Rojas Viñuela Javier, Piñero David P, Martínez Mercedes Burgos
Natural Optics Balaguer, 25600 Balaguer, Lleida, Spain.
Department of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, 03016 Alicante, Spain; Department of Optics, Pharmacology, and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Spain.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Apr;46(2):101747. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101747. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
To compare the sagittal height of the anterior eye (OC-SAG) calculated using corneal parameters with the OC-SAG measured by profilometry.
Seventy right eyes of soft contact lens wearers measured with the ESP (Eaglet Eye, The Netherlands) after lens removal were retrospectively analyzed for this study. The OC-SAG of the eyes was calculated using mean k-values, eccentricity and the inner (corneal) radius obtained with the ESP for an 11-mm cord diameter. It was then extrapolated to chord diameters of 14, 14.5 and 15 mm. These values were compared with OC-SAG values obtained with the ESP for the same chord diameters. Additionally, the OC-SAG was calculated through the formula used by a lab that manufactures custom soft lenses (mark'ennovy, Madrid, Spain) and compared again with the values obtained using the ESP.
Differences between calculated OC-SAG obviating the shape factor were 121 ± 44, 155 ± 105, 172 ± 117 and 189 ± 129 µm for chord diameters of 11, 14, 14.5 and 15 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). When the shape factor was included in the calculation, differences were 28 ± 48, 62 ± 102, 79 ± 113 and 96 ± 123 µm (p < 0.001). When the inner best fit sphere was used to estimate OC-SAG, differences were 34 ± 11, 0 ± 72, 17 ± 86 and 34 ± 99, respectively, with no significant differences for the 14 and 14.5 mm-chord diameters (p = 0.99 and 0.11, respectively). Correlation coefficients between OC-SAG calculated and measured OC-SAG ranged from 0.53 to 0.90 depending on the chord diameter used. When the mark'ennovy formula was used to calculate the OC-SAG as the lens diameter proposed by the formula, the difference was -47 ± 147 µm (p < 0.01).
Differences between the OC-SAG calculated using corneal parameters and that measured with a profilometer are statistically and clinically significant, especially for large chord diameters. The impact of this on contact lens fitting should be addressed in future studies.
比较使用角膜参数计算得出的眼前部矢状高度(OC-SAG)与通过轮廓测量法测得的OC-SAG。
本研究回顾性分析了70只软性接触镜佩戴者摘除镜片后使用ESP(荷兰鹰眼神仪)测量的右眼。使用ESP获取的平均角膜曲率值、偏心率和11毫米弦径的内(角膜)半径来计算眼睛的OC-SAG。然后将其外推至弦径为14、14.5和15毫米的情况。将这些值与使用ESP针对相同弦径获得的OC-SAG值进行比较。此外,通过一家定制软性镜片制造商(西班牙马德里的mark'ennovy)使用的公式计算OC-SAG,并再次与使用ESP获得的值进行比较。
对于弦径为11、14、14.5和15毫米的情况,不考虑形状因子时计算得出的OC-SAG之间差异分别为121±44、155±105、172±117和189±129微米(p<0.001)。当计算中包含形状因子时,差异分别为28±48、62±102、79±113和96±123微米(p<0.001)。当使用内最佳拟合球来估计OC-SAG时,差异分别为34±11、0±72、17±86和34±99,对于弦径为14和14.5毫米时无显著差异(分别为p = 0.99和0.11)。根据所使用的弦径不同,计算得出的OC-SAG与测量得到的OC-SAG之间的相关系数范围为0.53至0.90。当使用mark'ennovy公式按照公式所建议的镜片直径来计算OC-SAG时,差异为-47±147微米(p<0.01)。
使用角膜参数计算得出的OC-SAG与使用轮廓仪测量得出的OC-SAG之间的差异在统计学和临床上均具有显著意义,尤其是对于较大弦径的情况。这对接触镜验配的影响应在未来研究中予以探讨。