Al-Hmadi Sirageddin, Erol Funda, Guven Celik Melahat
Private practice, Istanbul Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University, IstanbulTurkey.
Eur Oral Res. 2022 May 5;56(2):55-60. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022962372.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling.
Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n=10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling.
Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively.
The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.
本研究旨在调查五种瓷修复系统对复合材料和氧化锆基体剪切粘结强度的影响,并确定热循环后的粘结失效模式。
将圆盘形氧化锆样本(n=50)根据修复系统类型分为五组(n=10)。每种修复系统应用于锆样本,并使用混合复合材料进行修复。热循环后,使用万能试验机对所有组进行剪切粘结测试。
除单键修复系统外,各修复系统在修复氧化锆方面无显著差异。单键修复系统在修复基体方面是最弱的。氧化锆组的最高和最低平均粘结强度值分别为18.91MPa和3.63MPa。
Ivoclar、Clearfil和Bisco这三种修复系统在修复氧化锆方面比单键修复系统和Ultradent修复系统更有效,且它们的粘结失效模式既有混合模式也有粘结模式。