Amorim Nídia De, Parreiral José, Santos Sofia
POLO UIDEFMH, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1499-002 Lisboa, Portugal.
Centro de Reabilitação de Paralisia Cerebral de Coimbra, 3030-188 Coimbra, Portugal.
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 9;9(8):1195. doi: 10.3390/children9081195.
Psychomotor assessment is an expanding research field. A deep knowledge of the typical development will allow for better child-centered planning. Due to the scarcity of psychomotor assessment instruments validated in Portugal, our research aims to perform a preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Battery for Neuropsychomotor functions evaluation (NPmot.pt). The NPmot.pt was translated and adapted to the Portuguese language/culture and applied to 200 children, 4−12 years old (6 y 10 m ± 0 y 4 m), with (n = 150) and without developmental disorders, attending regular school. For content validity, nine experts classified all items according to their relevance, clarity, simplicity and ambiguity. All indexes (IVC > 0.78) pointed out the representativeness of indicators, corroborated by experts proportion agreement (>0.42), and Cohen’s kappa scores (0.02 > k < 0.95). Reliability was confirmed through internal consistency, with Cronbach alphas/split-half (α > 0.45) and temporal reliability (test-retest technique, 0.45 > r < 0.99). Construct validity was analyzed through domains and domains-total correlations, tending to moderate to strong (0.31 > r < 0.92); exploratory factor analysis pointed out an eight-factor solution, explaining 88.5% of the total variance. For discriminant validity, we conducted a comparative study between children with and without developmental disorders that revealed significant differences (p < 0.05). The NPmot.pt seems to confirm validity and reliability for Portugal; however, more studies are needed.
心理运动评估是一个不断发展的研究领域。深入了解典型发育情况将有助于以儿童为中心进行更好的规划。由于在葡萄牙经过验证的心理运动评估工具稀缺,我们的研究旨在对葡萄牙语版神经心理运动功能评估量表(NPmot.pt)的心理测量特性进行初步分析。NPmot.pt已被翻译并根据葡萄牙语言/文化进行了调整,并应用于200名4至12岁(6岁10个月±0岁4个月)的儿童,其中150名患有发育障碍,50名没有发育障碍,他们均就读于正规学校。对于内容效度,九位专家根据项目的相关性、清晰度、简单性和模糊性对所有项目进行了分类。所有指标(IVC>0.78)都指出了指标的代表性,专家比例一致性(>0.42)和科恩kappa分数(0.02>k<0.95)也证实了这一点。通过内部一致性(Cronbach阿尔法系数/分半系数,α>0.45)和时间可靠性(重测技术,0.45>r<0.99)确认了信度。通过领域与领域-总分相关性分析结构效度,相关性趋于中等至强(范围为0.31>r<0.92);探索性因素分析指出了一个八因素解决方案,解释了总方差的88.5%。对于区分效度,我们对患有和未患有发育障碍的儿童进行了比较研究,结果显示存在显著差异(p<0.05)。NPmot.pt似乎证实了其在葡萄牙的效度和信度;然而,还需要更多的研究。