• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术文本中的关键术语词汇表及其学科差异:从量子语义构建到基于相对熵的比较

Lexicons of Key Terms in Scholarly Texts and Their Disciplinary Differences: From Quantum Semantics Construction to Relative-Entropy-Based Comparisons.

作者信息

Koponen Ismo, Södervik Ilona

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

Centre for University Teaching and Learning (HYPE), University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;24(8):1058. doi: 10.3390/e24081058.

DOI:10.3390/e24081058
PMID:36010722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9407381/
Abstract

Complex networks are often used to analyze written text and reports by rendering texts in the form of a semantic network, forming a lexicon of words or key terms. Many existing methods to construct lexicons are based on counting word co-occurrences, having the advantage of simplicity and ease of applicability. Here, we use a quantum semantics approach to generalize such methods, allowing us to model the entanglement of terms and words. We show how quantum semantics can be applied to reveal disciplinary differences in the use of key terms by analyzing 12 scholarly texts that represent the different positions of various disciplinary schools (of conceptual change research) on the same topic (conceptual change). In addition, attention is paid to how closely the lexicons corresponding to different positions can be brought into agreement by suitable tuning of the entanglement factors. In comparing the lexicons, we invoke complex network-based analysis based on exponential matrix transformation and use information theoretic relative entropy (Jensen-Shannon divergence) as the operationalization of differences between lexicons. The results suggest that quantum semantics is a viable way to model the disciplinary differences of lexicons and how they can be tuned for a better agreement.

摘要

复杂网络通常用于通过将文本呈现为语义网络的形式来分析书面文本和报告,从而形成单词或关键术语的词汇表。许多现有的构建词汇表的方法基于计算单词共现,具有简单易用的优点。在这里,我们使用量子语义方法来推广此类方法,使我们能够对术语和单词的纠缠进行建模。我们展示了如何通过分析12篇学术文本(代表了不同学科流派(概念变化研究)在同一主题(概念变化)上的不同立场)来应用量子语义揭示关键术语使用中的学科差异。此外,还关注如何通过对纠缠因子进行适当调整,使对应于不同立场的词汇表达成更紧密的一致。在比较词汇表时,我们基于指数矩阵变换调用基于复杂网络的分析,并使用信息理论相对熵(詹森-香农散度)作为词汇表之间差异的操作化度量。结果表明,量子语义是一种可行的方法,可用于对词汇表的学科差异进行建模,以及如何对其进行调整以达成更好的一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/76f5d375d222/entropy-24-01058-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/90e4e0e92957/entropy-24-01058-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/cfe7bd7d1a61/entropy-24-01058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/e994c0a313d9/entropy-24-01058-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/ea3a9d59375d/entropy-24-01058-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/687ba1417ccb/entropy-24-01058-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/1bde2a258c11/entropy-24-01058-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/1cc3992327a3/entropy-24-01058-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/76f5d375d222/entropy-24-01058-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/90e4e0e92957/entropy-24-01058-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/cfe7bd7d1a61/entropy-24-01058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/e994c0a313d9/entropy-24-01058-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/ea3a9d59375d/entropy-24-01058-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/687ba1417ccb/entropy-24-01058-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/1bde2a258c11/entropy-24-01058-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/1cc3992327a3/entropy-24-01058-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/9407381/76f5d375d222/entropy-24-01058-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Lexicons of Key Terms in Scholarly Texts and Their Disciplinary Differences: From Quantum Semantics Construction to Relative-Entropy-Based Comparisons.学术文本中的关键术语词汇表及其学科差异:从量子语义构建到基于相对熵的比较
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;24(8):1058. doi: 10.3390/e24081058.
2
Extracting semantic lexicons from discharge summaries using machine learning and the C-Value method.使用机器学习和C值方法从出院小结中提取语义词典。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:409-16. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
3
Using General-purpose Sentiment Lexicons for Suicide Risk Assessment in Electronic Health Records: Corpus-Based Analysis.利用通用情感词典进行电子健康记录中的自杀风险评估:基于语料库的分析。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e22397. doi: 10.2196/22397.
4
Phonology, Semantics, and the Comprehension-Expression Gap in Emerging Lexicons.语音学、语义学与新兴词汇理解-表达鸿沟。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 20;62(12):4509-4522. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00177. Print 2019 Dec 18.
5
Automated Construction of Lexicons to Improve Depression Screening With Text Messages.利用短信自动构建词汇表以改善抑郁症筛查
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Jun;27(6):2751-2759. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3203345. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
6
MedLexSp - a medical lexicon for Spanish medical natural language processing.MedLexSp- 西班牙语医学自然语言处理的医学词典。
J Biomed Semantics. 2023 Feb 2;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13326-022-00281-5.
7
The Lexicon Builder Web service: Building Custom Lexicons from two hundred Biomedical Ontologies.词汇构建器网络服务:从两百个生物医学本体构建自定义词汇表。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:587-91.
8
Tracking word semantic change in biomedical literature.追踪生物医学文献中的词汇语义变化。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jan;109:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Are there mental lexicons? The role of semantics in lexical decision.是否存在心理词汇?语义在词汇判断中的作用。
Brain Res. 2010 Dec 13;1365:66-81. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.057. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
10
Evaluating the Applicability of Existing Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis Techniques on Family Medicine Resident Feedback Field Notes: Retrospective Cohort Study.评估现有基于词典的情感分析技术在家庭医学住院医师反馈现场记录中的适用性:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 27;9:e41953. doi: 10.2196/41953.

本文引用的文献

1
Revealing semantic and emotional structure of suicide notes with cognitive network science.用认知网络科学揭示自杀笔记的语义和情感结构。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98147-w.
2
Quantum semantics of text perception.文本感知的量子语义学。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83490-9.
3
Architecture and evolution of semantic networks in mathematics texts.数学文本中语义网络的架构与演变
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jul;476(2239):20190741. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0741. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Quantifying the diaspora of knowledge in the last century.量化上个世纪知识的传播。
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s41109-016-0017-9. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Science of science.科学学。
Science. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185.
6
Using text analysis to quantify the similarity and evolution of scientific disciplines.运用文本分析量化科学学科的相似性与演变。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jan 17;5(1):171545. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171545. eCollection 2018 Jan.
7
Modeling the average shortest-path length in growth of word-adjacency networks.词邻接网络增长中平均最短路径长度的建模
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Mar;91(3):032810. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032810. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
Probing the topological properties of complex networks modeling short written texts.探究用于模拟简短书面文本的复杂网络的拓扑特性。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0118394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118394. eCollection 2015.
9
Generalization of entropy based divergence measures for symbolic sequence analysis.基于熵的散度测度在符号序列分析中的推广。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e93532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093532. eCollection 2014.
10
Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences.科学层级的文献计量学证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e66938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066938. Print 2013.