Division of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South Universitygrid.216417.7, Changsha, China.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Sep 20;66(9):e0082222. doi: 10.1128/aac.00822-22. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
The optimal dosing regimen for meropenem in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains undefined due to small studied sample sizes and uninformative pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses in reported studies. The present study aimed to perform a population PK/PD meta-analysis of meropenem using available literature data to suggest the optimal treatment regimen. A total of 501 meropenem concentration measurements from 78 adult CRRT patients pooled from nine published studies were used to develop the population PK model for meropenem. PK/PD target (40% and 100% of the time with the unbound drug plasma concentration above the MIC) marker-based efficacy and risk of toxicity (trough concentrations of >45 mg/L) for short-term (30 min), prolonged (3 h), and continuous (24 h) infusion dosing strategies for meropenem were investigated. The impact of CRRT dose and identified covariates on the PD probability of target attainment (PTA) and predicted toxicity was also examined. Meropenem concentration data were adequately described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Trauma was identified as a pronounced modifier for endogenous clearance of meropenem. Simulations demonstrated that adequate PK/PD targets and low risk of toxicity could be achieved in non-trauma CRRT patients receiving meropenem regimens of 1 g every 6 h infused over 30 min, 1 g every 8 h infused over 3 h, and 2 to 4 g every 24 h infused over 24 h. The impact of CRRT dose (25 to 50 mL/kg/h) on PTA was clinically irrelevant, and continuous infusion of 3 to 4 g every 24 h was suitable for trauma CRRT patients (MICs of ≤0.5 mg/L). A population PK model was developed for meropenem in CRRT patients, and different dosing regimens were proposed for non-trauma and trauma CRRT patients.
由于研究样本量小以及报告研究中无信息的药代动力学(PK)/药效学(PD)分析,对于接受连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的危重症患者,美罗培南的最佳给药方案仍未确定。本研究旨在使用现有文献数据对美罗培南进行群体 PK/PD 荟萃分析,以提出最佳治疗方案。从 9 项已发表的研究中汇集了 78 名接受 CRRT 的成年患者的 501 次美罗培南浓度测量值,用于开发美罗培南的群体 PK 模型。针对美罗培南的短期(30 分钟)、延长(3 小时)和连续(24 小时)输注给药策略,研究了基于 PK/PD 目标(游离药物血浆浓度超过 MIC 的时间占 40%和 100%)的疗效和毒性风险(谷浓度>45mg/L)标志物。还检查了 CRRT 剂量和鉴定的协变量对目标达标概率(PTA)和预测毒性的影响。美罗培南浓度数据通过具有线性消除的两室模型得到了充分描述。创伤被确定为美罗培南内源性清除率的明显修饰剂。模拟结果表明,非创伤性 CRRT 患者接受每 6 小时输注 30 分钟的 1 g 美罗培南、每 8 小时输注 3 小时的 1 g 美罗培南以及每 24 小时输注 2 至 4 g 的方案,可以达到足够的 PK/PD 目标和低毒性风险。CRRT 剂量(25 至 50mL/kg/h)对 PTA 的影响临床无关,每 24 小时连续输注 3 至 4 g 适用于创伤性 CRRT 患者(MICs≤0.5mg/L)。为 CRRT 患者开发了美罗培南的群体 PK 模型,并为非创伤性和创伤性 CRRT 患者提出了不同的给药方案。