Venkatachalam Vaishali, Pandiarajan Rajesh, Meyappan Alagappan, Anbukkarasu Harushi
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, A.S Dentistry, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_32_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic rehabilitation with implants in the atrophic edentulous maxilla often requires a bone augmentation procedure to enable implant placement and integration. However, rigid anchorage can also be achieved using long zygomatic implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxillary ridges with zygomatic implants using the zygomatic success code (ZSC) and derive the success grade for the procedure based on the observed results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of eight implants were placed in an extrasinus technique based on the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach. The following were evaluated postoperatively - primary stability, maxillary sinus pathology, soft-tissue healing and prosthetic offset. The ZSC score was calculated, and success grading was given with ZSC based on Aparacio .,'s guidelines. RESULTS: One implant had Grade 1 mobility and partial maxillary sinus opacification, 25% ( = 2) revealed a mild recession exposing the implant head and 12.5% ( = 1) showed significant recession up to 7 mm. The prosthetic offset of zygomatic implants was scored -1 for all eight implants. Five implants were given a success code of 1/1/1/1 and a success grade of Grade I, two implants were given code 1/1/2/1 with Grade II and one implant 2/2/3/1 and grade III. The results imply that zygomatic implants can be a successful option in maxillary rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: The zygomatic implants, as a graft less and promising solution to the rehabilitation of atrophied maxillary arches, have excellent surgical outcomes with varied advantages.
引言:在上颌骨萎缩的无牙颌患者中,使用种植体进行修复重建通常需要进行骨增量手术,以实现种植体的植入和整合。然而,使用长的颧骨种植体也可以实现牢固的固位。本研究的目的是使用颧骨成功代码(ZSC)评估颧骨种植体修复萎缩性上颌后牙嵴的手术效果,并根据观察结果得出该手术的成功等级。 材料与方法:基于颧骨解剖引导方法,采用窦外技术共植入8枚种植体。术后评估以下指标——初期稳定性、上颌窦病变、软组织愈合情况和修复体偏移。计算ZSC评分,并根据阿帕拉西奥等人的指南,用ZSC进行成功分级。 结果:1枚种植体有1级松动和部分上颌窦混浊,25%(=2)显示轻度退缩,暴露种植体头部,12.5%(=1)显示严重退缩达7mm。8枚颧骨种植体的修复体偏移评分为-1。5枚种植体的成功代码为1/1/1/1,成功等级为I级,2枚种植体代码为1/1/2/1,等级为II级,1枚种植体为2/2/3/1,等级为III级。结果表明,颧骨种植体可以是上颌骨修复的一个成功选择。 讨论:颧骨种植体作为一种无需植骨且有前景的上颌骨萎缩修复解决方案,具有出色的手术效果和多种优势。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017-7-13
Periodontol 2000. 2014-10
Materials (Basel). 2022-7-16
J Pers Med. 2021-9-23
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2021-9
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021-1-6