Nasri Maedeh, Tsou Yung-Ting, Koutamanis Alexander, Baratchi Mitra, Giest Sarah, Reidsma Dennis, Rieffe Carolien
Unit of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden-Delft-Erasmus Centre for BOLD Cities, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;9(8):1177. doi: 10.3390/children9081177.
(1) Many children in schoolyards are excluded from social interactions with peers on a daily basis. For these excluded children, schoolyard environments often contain features that hinder, rather than facilitate, their participation. These features may include lack of appropriate play equipment, overcrowded areas, or insufficient supervision. These can generate negative situations, especially for children with special needs-such as attention deficit or autism-which includes 10% of children worldwide. All children need to be able to participate in their social environment in order to engage in social learning and development. For children living with a condition that limits access to social learning, barriers to schoolyard participation can further inhibit this. Given that much physical development also occurs as a result of schoolyard play, excluded children may also be at risk for reduced physical development. (2) However, empirically examining schoolyard environments in order to understand existing obstacles to participation requires huge amounts of detailed, precise information about play behaviour, movement, and social interactions of children in a given environment from different layers around the child (physical, social, and cultural). Recruiting this information has typically been exceedingly difficult and too expensive. In this preliminary study, we present a novel sensor data-driven approach for gathering information on social interactions and apply it, in light of schoolyard affordances and individual effectivities, to examine to what extent the schoolyard environment affects children's movements and social behaviours. We collected and analysed sensor data from 150 children (aged 5-15 years) at two primary special education schools in the Netherlands using a global positioning system tracker, proximity tags, and Multi-Motion Receivers to measure locations, face-to-face interactions, and activities. Results show strong potential for this data-driven approach to examine the triad of physical, social, and cultural affordances in schoolyards. (3) First, we found strong potential in using our sensor data-driven approach for collecting data from individuals and their interactions with the schoolyard environment. Second, using this approach, we identified and discussed three schoolyard affordances (physical, social, and cultural) in our sample data. Third, we discussed factors that significantly impact children's movement and social behaviours in schoolyards: schoolyard capacity, social use of space, and individual differences. Better knowledge on the impact of these factors could help identify limitations in existing schoolyard designs and inform school officials, policymakers, supervisory authorities, and designers about current problems and practical solutions. This data-driven approach could play a crucial role in collecting information that will help identify factors involved in children's effective movements and social behaviour.
(1)校园里的许多孩子每天都被排除在与同伴的社交互动之外。对于这些被排斥的孩子来说,校园环境往往包含一些阻碍而非促进他们参与的特征。这些特征可能包括缺乏合适的游乐设备、区域拥挤或监管不足。这些情况会产生负面状况,尤其是对有特殊需求的孩子,比如患有注意力缺陷或自闭症的孩子,这类孩子占全球儿童总数的10%。所有孩子都需要能够参与他们的社交环境,以便进行社会学习和发展。对于那些因自身状况而限制了社会学习机会的孩子来说,校园参与的障碍会进一步抑制这一点。鉴于很多身体发育也是在校园玩耍过程中发生的,被排斥的孩子身体发育减缓的风险可能也更高。(2)然而,为了了解参与的现有障碍而对校园环境进行实证研究,需要大量关于特定环境中孩子的玩耍行为、活动和社交互动的详细、精确信息,这些信息要从孩子周围的不同层面(物理、社会和文化)获取。收集这些信息通常极其困难且成本过高。在这项初步研究中,我们提出了一种新颖的传感器数据驱动方法来收集社交互动信息,并根据校园可供性和个体效能将其应用于研究校园环境在多大程度上影响孩子的活动和社会行为。我们在荷兰的两所小学特殊教育学校,使用全球定位系统追踪器、近场标签和多运动接收器收集并分析了150名儿童(5至15岁)的传感器数据,以测量位置、面对面互动和活动。结果表明,这种数据驱动方法在研究校园中物理、社会和文化可供性三元组方面具有很大潜力。(3)首先,我们发现使用传感器数据驱动方法从个体及其与校园环境的互动中收集数据具有很大潜力。其次,使用这种方法,我们在样本数据中识别并讨论了三种校园可供性(物理、社会和文化)。第三,我们讨论了显著影响孩子在校园中的活动和社会行为的因素:校园容量、空间的社会利用和个体差异。更好地了解这些因素的影响有助于识别现有校园设计中的局限性,并向学校管理人员、政策制定者、监管机构和设计师通报当前问题及实际解决方案。这种数据驱动方法在收集有助于识别影响孩子有效活动和社会行为的因素的信息方面可能发挥关键作用。