• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据倡议(CanREValue):过程和经验教训。

Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.

Ontario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 7;29(8):5616-5626. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080443.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29080443
PMID:36005181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406430/
Abstract

The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration established the Engagement Working Group (WG) to ensure that all key stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input into the development and implementation of the CanREValue Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework. Two consultations were held in 2021 to solicit patient perspectives on key policy and data access issues identified in the interim policy and data WG reports. Over 30 individuals, representing patients, caregivers, advocacy leaders, and individuals engaged in patient research were invited to participate. The consultations provided important feedback and valuable lessons in patient engagement. Patient leaders actively shaped the process and content of the consultation. Breakout groups facilitated by patient advocacy leaders gave the opportunity for open and thoughtful contributions from all participants. Important recommendations were made: the RWE framework should not impede access to new drugs; it should be used to support conditional approvals; patient relevant endpoints should be captured in provincial datasets; access to data to conduct RWE should be improved; and privacy issues must be considered. The manuscript documents the CanREValue experience of engaging patients in a consultative process and the useful contributions that can be achieved when the processes to engage are guided by patients themselves.

摘要

加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作组织成立了参与工作组(WG),以确保所有主要利益相关者都有机会就 CanREValue 真实世界证据(RWE)框架的制定和实施提供意见。2021 年举行了两次磋商,征求患者对临时政策和数据工作组报告中确定的关键政策和数据获取问题的看法。邀请了 30 多名代表患者、护理人员、倡导领袖以及参与患者研究的个人的人员参加磋商。磋商提供了重要的反馈和患者参与方面的宝贵经验。患者领袖积极塑造了磋商的过程和内容。由患者倡导领袖主持的分组讨论为所有参与者提供了开放和深思熟虑的贡献机会。提出了一些重要建议:RWE 框架不应阻碍新药的获取;应将其用于支持有条件批准;应在省级数据集中捕获与患者相关的终点;应改善进行 RWE 的数据获取;必须考虑隐私问题。本文档记录了 CanREValue 在协商过程中让患者参与的经验,以及当参与过程由患者自己指导时可以取得的有用贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/9406430/8d5ec8104a93/curroncol-29-00443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/9406430/d85342dc3ef8/curroncol-29-00443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/9406430/8d5ec8104a93/curroncol-29-00443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/9406430/d85342dc3ef8/curroncol-29-00443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f111/9406430/8d5ec8104a93/curroncol-29-00443-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned.参与加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据倡议(CanREValue):过程和经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 7;29(8):5616-5626. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080443.
2
Mapping Canadian Data Assets to Generate Real-World Evidence: Lessons Learned from Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration's RWE Data Working Group.将加拿大数据资产映射以生成真实世界证据:来自加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据 (CanREValue) 合作的真实世界证据数据工作组的经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;29(3):2046-2063. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030165.
3
Building a National Reassessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Lessons Learned by the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration through a Simulated Reassessment Exercise.建立肿瘤药物国家再评估流程:加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作组织通过模拟再评估练习所吸取的经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Nov 12;28(6):4645-4654. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060392.
4
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration.开发将真实世界证据纳入癌症药物资助决策框架:加拿大癌症药物价值的真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e032884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884.
5
Considerations for Developing a Reassessment Process: Report from the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration's Reassessment and Uptake Working Group.制定重新评估流程的考量因素:来自加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作组织重新评估与采用工作组的报告
Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 16;28(5):4174-4183. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050354.
6
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Prioritize Real-World Evidence Studies for Health Technology Management: Outcomes and Lessons Learned by the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration.多准则决策分析(MCDA)在优先考虑健康技术管理的真实世界证据研究中的应用:加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作的结果和经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 1;31(4):1876-1898. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040141.
7
Use of real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions in Canada: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.加拿大癌症药物资助决策中真实世界证据的应用:对利益相关者观点的定性研究
CMAJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;8(4):E772-E778. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200118. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
8
Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Rating Tool to Prioritize Real-World Evidence Questions for the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration.开发多标准决策分析评分工具,为加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作组织优先考虑真实世界证据问题。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 28;30(4):3776-3786. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040286.
9
Is Canada Moving towards a More Agile Regulatory Approval and Reimbursement Process with a Shifting Role for Real-World Evidence (RWE) for Oncology Drugs?加拿大是否正在朝着更灵活的监管审批和报销流程发展,为肿瘤药物的真实世界证据(RWE)赋予转变后的角色?
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 18;31(9):5599-5607. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090414.
10
Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter.患者和患者群体在癌症临床试验中的参与:利益相关者宪章。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Apr 8;28(2):1447-1458. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020137.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a framework on the incorporation of real-world evidence (RWE) into cancer drug funding decisions in Canada: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration.加拿大将真实世界证据(RWE)纳入癌症药物资金决策的框架制定:加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作项目
BMJ Open. 2025 May 30;15(5):e096286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096286.

本文引用的文献

1
Building a National Reassessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Lessons Learned by the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration through a Simulated Reassessment Exercise.建立肿瘤药物国家再评估流程:加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作组织通过模拟再评估练习所吸取的经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Nov 12;28(6):4645-4654. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060392.
2
Patient engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) and the regulatory process: what about rheumatology?患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)及监管过程:风湿病领域情况如何?
RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001286.
3
Real-world tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment pathways, monitoring patterns and responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in the United Kingdom: the UK TARGET CML study.
英国真实世界酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗方案、慢性髓性白血病患者监测模式和反应:英国 TARGET CML 研究。
Br J Haematol. 2021 Jan;192(1):62-74. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16733. Epub 2020 May 24.
4
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration.开发将真实世界证据纳入癌症药物资助决策框架:加拿大癌症药物价值的真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e032884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884.
5
What does meaningful look like? A qualitative study of patient engagement at the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: perspectives of reviewers and payers.有意义的样子是什么?一项对加拿大泛癌症药物审查中患者参与情况的定性研究:审查员和付款人的观点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):72-79. doi: 10.1177/1355819617750686. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
7
Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.公众参与卫生技术评估和覆盖决策:法国、德国和英国的经验研究。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Feb;38(1):89-122. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1898812. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
8
Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的公众和患者参与。
Patient. 2011;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/11586090-000000000-00000.