Iglesias-Peón Marcos, Mesa-Jiménez Juan, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César, Rojas-García Jorge, Rodrigues-de-Souza Daiana Priscila, Alburquerque-Sendín Francisco
Osteopatía y Fisioterapia Guadalajara, 19005 Guadalajara, Spain.
Doctoral Program in Biomedicine, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 1;12(8):1861. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081861.
In recent years, the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Pain Disorders (DC/TMD) has been questioned, mainly because of the dependence on the muscular pressure needed to be applied during the clinical examination. Therefore, it is necessary to establish improvements in diagnostic strategies for DC/TMD of axis I. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Isometric Contraction Test of the masticatory muscles (ICTest) to diagnose DC/TMD of axis I. Forty (n = 40) patients with muscular TMD (myalgia in any of its subtypes), as well as forty age and sex matched controls, participated. They were diagnosed according to DC/TMD of axis I and performed the ICTest in a single session. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-) of the ICTest compared with the DC/TMD of axis I were calculated. The ICTest showed a specificity of 95% for the diagnosis of myalgia, and between 94.9% and 96.8% for all subtypes in relation to the DC/TMD of axis I. For sensitivity, lower values were obtained, that is, 90.0% for myalgia, and losing sensitivity depending on the type of myalgia. The LR+ was over 10 for all diagnoses, with the exception of myofascial pain with referral, which was lower. When addressing the LR-, the myofascial diagnosis was the only one below 0.2. According to the results, the ICTest could be considered a valid procedure to diagnose subjects with muscular TMD in a clinical setting.
近年来,颞下颌疼痛障碍诊断标准(DC/TMD)受到质疑,主要原因是临床检查过程中对所需肌肉压力的依赖。因此,有必要改进轴I型DC/TMD的诊断策略。本研究的目的是确定咀嚼肌等长收缩试验(ICTest)对诊断轴I型DC/TMD的有效性。40名患有肌肉型颞下颌关节紊乱病(任何亚型的肌痛)的患者以及40名年龄和性别匹配的对照组参与了研究。他们根据轴I型DC/TMD进行诊断,并在一次检查中进行ICTest。计算了ICTest与轴I型DC/TMD相比的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),以及阳性似然比(LR+)和阴性似然比(LR-)。ICTest对肌痛诊断的特异性为95%,相对于轴I型DC/TMD的所有亚型,特异性在94.9%至96.8%之间。对于敏感性,得到的值较低,即肌痛为90.0%,并且根据肌痛类型敏感性会降低。除了牵涉性肌筋膜疼痛的LR+较低外,所有诊断的LR+均超过10。在处理LR-时,肌筋膜诊断是唯一低于0.2的诊断。根据结果,ICTest可被认为是在临床环境中诊断肌肉型颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的有效方法。