• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圆形和平面颧骨种植体:3 年随访非干预研究的效果。

Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 3‑year follow‑up non‑interventional study.

机构信息

Zygomatic Unit, Hepler Bone Clinic, ZAGA Center Barcelona, Roman Macaya, 22-24, 08022, Barcelona, Spain.

International Teaching Scholar, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 10;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00548-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-024-00548-9
PMID:38856876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11164844/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This non-interventional study investigates variations in the type and frequency of late complications linked to novel zygomatic implant designs, installed adhering to the Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach (ZAGA) concept, over an extended follow-up period of at least 3 years.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting indications for treatment with ZIs were treated according to ZAGA recommendations. Implants were immediately loaded. The ORIS success criteria for prosthetic offset, stability, sinus changes and soft-tissue status were used to evaluate the outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated. Ten patients received two ZIs and regular implants; one received three ZIs plus regular implants, and nine received four ZIs. Fifty-nine ZIs were placed: thirty-six (61%) Straumann ZAGA-Flat implants and twenty-three (39%) Straumann ZAGA-Round implants. Four patients (20%) presented earlier sinus floor discontinuities. Fifteen patients (75%) had prior sinus opacities. Nineteen patients were followed for between 38 and 53 months (mean 46.5 months). One patient dropped out after 20 months. When comparing pre-surgical CBCT with post-surgical CBCT, 84.7% of the sites presented identical or less sinus opacity; nine locations (15%) showed decreased, and another nine increased (15%) post-surgical sinus opacity. Fifty-three ZIs (89.8%) maintained stable soft tissue. Six ZIs had recessions with no signs of infection. ZIs and prosthesis survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the effectiveness of ZAGA-based zygomatic implant rehabilitations using Round and Flat designs. Despite patient number constraints, minimal changes in the frequency of late complications from the 1-year follow-up were observed. 100% implant and prosthesis survival rate over a mean follow-up of 46.5 months is reported.

摘要

目的

本非介入性研究调查了在至少 3 年的延长随访期内,采用 Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach(ZAGA)概念安装新型颧骨种植体设计的种植体,其与晚期并发症的类型和频率的变化。

方法

根据 ZAGA 建议,对有 ZI 治疗适应证的连续患者进行治疗。种植体立即加载。使用 ORIS 修复体偏移、稳定性、窦变化和软组织状况的成功标准来评估结果。

结果

共治疗 20 例患者。10 例患者接受了 2 个 ZI 和常规种植体治疗;1 例患者接受了 3 个 ZI 和常规种植体治疗,9 例患者接受了 4 个 ZI 治疗。共植入 59 个 ZI:36 个(61%)Straumann ZAGA-Flat 种植体和 23 个(39%)Straumann ZAGA-Round 种植体。4 例患者(20%)出现早期窦底不连续。15 例患者(75%)有既往窦腔混浊。19 例患者的随访时间为 38 至 53 个月(平均 46.5 个月)。1 例患者在 20 个月后脱落。将术前 CBCT 与术后 CBCT 进行比较,84.7%的部位呈现出相同或更少的窦腔混浊;9 个部位(15%)显示术后窦腔混浊减少,另外 9 个部位(15%)增加。53 个 ZI(89.8%)保持稳定的软组织。6 个 ZI 出现了无感染迹象的退缩。ZI 和修复体的存活率为 100%。

