, Glasgow, Scotland.
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):715-728. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10105-z. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Kant formulated a secular argument against suicide's permissibility based on what he regarded as the intrinsic value of humanity. In this paper, I first show that Kant's moral framework entails that some types of suicide are morally permissible. Just as some homicides are morally permissible, according to Kant, so are suicides that are performed according to equivalent maxims. Intention, foreseeability, voluntariness, diminished responsibility, and mental capacity determine the moral characterization of the killing. I argue that a suicide taxonomy that differentiates types of suicide according to morally relevant criteria is compatible with Kantian ethics; it establishes that even where we hold a robust deontological sanctity of life position, we are not obligated to preserve the lives of people whose future life only offers profound suffering, and helping them to die may be justifiable if doing so honors their dignity and autonomy. Nevertheless, homicide and suicide are only weakly morally symmetrical in that even if a given suicide is morally impermissible, we do not normally have the right to prevent it forcibly, though this may be altered by juridical laws under some circumstances.
康德基于他所认为的人类内在价值,对自杀的允许性提出了一种非宗教的论证。在本文中,我首先表明,康德的道德框架意味着某些类型的自杀在道德上是允许的。就像根据康德的观点,某些杀人在道德上是允许的一样,根据等价准则实施的自杀也是允许的。意图、可预见性、自愿性、责任减轻和心理能力决定了杀人的道德特征。我认为,根据与道德相关的标准对自杀进行分类的自杀分类法与康德伦理学是一致的;它表明,即使我们持有生命的强大道义神圣性立场,我们也没有义务保护那些未来生活只带来深刻痛苦的人的生命,而且如果这样做尊重他们的尊严和自主权,帮助他们死亡可能是合理的。然而,杀人行为和自杀行为在道德上只是弱对称的,即使某种特定的自杀在道德上是不允许的,我们通常也没有权利强行阻止它,尽管在某些情况下,法律可能会对此进行修改。