• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

田纳西州养牛户关于负责任使用抗生素的情感主题。

Emotive Themes from Tennessee Cattle Producers Regarding Responsible Antibiotic Use.

作者信息

Okafor Chika C, Ekakoro John E, Caldwell Marc, Strand Elizabeth B

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;12(16):2088. doi: 10.3390/ani12162088.

DOI:10.3390/ani12162088
PMID:36009678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9405180/
Abstract

To improve judicious antimicrobial use (AMU) in food animals in the United States, all feed additives that were medically important antimicrobials were moved from over the counter to Veterinary Feed Directive in 2017. This action required a change in behavior of producers' AMU practices. Because emotions are important aspects of behavior, several behavioral interventions have targeted people's emotions as means of effecting change. Hence, understanding and incorporating the emotional experiences of producers towards current AMU practices can be a starting point to making future behavioral changes that could reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance challenge. Between June 2017 and March 2018, seven focus group meetings of Tennessee (TN) beef and dairy cattle producers were conducted to evaluate producers' emotional views regarding responsible AMU in TN cattle. Sixty-two TN cattle producers participated and emotively expressed the following: (1) deep connections to animals in ways that improve animal and public health; (2) pride in their quality of products; (3) distress that consumers misconceive their AMU practices as indiscriminate; and (4) recommended that producers be more transparent about their AMU practices and the public improve their awareness for detecting marketers' deceptive product labels that take advantage of public ignorance. Knowledge of these producers' emotions would help educators target more successful behavioral change campaigns, improving stewardship in AMU practices among producers.

摘要

为改善美国食用动物的合理抗菌药物使用(AMU)情况,2017年所有曾作为重要医用抗菌药物的饲料添加剂从非处方用药转为需遵循《兽医饲料指令》。这一举措要求生产者的抗菌药物使用行为做出改变。由于情感是行为的重要方面,一些行为干预措施将人们的情感作为实现改变的手段。因此,了解并纳入生产者对当前抗菌药物使用做法的情感体验,可能是未来做出行为改变的起点,这些改变可以减少抗菌药物耐药性挑战的出现。在2017年6月至2018年3月期间,针对田纳西州(TN)肉牛和奶牛养殖户召开了七次焦点小组会议,以评估养殖户对田纳西州牛负责任抗菌药物使用的情感看法。62位田纳西州的养殖户参与其中,并激动地表达了以下观点:(1)通过改善动物和公共卫生的方式与动物建立深厚联系;(2)对其产品质量感到自豪;(3)因消费者将他们的抗菌药物使用行为误解为不加区分而感到苦恼;(4)建议养殖户在抗菌药物使用做法上更加透明,公众提高识别利用公众无知的营销商欺骗性产品标签的意识。了解这些养殖户的情感,将有助于教育工作者开展更成功的行为改变活动,改善养殖户抗菌药物使用做法中的管理水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff2/9405180/e300ac6d2706/animals-12-02088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff2/9405180/e300ac6d2706/animals-12-02088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff2/9405180/e300ac6d2706/animals-12-02088-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotive Themes from Tennessee Cattle Producers Regarding Responsible Antibiotic Use.田纳西州养牛户关于负责任使用抗生素的情感主题。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;12(16):2088. doi: 10.3390/ani12162088.
2
Drivers, alternatives, knowledge, and perceptions towards antimicrobial use among Tennessee beef cattle producers: a qualitative study.田纳西州肉牛养殖户对抗菌药物使用的驱动因素、替代方法、认知及看法:一项定性研究
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Jan 7;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1731-6.
3
A survey of antimicrobial use practices of Tennessee beef producers.田纳西州肉牛养殖者的抗菌药物使用情况调查。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Jul 2;15(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1978-6.
4
Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers.田纳西州奶牛养殖户抗菌药物使用行为的驱动因素
Vet Med Int. 2018 Dec 27;2018:1836836. doi: 10.1155/2018/1836836. eCollection 2018.
5
Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.田纳西州肉牛生产者对兽医饲料指令的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217773. eCollection 2019.
6
Producer attitudes regarding antimicrobial use and resistance in Canadian cow-calf herds.加拿大奶牛-小牛群中生产者对抗生素使用和耐药性的态度。
Can Vet J. 2023 Nov;64(11):1035-1043.
7
Understanding antimicrobial stewardship: Disease severity treatment thresholds and antimicrobial alternatives among organic and conventional calf producers.了解抗菌药物管理:有机和常规小牛生产者的疾病严重程度治疗阈值和抗菌药物替代物。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Aug 1;130:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Livestock producers' knowledge, attitude, and behavior (KAB) regarding antimicrobial use in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚牲畜养殖户对抗菌素使用的知识、态度和行为(KAB)
Front Vet Sci. 2023 May 19;10:1167847. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1167847. eCollection 2023.
9
Antimicrobial use practices of veterinary clinicians at a veterinary teaching hospital in the United States.美国一家兽医教学医院兽医临床医生的抗菌药物使用情况
Vet Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 26;7:100038. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2018.09.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Knowledge, attitude and practices of Swiss dairy farmers towards intramammary antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance: A latent class analysis.瑞士奶农对乳房内使用抗菌药物和抗菌药物耐药性的知识、态度和做法:潜在类别分析。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jun;179:105023. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105023. Epub 2020 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic Resistance in spp. Isolated from Broiler Chicken Meat and Human Patients in Estonia.从爱沙尼亚肉鸡和人类患者中分离出的[具体物种]中的抗生素耐药性
Microorganisms. 2022 May 22;10(5):1067. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10051067.
2
Antimicrobial Resistance and Clonal Lineages of from Cattle, Their Handlers, and Their Surroundings: A Cross-Sectional Study from the One Health Perspective.牛及其饲养者和周围环境中细菌的抗微生物药物耐药性与克隆谱系:一项基于同一健康视角的横断面研究
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 30;10(5):941. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050941.
3
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance in Strains Isolated from Food, Animal and Human Samples between 2017 and 2021 in Southern Italy.
2017年至2021年意大利南部从食品、动物和人类样本中分离出的菌株的抗菌药物耐药性评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):812. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040812.
4
Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: A Narrative Review of Existing Evidence.德国、奥地利和瑞士环境中抗菌药物耐药性的发生情况:现有证据的叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Mar 29;10(4):728. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040728.
5
Antimicrobial Resistance in Isolates from Healthy Food Animals in South Korea, 2010-2020.2010 - 2020年韩国健康食用动物分离株中的抗菌药物耐药性
Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 28;10(3):524. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030524.
6
Prevalence and Characteristics of Associated with Meat and Meat Products in African Countries: A Review.非洲国家肉类及肉类制品相关疾病的患病率和特征:综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;10(9):1108. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091108.
7
Understanding farmers' and veterinarians' behavior in relation to antimicrobial use and resistance in dairy cattle: A systematic review.理解奶牛养殖业中农民和兽医在使用和抗微生物药物方面的行为:系统综述。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Apr;104(4):4584-4603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19614. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Behaviour change interventions: getting in touch with individual differences, values and emotions.行为改变干预措施:关注个体差异、价值观和情感。
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2020 Dec;11(6):589-598. doi: 10.1017/S2040174420000604. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
Addressing Individual Values to Impact Prudent Antimicrobial Prescribing in Animal Agriculture.关注个体价值观以影响畜牧业中谨慎使用抗菌药物的行为。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 May 28;7:297. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00297. eCollection 2020.
10
Antimicrobial Resistance in Humans and Animals: Rapid Review of Psychological and Behavioral Determinants.人类和动物中的抗菌素耐药性:心理和行为决定因素快速综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 May 27;9(6):285. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060285.