差异(Z = -4.36;P = .00)。总体而言,25名参与者(86%)提高了他们的后测试分数。

结论

核心课程复习课程成功提高了参与者在课程测试中的表现,表明参加该项目可能增加了参与者的知识储备。应考虑采取其他策略,以针对个体参与者和目前正在接受培训的住院医生的特定学习领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/d38e0aa45396/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/aa5e57b14333/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/6147b53ff469/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/5cce3b87008f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/96f68bd1951f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/f1b1c4919a1a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/8b6282ee8b93/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/d38e0aa45396/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/aa5e57b14333/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/6147b53ff469/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/5cce3b87008f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/96f68bd1951f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/f1b1c4919a1a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/8b6282ee8b93/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dd9/9390413/d38e0aa45396/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a focused review course in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery on test performance.心血管与胸外科集中复习课程对考试成绩的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 16;7:274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.003. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Outcome of the Joint Council of Thoracic Surgery Education's Early Review Course Project.胸外科手术教育联合委员会早期复习课程项目的成果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1564-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.027. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Improving surgical residents' performance on written assessments of cultural competency.提高外科住院医师在文化胜任力书面评估中的表现。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;65(4):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.004.
4
Evaluation of the Educational Impact of the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics Lecture Series.泌尿外科协作在线视频教学讲座系列的教育影响评估。
Urology. 2022 Sep;167:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.032. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
5
Thoracic Surgery In-Training Exam Predicts Written But Not Oral Board Pass Rates: A 15-Year Single-Center Analysis.胸外科住院医师培训考试预测笔试通过率但不预测口试通过率:一项长达 15 年的单中心分析。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(1):121-127. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
6
Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.Boot cAMP:在实习开始时进行连续 4 年基于模拟的预备培训后的教育成果。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.007.
7
Impact of a 1-day urodynamic course on knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of urology residents.1 天尿动力学课程对泌尿科住院医师知识、观念和态度的影响。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):443-450. doi: 10.1002/nau.24581. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Nonsurgical airway management training for surgeons.面向外科医生的非手术气道管理培训。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.03.001.
9
Study habits centered on completing review questions result in quantitatively higher American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores.以完成复习题为中心的学习习惯会使美国外科医师委员会住院医师培训考试成绩在数量上更高。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Training for Radiology Residents: Lecture Versus Interactive Learning Module.放射科住院医师的肌肉骨骼超声培训:讲座与互动学习模块
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jul;23(7):789-96. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.11.018. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of a targeted Arab Board of Emergency Medicine examination preparation course on resident success rates.一门有针对性的阿拉伯急诊医学委员会考试备考课程对住院医师成功率的影响。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 20;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00818-2.
2
Commentary: Is the juice worth the squeeze?评论:榨取的汁液是否值得?
JTCVS Open. 2021 Aug 12;7:287-288. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.08.009. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Commentary: Studying studying.评论:研究学习。

本文引用的文献

1
Does cramming work? Impact of National Web-Based Thoracic Surgery Curriculum login frequency on thoracic surgery in-training exam performance.突击学习是否有效?全国网络胸外科课程登录频率对住院医师考试表现的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;156(2):922-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.166. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
2
Balancing standardized testing with personalized training in surgery.在外科手术中平衡标准化测试与个性化培训。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Dec 28;8:25-29. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S122312. eCollection 2017.
3
Impact of Moodle-Based Online Curriculum on Thoracic Surgery In-Training Examination Scores.
JTCVS Open. 2021 Aug 5;7:286. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.033. eCollection 2021 Sep.
基于Moodle的在线课程对胸外科住院医师考试成绩的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.100. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Weekly assigned reading and examinations during residency, ABSITE performance, and improved pass rates on the American Board of Surgery Examinations.住院医师培训期间的每周指定阅读和考试、美国外科委员会考试(ABSITE)成绩以及通过率的提高。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):499-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.007.
5
Evaluation of web-based learning tools: lessons learned from the thoracic surgery directors association curriculum project three-year experience.基于网络的学习工具评估:从胸外科主任协会课程项目三年经验中汲取的教训
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):802-9; discussion 809-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.052.
6
eLearning: a review of Internet-based continuing medical education.电子学习:基于互联网的继续医学教育综述
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004 Winter;24(1):20-30. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340240105.
7
Significantly improved American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores associated with weekly assigned reading and preparatory examinations.美国外科医师委员会住院医师培训考试成绩因每周指定阅读材料和预考而显著提高。
Arch Surg. 2003 Nov;138(11):1195-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1195.
8
Retooling thoracic surgery education for the 21st century.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01312-x.
9
Challenges for training thoracic surgeons in the future.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Feb;63(2):309-11. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00001-5.
10
Curriculum change for graduate education in thoracic surgery.胸外科研究生教育的课程变革
Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 May;55(5):1332-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90084-u.