• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的成功率:一项系统评价

Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Solà Pérez Aleix, Pastorino David, Aparicio Carlos, Pegueroles Neyra Marta, Khan Rabia Sannam, Wright Simon, Ucer Cemal

机构信息

Zygoma ZAGA Centers, Carrer Castellá 33, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.

Clínica Hepler Bone, Román Macaya 22, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151.

DOI:10.3390/dj10080151
PMID:36005249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406716/
Abstract

Zygomatic implants are a treatment solution for patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This treatment option allows delivering immediate fixed teeth within 24 h. Numerous peer-reviewed publications have reported different success rates, resulting in a disagreement on the topic. Therefore, the overall efficacy and predictability of this rehabilitation is still a matter of discussion. With this study, we aimed to identify the published literature on the use of zygomatic implants for the reconstruction of the severely atrophic maxilla and report the cumulative success rate (CSR) as a function of follow-up time. A systematic review of the literature on zygomatic implant for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was performed and 196 publications were included in the study. The cumulative success rate of zygomatic implants for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was 98.5% at less than 1 year, 97.5% between 1 and 3 years, 96.8% between 3 and 5 years and 96.1% after more than 5 years. The most commonly reported complications were soft tissue dehiscence, rhinosinusitis and prosthetic failures. The treatment of severe lack of bone in the upper maxilla with zygomatic implants is a safe procedure, reaching a cumulative success rate of 96.1% after more than 5 years.

