• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自杀与他杀:康德伦理学中的对称与非对称。

Suicide and Homicide: Symmetries and Asymmetries in Kant's Ethics.

机构信息

, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):715-728. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10105-z. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-022-10105-z
PMID:36006595
Abstract

Kant formulated a secular argument against suicide's permissibility based on what he regarded as the intrinsic value of humanity. In this paper, I first show that Kant's moral framework entails that some types of suicide are morally permissible. Just as some homicides are morally permissible, according to Kant, so are suicides that are performed according to equivalent maxims. Intention, foreseeability, voluntariness, diminished responsibility, and mental capacity determine the moral characterization of the killing. I argue that a suicide taxonomy that differentiates types of suicide according to morally relevant criteria is compatible with Kantian ethics; it establishes that even where we hold a robust deontological sanctity of life position, we are not obligated to preserve the lives of people whose future life only offers profound suffering, and helping them to die may be justifiable if doing so honors their dignity and autonomy. Nevertheless, homicide and suicide are only weakly morally symmetrical in that even if a given suicide is morally impermissible, we do not normally have the right to prevent it forcibly, though this may be altered by juridical laws under some circumstances.

摘要

康德基于他所认为的人类内在价值,对自杀的允许性提出了一种非宗教的论证。在本文中,我首先表明,康德的道德框架意味着某些类型的自杀在道德上是允许的。就像根据康德的观点,某些杀人在道德上是允许的一样,根据等价准则实施的自杀也是允许的。意图、可预见性、自愿性、责任减轻和心理能力决定了杀人的道德特征。我认为,根据与道德相关的标准对自杀进行分类的自杀分类法与康德伦理学是一致的;它表明,即使我们持有生命的强大道义神圣性立场,我们也没有义务保护那些未来生活只带来深刻痛苦的人的生命,而且如果这样做尊重他们的尊严和自主权,帮助他们死亡可能是合理的。然而,杀人行为和自杀行为在道德上只是弱对称的,即使某种特定的自杀在道德上是不允许的,我们通常也没有权利强行阻止它,尽管在某些情况下,法律可能会对此进行修改。

相似文献

1
Suicide and Homicide: Symmetries and Asymmetries in Kant's Ethics.自杀与他杀:康德伦理学中的对称与非对称。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):715-728. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10105-z. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
"A Kantian care ethics suicide duty".“康德式关怀伦理自杀义务”。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Sep-Dec;36(5-6):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
In defence of Kant's moral prohibition on suicide solely to avoid suffering.为康德仅为避免痛苦而自杀的道德禁令辩护。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):655-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021410.
4
Kant's 'formula of humanity' and assisted reproductive technology: a case for duties to future children.康德的“人性公式”与辅助生殖技术:论对未来儿童的责任
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2017 Nov;34(3-4):206-225. doi: 10.1007/s40592-017-0072-8.
5
Forgiveness and Moral Development.宽恕与道德发展。
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2016;44(4):1029-1055. doi: 10.1007/s11406-016-9727-6. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Empirical psychology, common sense, and Kant's empirical markers for moral responsibility.经验心理学、常识与康德关于道德责任的经验性标志
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2008 Dec;39(4):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.09.011.
7
Kantian Ethics and the Animal Turn. On the Contemporary Defence of Kant's Indirect Duty View.康德伦理学与动物转向。论康德间接义务观的当代辩护。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;11(2):512. doi: 10.3390/ani11020512.
8
Persons with pre-dementia have no Kantian duty to die.有认知障碍前的人没有康德式的死亡义务。
Bioethics. 2021 Jun;35(5):438-445. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12865. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not.杀人:康德对于自杀和安乐死可能会说的话,但他并未提及。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Oct;32(10):571-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015420.
10
Taking human life.夺取人命。
Ethics. 1985 Jul;95(4):851-65. doi: 10.1086/292688.

引用本文的文献

1
How do roles impact suicidal agents' obligations?角色如何影响自杀代理人的义务?
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Mar;27(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10177-5. Epub 2023 Oct 18.