• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术:全面、系统的文献综述。

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review.

机构信息

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Oct;277:57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
PMID:36007356
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and subjective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re-operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, however grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术(LUSLS)治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)越来越受欢迎。本系统评价旨在调查接受该手术的女性的围手术期结果和并发症、主观和客观成功率以及复发率。

研究设计

2021 年 12 月进行了系统文献检索。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)评估所选研究的方法学质量。Clavien-Dindo(CD)量表和 Satava 量表用于对围手术期并发症进行分类。连续变量以平均值和标准差表示,而分类变量以整组的百分比表示。统计学意义设为 p<0.05。

结果

共选择并分析了 26 篇文章,共有 1401 名患者。LUSLS 后的解剖学和主观成功率分别为 79%和 100%和 76.2%至 100%。最大队列中的再手术率从 2%到 4.5%不等。总体并发症发生率为 13.6%,但仅 1%的患者发生 CD 分级 III 并发症。仅在 2 例中描述了输尿管并发症。

结论

LUSLS 是治疗 POP 患者阴道顶点脱垂的一种安全有效的技术。需要进一步进行更大规模的前瞻性随机研究来证实这些数据。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术:全面、系统的文献综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Oct;277:57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
3
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
4
Laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic literature review.腹腔镜下侧方悬吊带术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:系统文献回顾。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.044. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹及经阴道联合子宫切除术治疗女性生殖道盆腔脏器脱垂的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2021-2031. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04861-4. Epub 2021 May 29.
6
Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse.针对后盆腔脏器脱垂女性的手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;3(3):CD012975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012975.
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
8
Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review.骶棘韧带固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的解剖学结局异质性:一项系统评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1424-33. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000264066.89094.21.
9
The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2023 Dec;130(13):1568-1578. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17565. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
10
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women.女性慢性盆腔痛的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD008212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008212.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic lateral suspension combined with uterosacral ligament folding and shortening versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜侧方悬吊联合子宫骶韧带折叠缩短术与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1626735. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1626735. eCollection 2025.
2
Is Transvaginal Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation a Safe and Effective Surgical Approach for Treating Recurrent Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?经阴道微创骶棘韧带固定术是治疗复发性盆腔器官顶端脱垂的安全有效手术方法吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 24;14(15):5235. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155235.
3
Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review.
经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)治疗顶端盆腔脏器脱垂子宫骶韧带悬吊术的疗效:一项系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06195-x.
4
Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Vault Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy.子宫切除术中腹腔镜与阴道高位子宫骶韧带穹窿悬吊术的结局
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Mar;36(3):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06033-6. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
5
Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Urogynecological Surgery: A Systematic Review.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)在妇科泌尿手术中的应用:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5707. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195707.
6
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability.腹腔镜子宫骶韧带悬吊术:安全性与持久性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 7;10:1180060. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060. eCollection 2023.