Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Univ Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Lyon, France.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2022 Nov;49(6):615-623. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
To assess the reliability of a French version of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGSfv).
Prospective, randomized, clinical study.
The operated (OP) group included 13 horses undergoing elective surgery. The positive (PC) and negative control (NC) groups included seven colicking horses and eight exercising sport horses, respectively.
Photographs were extracted from videos of the horses' heads. Videos were taken before and immediately after surgery in OP, on arrival of the horse in PC, and at rest in their stalls in NC. Pictures were evaluated by three anaesthetists [Diplomates (DIPs)] and four riders (RIDs) using Horse Grimace Scale translated into French (HGSfv) at two points, 2 weeks apart (E1 and E2). Each evaluator gave each image a score (1-3) for six identified facial action units. The scores given by DIPs and RIDs were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Intra- and inter-evaluator reliability were assessed using Spearman correlation tests (r) and intra-class coefficients (ICCs), respectively.
RIDs and DIPs gave significantly higher scores in the PC group than in the NC group [RIDsE1PC 5.0 (4.2-9.8) versus RIDsE1NC 2.2 (0.0-6.5), p = 0.02; RIDsE2PC 5.2 (3.2-9.5) versus RIDsE2NC 2.0 (0.2-5.8), p < 0.01; DIPsE1PC 4.0 (1.3-6.3) versus DIPsE1NC 2.2 (1.0-4.7), p = 0.04; DIPsE2PC 2.7 (1.0-6.0) versus DIPsE2NC 1.0 (0.0-2.3), p = 0.03]. Scores given by RID or DIPs 2 weeks apart were highly correlated [r (RIDsE1, RIDsE2) r = 0.86, p < 0.0001] and [r (DIPsE1, DIPsE2) r = 0.81 p < 0.0001]. The ICC between RIDs and DIPs in E1 and E2 was 0.94 (0.92-0.95) and 0.91 (0.89-0.93), respectively. The specificity and sensitivity of the HGSfv was 94% and 43%, respectively.
Using the HGSfv, knowledge of horses rather than specialization in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia appears to differentiate horses with visceral pain from those assumed to be pain free.
评估法语版马匹面部表情评估量表(HGSfv)的可靠性。
前瞻性、随机、临床研究。
手术组(OP)包括 13 匹接受择期手术的马。阳性对照组(PC)和阴性对照组(NC)分别包括 7 匹疝痛马和 8 匹运动马。
从马头的视频中提取照片。OP 组在手术前和手术后立即、PC 组在马到达时以及 NC 组在马厩中休息时拍摄视频。三位麻醉师(DIPs)和四位骑手(RIDs)使用翻译成法语的马匹面部表情评估量表(HGSfv)在两周后(E1 和 E2)两次评估图片。每位评估者对 6 个识别出的面部动作单元的每张图像进行评分(1-3 分)。使用 Wilcoxon 检验比较 DIPs 和 RIDs 的评分。使用 Spearman 相关检验(r)和组内系数(ICC)分别评估内部和内部评估者的可靠性。
RIDs 和 DIPs 在 PC 组的评分明显高于 NC 组[RIDsE1PC 5.0(4.2-9.8)vs. RIDsE1NC 2.2(0.0-6.5),p=0.02;RIDsE2PC 5.2(3.2-9.5)vs. RIDsE2NC 2.0(0.2-5.8),p<0.01;DIPsE1PC 4.0(1.3-6.3)vs. DIPsE1NC 2.2(1.0-4.7),p=0.04;DIPsE2PC 2.7(1.0-6.0)vs. DIPsE2NC 1.0(0.0-2.3),p=0.03]。两周后 RID 或 DIPs 的评分高度相关[r(RIDsE1,RIDsE2)r=0.86,p<0.0001]和[r(DIPsE1,DIPsE2)r=0.81,p<0.0001]。E1 和 E2 时 RID 和 DIPs 之间的 ICC 分别为 0.94(0.92-0.95)和 0.91(0.89-0.93)。HGSfv 的特异性和敏感性分别为 94%和 43%。
使用 HGSfv,马的知识而不是兽医麻醉和镇痛方面的专业知识似乎可以区分有内脏疼痛的马和假定无疼痛的马。