• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用认知与运动障碍之间的相互作用进行主要神经认知障碍的风险筛查:EPIDOS观察性队列研究结果

Using Interaction between Cognitive and Motor Impairment for Risk Screening of Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results of the EPIDOS Observational Cohort Study.

作者信息

Beauchet Olivier, Matskiv Jacqueline, Rolland Yves, Schott Anne-Marie, Allali Gilles

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.

Research Centre of the Geriatric University Institute of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 31;12(8):1021. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081021.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci12081021
PMID:36009084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cognitive and motor impairments are risk factors of major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD). Inability to name the date and use of a walking aid and/or history of falls are two items which are surrogate measures of cognitive and motor impairments. This study aims to examine the association of inability to name the date (i.e., cognitive impairment), use of a walking aid and/or history of falls (i.e., motor impairment) and their combination with incident MNCD in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

A total of 709 participants (mean age 79.8 ± 3.7; 100% female) of the EPIDémiologie de l'OStéoporose (EPIDOS) study recruited in Toulouse (France) were selected for this study. EPIDOS is an observational population-based cohort study with a 7-year follow-up period for Toulouse participants. Inability to name the date and use of a walking aid and/or history of falls were collected at baseline. Incident MNCD and their type (i.e., Alzheimer's disease (AD) and non-AD) were diagnosed at the end of the 7-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall incidence of MNCD was 29.1%. Cox regressions revealed that inability to name the date and its combination with use of a walking aid and/or history of falls was associated with a significant increased incidence of MNCD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10 with = 0.003 and HR = 1.81 with = 0.011, respectively) and AD (HR =1.13 with = 0.003 and HR = 2.80 with = 0.016, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased incident MNCD was reported when inability to name the date and use of a walking aid and/or history of falls were combined, suggesting that this combination of items may be used for risk screening of MNCD in the older population, especially for incident AD.

摘要

背景与目的

认知和运动障碍是主要神经认知障碍(MNCD)的危险因素。无法说出日期、使用助行器和/或跌倒史是认知和运动障碍的两项替代指标。本研究旨在探讨社区居住的老年人中无法说出日期(即认知障碍)、使用助行器和/或跌倒史(即运动障碍)及其组合与MNCD发病之间的关联。

方法

本研究选取了在法国图卢兹招募的骨质疏松症流行病学(EPIDOS)研究中的709名参与者(平均年龄79.8±3.7岁;100%为女性)。EPIDOS是一项基于人群的观察性队列研究,对图卢兹的参与者进行了7年的随访。在基线时收集无法说出日期、使用助行器和/或跌倒史的信息。在7年随访结束时诊断出MNCD及其类型(即阿尔茨海默病(AD)和非AD)。

结果

MNCD的总体发病率为29.1%。Cox回归显示,无法说出日期及其与使用助行器和/或跌倒史的组合与MNCD发病率显著增加相关(风险比(HR)分别为1.10,P = 0.003;HR为1.81,P = 0.011),与AD发病率也显著增加相关(HR分别为1.13,P = 0.003;HR为2.80,P = 0.016)。

结论

当无法说出日期与使用助行器和/或跌倒史同时存在时,MNCD的发病风险增加,这表明这些指标的组合可用于老年人群中MNCD的风险筛查,尤其是对于AD的发病风险筛查。

相似文献

1
Using Interaction between Cognitive and Motor Impairment for Risk Screening of Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results of the EPIDOS Observational Cohort Study.利用认知与运动障碍之间的相互作用进行主要神经认知障碍的风险筛查:EPIDOS观察性队列研究结果
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 31;12(8):1021. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081021.
2
Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations and Risk Screening of Incident Major Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Females: Results of an Observational Population-Based Cohort Study.老年女性突发重大神经认知障碍的急诊室评估、建议及风险筛查:一项基于人群的观察性队列研究结果
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jul 22;14:912477. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.912477. eCollection 2022.
3
Interaction between cognitive and motor disorders for risk screening of incident falls: results of an elderly population-based observational cohort study.认知和运动障碍相互作用与老年人跌倒风险筛查:一项基于人群的观察性队列研究结果。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 May;35(5):1027-1032. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02392-0. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome and Risk for Falls, Their Recurrence, and Postfall Fractures: Results From a Prospective Observational Population-Based Cohort Study.运动认知风险综合征与跌倒风险及其复发和跌倒后骨折:一项前瞻性观察性基于人群队列研究的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Oct;20(10):1268-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident dementia: results from a population-based prospective and observational cohort study.运动认知风险综合征与痴呆症发病风险:一项基于人群的前瞻性观察队列研究结果。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Mar;27(3):468-474. doi: 10.1111/ene.14093. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
6
Frailty, Cognitive Impairment, and Incident Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results of the NuAge Cohort Study.衰弱、认知障碍与新发重大神经认知障碍:NuAge 队列研究结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;94(3):1079-1092. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230006.
7
ER risk levels and their association with incident falls, their recurrence and post-fall fractures in older women: Results of the EPIDOS study.老年女性急诊风险水平及其与新发跌倒、跌倒复发和跌倒后骨折的关系:EPIDOS 研究结果。
Maturitas. 2023 Dec;178:107838. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107838. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and mortality: results from the EPIDOS cohort.运动认知风险综合征与死亡率:EPIDOS 队列研究结果。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 May;26(5):794-e56. doi: 10.1111/ene.13891. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
9
Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, Social Engagement, and Falls Among Older Primary Care Patients.轻度认知障碍、社会参与度与老年初级保健患者跌倒的关系。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr;104(4):541-546. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
10
Orthostatic hypotension and neurocognitive disorders in older women: Results from the EPIDOS cohort study.老年女性直立性低血压与神经认知障碍:EPIDOS 队列研究结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0281634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281634. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanisms of motoric cognitive risk-Hypotheses based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies of older adults.运动认知风险的机制——基于对老年人纵向队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析的假设。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Dec;18(12):2413-2427. doi: 10.1002/alz.12547. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
General population perspectives of dementia risk reduction and the implications for intervention: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.一般人群对痴呆症风险降低的看法及其对干预措施的影响:系统评价和定性证据的主题综合分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257540. eCollection 2021.
3
Risk for short-term undesirable outcomes in older emergency department users: Results of the ER2 observational cohort study.老年急诊科患者短期不良结局的风险:ER2 观察性队列研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0249882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249882. eCollection 2021.
4
Adverse Health Effects of Frailty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.衰弱对健康的不良影响:从中年和老年人的系统评价和荟萃分析及对循证实践的启示
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Aug;18(4):282-289. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12508. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident dementia in older adults from the Québec NuAge cohort.运动认知风险综合征与魁北克 NuAge 队列老年人的痴呆发病风险。
Age Ageing. 2021 May 5;50(3):969-973. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa235.
6
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
Motor function and incident dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.运动功能与新发痴呆:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):729-738. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx084.
8
Walking Pace and the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Dementia in Elderly Populations: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.步行速度与老年人群认知能力下降及痴呆症风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Feb;72(2):266-270. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw121. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
Poor Gait Performance and Prediction of Dementia: Results From a Meta-Analysis.步态表现不佳与痴呆症预测:一项荟萃分析的结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.092. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
From Subjective Cognitive Complaints to Dementia: Who is at Risk?: A Systematic Review.从主观认知主诉到痴呆症:谁处于风险之中?一项系统综述。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Mar;31(2):105-14. doi: 10.1177/1533317515592331.