文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

颧种植体支持的萎缩性上颌牙弓修复手术效果评估——一项前瞻性研究

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Zygomatic Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillary Arches - A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Venkatachalam Vaishali, Pandiarajan Rajesh, Meyappan Alagappan, Anbukkarasu Harushi

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, A.S Dentistry, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_32_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.


DOI:10.4103/ams.ams_32_23
PMID:39184428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340836/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic rehabilitation with implants in the atrophic edentulous maxilla often requires a bone augmentation procedure to enable implant placement and integration. However, rigid anchorage can also be achieved using long zygomatic implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxillary ridges with zygomatic implants using the zygomatic success code (ZSC) and derive the success grade for the procedure based on the observed results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of eight implants were placed in an extrasinus technique based on the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach. The following were evaluated postoperatively - primary stability, maxillary sinus pathology, soft-tissue healing and prosthetic offset. The ZSC score was calculated, and success grading was given with ZSC based on Aparacio .,'s guidelines. RESULTS: One implant had Grade 1 mobility and partial maxillary sinus opacification, 25% ( = 2) revealed a mild recession exposing the implant head and 12.5% ( = 1) showed significant recession up to 7 mm. The prosthetic offset of zygomatic implants was scored -1 for all eight implants. Five implants were given a success code of 1/1/1/1 and a success grade of Grade I, two implants were given code 1/1/2/1 with Grade II and one implant 2/2/3/1 and grade III. The results imply that zygomatic implants can be a successful option in maxillary rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: The zygomatic implants, as a graft less and promising solution to the rehabilitation of atrophied maxillary arches, have excellent surgical outcomes with varied advantages.

摘要

引言:在上颌骨萎缩的无牙颌患者中,使用种植体进行修复重建通常需要进行骨增量手术,以实现种植体的植入和整合。然而,使用长的颧骨种植体也可以实现牢固的固位。本研究的目的是使用颧骨成功代码(ZSC)评估颧骨种植体修复萎缩性上颌后牙嵴的手术效果,并根据观察结果得出该手术的成功等级。 材料与方法:基于颧骨解剖引导方法,采用窦外技术共植入8枚种植体。术后评估以下指标——初期稳定性、上颌窦病变、软组织愈合情况和修复体偏移。计算ZSC评分,并根据阿帕拉西奥等人的指南,用ZSC进行成功分级。 结果:1枚种植体有1级松动和部分上颌窦混浊,25%(=2)显示轻度退缩,暴露种植体头部,12.5%(=1)显示严重退缩达7mm。8枚颧骨种植体的修复体偏移评分为-1。5枚种植体的成功代码为1/1/1/1,成功等级为I级,2枚种植体代码为1/1/2/1,等级为II级,1枚种植体为2/2/3/1,等级为III级。结果表明,颧骨种植体可以是上颌骨修复的一个成功选择。 讨论:颧骨种植体作为一种无需植骨且有前景的上颌骨萎缩修复解决方案,具有出色的手术效果和多种优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/f5f3ab1f0640/AMS-14-27-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/0701d8028a5a/AMS-14-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/27d15c48beb2/AMS-14-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/f9ff913fdd71/AMS-14-27-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/0c17cec5f2ba/AMS-14-27-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/99ec827f4fba/AMS-14-27-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/f5f3ab1f0640/AMS-14-27-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/0701d8028a5a/AMS-14-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/27d15c48beb2/AMS-14-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/f9ff913fdd71/AMS-14-27-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/0c17cec5f2ba/AMS-14-27-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/99ec827f4fba/AMS-14-27-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb6/11340836/f5f3ab1f0640/AMS-14-27-g006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Zygomatic Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillary Arches - A Prospective Study.

Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024

[2]
A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006

[3]
Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results From a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021-2

[4]
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020

[5]
Restoration of the edentulous maxilla using extrasinus zygomatic implants combined with anterior conventional implants: a retrospective study.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011

[6]
Three-year clinical prospective follow-up of extrasinus zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017-7-13

[7]
Effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation for the atrophic edentulous maxilla: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Syst Rev. 2024-5-31

[8]
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018

[9]
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018

[10]
Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code.

Periodontol 2000. 2014-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
15-Year Retrospective Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation and Implants: Influence of Bone Substitute Type, Presurgical Bone Height, and Membrane Perforation during Sinus Lift.

Biomed Res Int. 2023

[2]
Clinical application of platelet-rich fibrin to enhance dental implant stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heliyon. 2023-1-26

[3]
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.

Dent J (Basel). 2022-8-12

[4]
Stress Distribution Pattern in Zygomatic Implants Supporting Different Superstructure Materials.

Materials (Basel). 2022-7-16

[5]
PRP and PRF-Subgroups and Divisions When Used in Dentistry.

J Pers Med. 2021-9-23

[6]
Preoperative Evaluation and Treatment Planning. Zygomatic Implant Critical Zone (ZICZ) Location.

Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2021-9

[7]
Survival Rate of Zygomatic Implants for Fixed Oral Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes between Zygomatic and Regular Implants.

Dent J (Basel). 2021-4-1

[8]
Combined bone- and mucosa-supported 3D-printed guide for sinus slot preparation and prosthetically driven zygomatic implant placement.

J Prosthet Dent. 2022-12

[9]
Quad Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Survival and Complications.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021

[10]
Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021-1-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索