Huang Xinchuan, Schwenke David W, Freedman Richard S, Lee Timothy J
MS 245-6, Astrophysics Branch, Space Science and Astrobiology Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States.
SETI Institute, 339 Bernardo Avenue, Suite 200, Mountain View, California 94043, United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2022 Sep 8;126(35):5940-5964. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c01291. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
A highly accurate CO dipole moment surface (DMS), Ames-2021, is reported along with CO infrared (IR) intensity comparisons approaching a 1-4‰ level of agreement and uncertainty. The Ames-2021 DMS was accurately fitted from CCSD(T) finite-field dipoles computed with the aug-cc-pVXZ (X = T, Q, 5) basis for C atom and the d-aug-cc-pVXZ (X = T, Q, 5) basis for O atoms, and extrapolated to the one particle basis set limit. Fitting σ is 3.8 × 10 au for 4443 geometries below 15 000 cm. The corresponding IR intensity, , are computed using the Ames-2 potential energy surface (PES), which is the best PES available for CO. Compared to high accuracy IR studies for 2001-00001 and 3001-00001 bands, matches NIST experiment-based intensities [ or ] to -1.0 ± 1.3‰, or matches DLR experiment-based intensities [] to 1.9 ± 3.7‰. This indicates the systematic deviations and uncertainties have been significantly reduced in . The (or ) have larger deviations (vs ) and uncertainties (vs , ) which are attributed to the less accurate Ames-1 PES adopted in UCL-296 line list calculation. The intensity of CO and CO is utilized to derive new absolute C/C ratios for Vienna PeeDee Belemnite (VPDB) with uncertainty reduced by / or /. Further evaluation of intensities are carried out on those CO bands discussed in the HITRAN2020 update paper. Consistent improvements and better accuracies are found in band-by-band analysis, except for those bands strongly affected by Coriolis couplings, or very weak bands measured with relatively larger experimental uncertainties. The Ames-2021 296 K IR line lists are generated for 13 CO isotopologues, with 18 000 cm and > 1 × 10 cm/molecule cutoff and then combined with CDSD line positions (except CO). The Ames-2021 DMS and 296 K IR line lists represent a major improvement over previous CO theoretical IR intensity studies, including Ames-2016, UCL-296, and recent UCL DMS 2021 update. A real 1 permille level of agreement and uncertainty will definitely require more accurate PES more accurate DMS.
报道了一种高精度的一氧化碳偶极矩面(DMS)——Ames - 2021,同时给出了一氧化碳红外(IR)强度比较结果,其一致性和不确定性接近1 - 4‰水平。Ames - 2021 DMS是根据使用针对C原子的aug - cc - pVXZ(X = T、Q、5)基组和针对O原子的d - aug - cc - pVXZ(X = T、Q、5)基组计算的CCSD(T)有限场偶极矩精确拟合得到的,并外推到单粒子基组极限。对于15000 cm以下的4443个几何结构,拟合标准差σ为3.8×10 au。相应的红外强度 使用Ames - 2势能面(PES)计算,这是可用于一氧化碳的最佳PES。与2001 - 00001和3001 - 00001波段的高精度红外研究相比, 与基于NIST实验的强度[或 ]匹配度达到 - 1.0±1.3‰,或者与基于DLR实验的强度[ ]匹配度达到1.9±3.7‰。这表明 在系统偏差和不确定性方面已显著降低。 (或 )与 相比有更大的偏差(相对于 )和不确定性(相对于 , ),这归因于UCL - 296谱线列表计算中采用的Ames - 1 PES不够精确。利用一氧化碳和一氧化碳的 强度推导出维也纳皮迪迪贝莱姆石(VPDB)新的绝对C/C比,不确定性降低了 /或 /。对HITRAN2020更新论文中讨论的那些一氧化碳波段进行了 强度的进一步评估。在逐波段分析中发现了持续的改进和更高的精度,除了那些受科里奥利耦合强烈影响的波段,或者测量时实验不确定性相对较大的非常弱的波段。为13种一氧化碳同位素异构体生成了Ames - 2021 296 K红外谱线列表,截止值为18000 cm且 >1×10 cm/分子,然后与CDSD谱线位置(一氧化碳除外)相结合。Ames - 2021 DMS和296 K红外谱线列表代表了相对于先前一氧化碳理论红外强度研究(包括Ames - 2016、UCL - 296和最近的UCL DMS 2021更新)的重大改进。真正达到1‰水平的一致性和不确定性肯定需要 更精确的PES 更精确的DMS。