摘要

颧骨种植体是治疗严重上颌骨萎缩患者的一种治疗方案。这种治疗选择能够在24小时内实现即刻固定义齿修复。众多经过同行评审的出版物报道了不同的成功率,导致在这个话题上存在分歧。因此,这种修复方式的总体疗效和可预测性仍是一个讨论的问题。通过本研究,我们旨在确定已发表的关于使用颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的文献,并报告作为随访时间函数的累积成功率(CSR)。对关于颧骨种植体治疗严重上颌骨萎缩的文献进行了系统回顾,196篇出版物纳入了本研究。颧骨种植体治疗严重上颌骨萎缩的累积成功率在1年以内为98.5%,1至3年为97.5%,3至5年为96.8%,5年以上为96.1%。最常报道的并发症是软组织裂开、鼻窦炎和修复体失败。使用颧骨种植体治疗上颌骨严重骨量不足是一种安全的手术,5年以上的累积成功率为96.1%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/1e311257cbb9/dentistry-10-00151-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/9c2331ee4804/dentistry-10-00151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/0ba7d59628cd/dentistry-10-00151-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/e899aadcbfc8/dentistry-10-00151-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/20929bb76d4f/dentistry-10-00151-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/7808f69f06c8/dentistry-10-00151-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/1e311257cbb9/dentistry-10-00151-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/9c2331ee4804/dentistry-10-00151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/0ba7d59628cd/dentistry-10-00151-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/e899aadcbfc8/dentistry-10-00151-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/20929bb76d4f/dentistry-10-00151-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/7808f69f06c8/dentistry-10-00151-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/9406716/1e311257cbb9/dentistry-10-00151-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的成功率:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151.
2
Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results From a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.颧骨窦外种植体即刻修复萎缩上颌骨:多中心前瞻性队列研究的 1 年加载后结果。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.一项关于颧弓钛种植体用于萎缩性无牙上颌骨修复的前瞻性临床研究,随访时间为6个月至5年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.
4
Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years.颧骨种植体支持的严重萎缩上颌骨即刻全牙弓修复:一项随访至少6年的前瞻性临床研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;46(12):1592-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
5
Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants: review.颧骨种植体修复萎缩性上颌骨后部:综述
J Oral Implantol. 2012 Oct;38(5):653-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00126. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
Clinical outcomes and biological and mechanical complications of immediate fixed prostheses supported by zygomatic implants: A retrospective analysis from a prospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.颧骨种植体即刻修复固定义齿的临床效果及生物学和机械并发症:一项前瞻性临床研究的回顾性分析,随访时间长达 11 年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Aug;23(4):612-624. doi: 10.1111/cid.13017. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Zygomatic implants supported rehabilitations in atrophic maxilla: sinus complications, radiological, periodontal and prosthodontic evaluations: a one year follow up retrospective longitudinal study.颧骨种植体支持萎缩上颌骨的修复:窦并发症、影像学、牙周和修复学评估:为期一年的回顾性纵向研究。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6 Suppl. 2):89-100.
8
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.一项关于采用上颌外植入即刻负重颧骨种植体修复完全无牙萎缩性上颌骨的回顾性队列研究的五年随访结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81.
9
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):145-161.
10
Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants.萎缩性上颌骨的修复:101例颧骨种植体的回顾
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Jun 1;13(6):E363-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Autogenous Trephine Core Sinus Lift and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Case Report.自体环钻式骨块上颌窦提升同期种植术:病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):e87267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87267. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Graftless Solutions for Rehabilitation of Atrophied Maxilla - Zygomatic Versus Subperiosteal Implants - A Systematic Review.萎缩性上颌骨修复的无移植解决方案——颧骨种植体与骨膜下种植体对比——一项系统评价
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S207-S210. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1802_24. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
3
Bone Resorption Assessment Following Zygomatic Implants Surgery over 10 Years of Follow-Up.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress Distribution Pattern in Zygomatic Implants Supporting Different Superstructure Materials.颧骨种植体支持不同上部结构材料时的应力分布模式
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 16;15(14):4953. doi: 10.3390/ma15144953.
2
Preoperative Evaluation and Treatment Planning. Zygomatic Implant Critical Zone (ZICZ) Location.术前评估与治疗规划。颧骨种植关键区域(ZICZ)定位。
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;29(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
Survival Rate and Prosthetic and Sinus Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants for the Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
颧骨种植体手术后超过10年随访期的骨吸收评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):989. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030989.
4
Assessment of different treatment alternatives for patients with total maxillectomy.全上颌骨切除患者不同治疗方案的评估
J Prosthodont. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13947.
5
Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Zygomatic Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillary Arches - A Prospective Study.颧种植体支持的萎缩性上颌牙弓修复手术效果评估——一项前瞻性研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_32_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Sinus Complication and Survival Rates of Quad Zygoma versus Bizygoma in Combination with two Regular Implants in Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.萎缩性上颌骨中 Quad Zygoma 与 Bizygoma 联合两颗常规种植体的鼻窦并发症及生存率的比较评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Jun;23(3):710-718. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02136-1. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
7
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 3‑year follow‑up non‑interventional study.圆形和平面颧骨种植体:3 年随访非干预研究的效果。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 10;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00548-9.
8
Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with maxillary oncology defects using zygomatic implants.采用颧骨种植体对上颌骨肿瘤缺损患者进行修复。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 10;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00545-y.
9
Quad Zygoma: A Graftless Solution in Post-mucormycosis Maxillectomy.四边形颧骨:毛霉菌病后上颌骨切除术中的无移植解决方案。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e50014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50014. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Finite Element Analysis of Subperiosteal Implants in Edentulism-On the Basis of the MaI Implant by Integra Implants.无牙颌骨膜下种植体的有限元分析——基于Integra种植体的Mai种植体
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;16(23):7466. doi: 10.3390/ma16237466.
颧种植体修复上颌骨萎缩性无牙颌的生存率、修复体及窦并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;10(7):601. doi: 10.3390/biology10070601.
4
Survival Rate of Zygomatic Implants for Fixed Oral Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes between Zygomatic and Regular Implants.用于口腔上颌骨固定修复的颧骨种植体存活率:一项比较颧骨种植体与常规种植体效果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):38. doi: 10.3390/dj9040038.
5
Combined bone- and mucosa-supported 3D-printed guide for sinus slot preparation and prosthetically driven zygomatic implant placement.用于窦槽预备和修复驱动的颧骨种植体放置的骨-黏膜联合支撑的 3D 打印导板。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1165-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review.上颌骨萎缩患者采用颧骨种植体进行全颌修复:系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 26;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00297-z.
7
Quad Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Survival and Complications.四象限颧骨种植体:一项关于存活率和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):21-29. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8417.
8
Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis.颧种植体植入萎缩性上颌骨:当前系统评价和荟萃分析概述
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 6;43(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00286-z.
9
Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results From a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.颧骨窦外种植体即刻修复萎缩上颌骨:多中心前瞻性队列研究的 1 年加载后结果。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Retrospective Analysis of Zygomatic Implants for Maxillary Prosthetic Rehabilitation.回顾性分析颧骨种植体在上颌义齿修复中的应用。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):750-756. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8196.