Nagamine M, Kishimoto T, Aono J, Kato H, Kominami R, Muramatsu M
Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;7(4):1486-95. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.4.1486-1495.1987.
We compared the ability of various deletion and substitution mutants of the mouse rRNA gene promoter to bind essential factors required for accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Different amounts of a competitor template were first incubated with a mouse cell extract containing the whole complement of factors and RNA polymerase I, and then a tester template was added for the second incubation. Transcription was started by adding nucleoside triphosphates (one labeled), and the accurate transcripts were determined on a gel. The results indicated that the ability of 5' deletion mutants to sequester essential factors decreased almost concurrently with the impairment of in vitro transcription activity, whereas when the promoter sequence was removed from the 3' side, the transcription activity decreased earlier and more drastically than the sequestration ability. Similar, though not identical, results were obtained by preincubation with fraction D separated on a phosphocellulose column, indicating that the major factor which was sequestered was TFID, the species-dependent transcription initiation factor that binds first to the promoter in the initiation reaction (H. Kato, M. Nagamine, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3418-3427, 1986). Compilation of the data suggests that a region inside the 5' half of the core promoter (-40 to -1) is essential for the binding of TFID. The 3' half of the promoter (-1 to downstream) is not essential for the binding of TFID but is highly important for an efficient transcription initiation. A strong down-mutant with a one-base substitution at -16 (G to A) had a reduced ability to bind to TFID, whereas a null mutant with a single base substitution at -7 (G to A) showed a binding ability similar to that of the wild-type promoter when tested with whole-cell extract. This null mutant, however, could not sequester the TFID well when incubated with fraction D alone, suggesting that the binding of TFID with this mutant is unstable in the absence of another factor(s) present in cell extract. The factor is not TFIA, which binds after TFID, because the addition of fraction A containing TFIA did not cause TFID to bind to the mutant. The availability of different mutants having lesions at different steps of transcription initiation will provide a powerful tool for the dissection of the initiation reaction of the RNA gene.
我们比较了小鼠rRNA基因启动子的各种缺失和取代突变体结合RNA聚合酶I准确转录起始所需关键因子的能力。首先将不同量的竞争模板与含有完整因子和RNA聚合酶I的小鼠细胞提取物一起孵育,然后加入测试模板进行第二次孵育。通过添加核苷三磷酸(一种带标记的)启动转录,并在凝胶上测定准确的转录本。结果表明,5'缺失突变体隔离关键因子的能力几乎与体外转录活性的受损同时下降,而当从3'端去除启动子序列时,转录活性比隔离能力更早且更剧烈地下降。用在磷酸纤维素柱上分离的D组分进行预孵育得到了相似但不完全相同的结果,表明被隔离的主要因子是TFID,即物种依赖性转录起始因子,它在起始反应中首先与启动子结合(H. 加藤、M. 永见、R. 小南和M. 村松,《分子细胞生物学》6:3418 - 3427, 1986)。数据汇总表明,核心启动子5'半区(-40至-1)内的一个区域对于TFID的结合至关重要。启动子的3'半区(-1至下游)对于TFID的结合不是必需的,但对于高效转录起始非常重要。在-16处有一个单碱基取代(G到A)的强下调突变体与TFID结合的能力降低,而在-7处有一个单碱基取代(G到A)的无效突变体在用全细胞提取物测试时显示出与野生型启动子相似的结合能力。然而,当单独与D组分孵育时,这个无效突变体不能很好地隔离TFID,这表明在细胞提取物中不存在其他因子的情况下,TFID与该突变体的结合不稳定。该因子不是TFIA,因为TFIA在TFID之后结合,添加含有TFIA的A组分不会使TFID与突变体结合。在转录起始的不同步骤有损伤的不同突变体的可用性将为剖析RNA基因的起始反应提供一个强大的工具。