Suppr超能文献

学习者对职业素养的看法:一项混合方法系统评价的方案

Learners' Perspectives of Professionalism: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

作者信息

Khan Nagina, van Mook Walther, Dave Subodh, Ha Sohyun, Sagisi Joshua, Davi Nicole, Aftab Chantel, Tiwari Sucheta, Hickman Marie, Gilliar Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV, United States.

Association of University Teachers of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 25;11(8):e37473. doi: 10.2196/37473.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Professionalism has come to be associated with competence in medical education, with the habitual and judicious use of communication, knowledge, technical skills, clinical reasoning, emotions, values, and reflection in daily practice for the benefit of the individual and community being served. Recent studies indicate students should have the opportunity to observe the application of knowledge and skills by their mentors to improve patient health and safety. A noticeable detail that needs implementation into the curriculum is the inclusion of student perspectives. This review will explore students' understanding and experience of professionalism in undergraduate medical education (UME).

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the protocol for a review that aims to develop an integrated synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies resulting in recommendations for medical school curricula to incorporate the learners' perspectives in teaching professionalism in UME.

METHODS

We will take an integrated approach to synthesis. Data will be extracted from the included studies, and quantitative data will be "qualitized." PubMed (Medline), Embase, PsycInfo, and ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) will be searched for studies published in English from 2010 to 2021. Studies will be screened and critically appraised for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool by 2 researchers, with disagreements resolved by a third researcher. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies will be considered. Our population of interest is undergraduate medical students; hence, studies on medical residents and graduate medical students will be excluded. We will consider studies that explore how concepts of professionalism are understood, experienced, and taught in undergraduate medicine and on how medical students understand and develop the identified constructs of professionalism.

RESULTS

This study is in the screening phase; therefore, no results are available at this time. However, we had initiated the searches, screening, and are currently in the critical appraisal stage. We will commence preparation to clean and convert the data for coding in July 2022, and analysis will be ongoing from the end of July 2022 until submission for publication in November 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This research will contribute to the student perspectives on professionalism in medical education literature. The findings will aid in the creation of a checklist to guide the development of a curriculum on professionalism in UME.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/37473.

摘要

背景

在医学教育中,专业素养已与能力相关联,即在日常实践中习惯性且明智地运用沟通、知识、技术技能、临床推理、情感、价值观和反思,以造福所服务的个人和社区。近期研究表明,学生应有机会观察其导师应用知识和技能以改善患者健康与安全的情况。课程中需要实施的一个显著细节是纳入学生的观点。本综述将探讨本科医学教育(UME)中学生对专业素养的理解和体验。

目的

本文介绍一项综述的方案,该综述旨在对定性和定量研究进行综合分析,从而为医学院校课程提出建议,以便在UME的专业素养教学中纳入学习者的观点。

方法

我们将采用综合方法进行分析。将从纳入的研究中提取数据,定量数据将进行“定性化”处理。将检索PubMed(Medline)、Embase、PsycInfo和ERIC(教育资源信息中心),查找2010年至今年发表的英文研究。由两名研究人员使用混合方法评估工具对研究进行筛选和严格的方法学质量评估,如有分歧则由第三名研究人员解决。将考虑定性、定量和混合方法研究。我们感兴趣的人群是本科医学生;因此,将排除关于住院医师和研究生医学生的研究。我们将考虑探讨本科医学中如何理解、体验和教授专业素养概念,以及医学生如何理解和培养已确定的专业素养构成要素的研究。

结果

本研究处于筛选阶段;因此,目前尚无结果。不过,我们已启动检索和筛选工作,目前正处于严格评估阶段。我们将于2022年7月开始准备清理和转换数据以便编码,分析工作将从2022年7月底持续到2022年11月提交发表。

结论

本研究将为医学教育文献中关于专业素养的学生观点做出贡献。研究结果将有助于创建一份清单,以指导UME专业素养课程的开发。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/37473

相似文献

1
Learners' Perspectives of Professionalism: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 25;11(8):e37473. doi: 10.2196/37473.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
7
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education: advances and innovations.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125 Suppl 2:S1-14. doi: 10.1002/lary.24875. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
Medical professionalism in the formal curriculum: 5th year medical students' experiences.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 30;14:259. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0259-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Collaboration and integrated services for perinatal mental health: an integrative review.
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013 Feb;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00639.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
3
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
4
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
5
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Qualitative evaluation of just-in-time simulation-based learning: the learners' perspective.
Simul Healthc. 2013 Feb;8(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827861e8.
9
Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities.
Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.
10
Incorporating professionalism into medical education: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Keio J Med. 2009 Sep;58(3):133-43. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.133.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验