患者参与卫生技术评估（HTA）及监管过程：风湿病领域情况如何？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Patient engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) and the regulatory process: what about rheumatology?

作者信息

de Wit Maarten, Guillemin Francis, Grimm Sabine, Boonen Annelies, Fautrel Bruno, Joore Manuela

机构信息

Patient Research Partner, EULAR, Zaltbommel, Netherlands

School of Public Health, Nancy, France.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001286.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001286

PMID:33148783

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7856120/

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Patient engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) and the regulatory process: what about rheumatology?患者参与卫生技术评估（HTA）及监管过程：风湿病领域情况如何？

RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001286.

CHANGING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PARADIGMS?不断变化的卫生技术评估范式？

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):191-199. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000386. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

Ethical Challenges Related to Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment.与患者参与卫生技术评估相关的伦理挑战。

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):253-256. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000382. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment.重视患者参与：健康技术评估证据生成实践中的反思性学习。

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114048. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048. Epub 2021 May 21.

Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.社区对公众参与卫生技术评估决策的看法和观点。

Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):68-74. doi: 10.1071/AH15221.

WHY PATIENTS SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.为什么患者应该参与卫生技术评估。

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000241. Epub 2017 May 22.

Evaluation of patient involvement in a health technology assessment.患者参与卫生技术评估的评价

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):166-70. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000240. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.公众和患者参与卫生技术评估：行动框架

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):256-264. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000362. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes.明确公众在健康技术评估（HTA）和 HTA 决策过程中的角色。

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):87-95. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000094. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations.一项针对健康技术评估组织公众参与实践的国际调查。

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011.

引用本文的文献

Patient engagement for the development of equity-focused health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations: a case study of two Canadian HTA organizations.患者参与以制定关注公平性的卫生技术评估（HTA）建议：加拿大两个HTA组织的案例研究

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Mar 28;41(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000182.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of gene therapy for hemophilia type A and B.A型和 B 型血友病基因治疗的成本效益分析的系统评价。

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Oct;30(10):1178-1188. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1178.

Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study.芬兰患者组织参与药品评估和报销流程的经验 - 一项定性研究。

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jul 2;40(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000229.

Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究：系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。

Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.

Embedding the Patient-Citizen Perspective into an Operational Framework for the Development and the Introduction of New Technologies in Rehabilitation Care: The Smart&Touch-ID Model.将患者-公民视角融入康复护理新技术开发与引入的运营框架：智能&触摸识别模型。

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(11):1604. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111604.

Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned.参与加拿大癌症药物价值真实世界证据倡议（CanREValue）：过程和经验教训。

Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 7;29(8):5616-5626. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080443.

Steps in implementing a health economic evaluation.实施健康经济评估的步骤。

RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001288.

Health economic course in rheumatology: a EULAR SCHOOL initiative.风湿病学中的卫生经济学课程：欧洲抗风湿病联盟学校倡议。

RMD Open. 2020 Nov;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001238.

本文引用的文献

EULAR PARE: Knowledge Transfer Programme.欧洲抗风湿病联盟患者教育：知识传播项目。

Reumatologia. 2020;58(2):123-125. doi: 10.5114/reum.2020.95367. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Practical guidance for engaging patients in health research, treatment guidelines and regulatory processes: results of an expert group meeting organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).参与健康研究、治疗指南和监管流程的患者参与实用指南：世界卫生组织（WHO）和欧洲临床与经济骨质疏松、骨关节炎和肌肉骨骼疾病学会（ESCEO）组织的专家组会议的结果。

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jul;31(7):905-915. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01193-8. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Unique role of rheumatology in establishing collaborative relationships in research. Past, present and future of patient engagement.风湿病学在建立研究合作关系方面的独特作用。患者参与的过去、现在和未来。

Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):293-296. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214387. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment.欧洲患者参与药物研发指南：卫生技术评估

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 6;5:231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00231. eCollection 2018.

Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years' Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT).患者研究伙伴关系的成功逐步发展：风湿病学疗效指标（OMERACT）14年的行动与结果经验

Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):141-152. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4.

Patient participation as an integral part of patient-reported outcomes development ensures the representation of the patient voice: a case study from the field of rheumatology.患者参与作为患者报告结局开发的一个组成部分，确保了患者声音的代表性：来自风湿病学领域的案例研究。

RMD Open. 2015 Aug 5;1(1):e000129. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000129. eCollection 2015.

Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP.患者研究合作伙伴（PRP）参与OMERACT工作组的建议。OMERACT 2014年PRP工作组报告。

J Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;43(1):187-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141011. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Dialogical ethics and responsive evaluation as a framework for patient participation.作为患者参与框架的对话伦理学与回应性评价

Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):27-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900143.

How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。

Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--2.概念化模型：ISPOR-SMDM 建模良好研究实践工作组的报告--2.

Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验