结论

该研究强调了基于 ZAGA 的颧骨种植体修复使用圆形和平面设计的有效性。尽管受到患者数量的限制,但从 1 年随访观察到晚期并发症的频率几乎没有变化。在平均 46.5 个月的随访中,报告了 100%的种植体和修复体存活率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/09c36eef5f1e/40729_2024_548_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8e1846f64032/40729_2024_548_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/50332bb4071f/40729_2024_548_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/54eeb2d12131/40729_2024_548_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/d750e395fca2/40729_2024_548_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8f7b5df71e7e/40729_2024_548_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/483030e385f2/40729_2024_548_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/f488c74101c3/40729_2024_548_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8f2078c4e394/40729_2024_548_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/76a14a0a6b38/40729_2024_548_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/016383caf422/40729_2024_548_Fig10a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/c1b067ae8d8a/40729_2024_548_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/0b78daf4533c/40729_2024_548_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/09c36eef5f1e/40729_2024_548_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8e1846f64032/40729_2024_548_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/50332bb4071f/40729_2024_548_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/54eeb2d12131/40729_2024_548_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/d750e395fca2/40729_2024_548_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8f7b5df71e7e/40729_2024_548_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/483030e385f2/40729_2024_548_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/f488c74101c3/40729_2024_548_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/8f2078c4e394/40729_2024_548_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/76a14a0a6b38/40729_2024_548_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/016383caf422/40729_2024_548_Fig10a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/c1b067ae8d8a/40729_2024_548_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/0b78daf4533c/40729_2024_548_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7586/11164844/09c36eef5f1e/40729_2024_548_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 3‑year follow‑up non‑interventional study.圆形和平面颧骨种植体:3 年随访非干预研究的效果。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 10;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00548-9.
2
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.圆形和平坦型颧骨植入物:一项为期1年的非干预性研究随访后的有效性
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Apr 1;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00412-8.
3
Zygomatic implants placed using the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach versus the classical technique: a proposed system to report rhinosinusitis diagnosis.采用颧骨解剖引导法与传统技术植入颧骨种植体:一种报告鼻窦炎诊断的建议系统。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Oct;16(5):627-42. doi: 10.1111/cid.12047. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
4
A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patient based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey.基于颧骨解剖引导入路(ZAGA)的颧骨种植患者拟议分类:一项横断面调查
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Autumn;4(3):269-75.
5
Long-term survival and complications of Quad Zygoma Protocol with Anatomy-Guided Approach in severely atrophic maxilla: A retrospective follow-up analysis of up to 17 years.采用解剖导向的 Quad Zygoma 方案治疗严重萎缩上颌骨的长期生存和并发症:长达 17 年的回顾性随访分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Apr;26(2):343-355. doi: 10.1111/cid.13296. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Identification of the Pathway and Appropriate Use of Four Zygomatic Implants in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional Study.在萎缩性上颌骨中识别四种颧骨种植体的途径和合理应用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):807-817. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8603.
7
A single-arm clinical trial investigating the feasibility of the zygomatic implant quad approach for Cawood and Howell Class 4 edentulous maxilla: An option for immediate loading.一项单臂临床试验,研究颧骨种植体 quad 入路治疗考沃德和豪厄尔 4 类无牙颌上颌骨的可行性:即刻负重的一种选择。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):800-808. doi: 10.1111/cid.13046. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
8
Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach "Scarf Graft" for Prevention of Soft Tissue Dehiscence Around Zygomatic Implants: Technical Note.颧骨解剖引导式“Scarf 移植物”预防颧骨种植体周围软组织裂开:技术说明。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):e21-e26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8065.
9
Zygomatic implants placed with a two-stage procedure: a 5-year retrospective study.采用两阶段手术植入颧骨种植体:一项5年回顾性研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Summer;2(2):115-24.
10
The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria-A 10-Year Follow-Up.颧骨解剖引导入路、颧骨眶底分类及ORIS标准——10年随访
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6681. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206681.

引用本文的文献

1
Workflow for Maxilla/Mandible Individual [Mai] Implant by Integra Implants-How Individual Implants Are Manufactured.Integra种植体的上颌/下颌个性化[Mai]种植流程——个性化种植体的制造方式。
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):1773. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081773.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival and complications of zygomatic implants compared to conventional implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在至少随访 5 年的纵向研究中,与常规种植体相比,颧骨种植体的存活率和并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):177-189. doi: 10.1111/cid.13153. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的成功率:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151.
3
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.
圆形和平坦型颧骨植入物:一项为期1年的非干预性研究随访后的有效性
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Apr 1;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00412-8.
4
Peri-zygomatic infection associated with zygomatic implants: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.伴颧骨种植体的眶周感染:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):405-412. doi: 10.1111/clr.13900. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe maxillary bone atrophy restored with zygomatic implant-supported complete dental prostheses: a systematic review.采用颧骨种植体支持的全牙列修复严重上颌骨萎缩患者的患者报告结局:系统评价。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Jul;80(5):363-373. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.2018494. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Identification of the Pathway and Appropriate Use of Four Zygomatic Implants in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional Study.在萎缩性上颌骨中识别四种颧骨种植体的途径和合理应用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):807-817. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8603.
7
The Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach for Placement of Zygomatic Implants.用于颧骨种植体植入的颧骨解剖引导入路
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;29(2):203-231. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.颧骨相关修复的 ORIS 成功标准:(再探讨)颧骨成功编码。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488.
9
Surgical complications in zygomatic implants: A systematic review.颧骨种植体的手术并发症:一项系统评价。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Nov 1;21(6):e751-e757. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21357.
10
Survival and Complications of Zygomatic Implants: An Updated Systematic Review.颧骨种植体的生存率与并发症:一项更新的系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;74(10):1949-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.166. Epub 2016 Jun 18.