Chen Qiyang, Shi Baixue, Zheng Yang, Hu Xiangdong
Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Institute of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 8;9:943844. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.943844. eCollection 2022.
Shear wave elastography (SWE) is widely used in clinical work. But there is no standard protocol and operation specification for SWE acquisition methods, which impacts the diagnosis and clinical staging. This study aimed to investigate the influence factors of diameter, depth, and stiffness on SWE using different probes at superficial depths and discuss SWE differences with two machines at superficial depths. We performed SWE on two elastic phantoms that each phantom contained six subjects with two stiffness (41.06 ± 4.62 kpa and 57.30 ± 4.31 kpa), three diameters (10, 15, and 18 mm), and two depths (15 and 25 mm). A total of 240 measurements were obtained by using two ultrasound machines (SuperSonic Imagine Aixplorer and Mindray Resona 7) and 4 probes (SL15-4 and SL10-2, L11-3, and L14-5). The measurements were compared among 4 probes, 3 diameters, and 2 depths. There was no significant difference in SWE measurements among the probes from the same machine. The SWE measurements were affected by diameter, and the degree of influence was related to the stiffness. The SWE measurements were unaffected at a 15-25 mm depth range.
剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在临床工作中被广泛应用。但SWE采集方法尚无标准方案和操作规范,这影响了诊断和临床分期。本研究旨在探讨浅表深度使用不同探头时,直径、深度和硬度对SWE的影响因素,并讨论浅表深度两台机器的SWE差异。我们对两个弹性体模进行了SWE检查,每个体模包含六个对象,具有两种硬度(41.06±4.62千帕和57.30±4.31千帕)、三种直径(10、15和18毫米)和两种深度(15和25毫米)。使用两台超声机器(SuperSonic Imagine Aixplorer和迈瑞Resona 7)和4个探头(SL15 - 4和SL10 - 2、L11 - 3和L14 - 5)共获得240次测量值。对4个探头、3种直径和2种深度的测量值进行比较。同一台机器的探头之间SWE测量值无显著差异。SWE测量值受直径影响,影响程度与硬度有关。在15 - 25毫米深度范围内,SWE测量值不受影响。